STU 122 – Global Structural Behaviour (Theme 1 | Lecture 2)

Recap of Previous Concepts

  • Types of structural loads already covered in the course:

    • Dead load (DL)

    • Live load (LL)

    • Wind load (WL)

    • Seismic load (EL)

    • Others (snow, temperature, foundation settlement, etc.)

  • Structural design always combines loads so that the structure and its components avoid:

    • Loss of stability (global or local)

    • Collapse (ultimate limit state)

    • Excessive deflection or vibration (serviceability limit state)

    • Excessive cracking (serviceability & durability)

Essence of Structural Behaviour

  • Core purpose of every structural system: create a continuous path for forces to travel safely to the ground.

  • Famous architectural illustration: Centre Pompidou (Paris) shows clearly expressed structural and service pathways.

  • Practical takeaway: every beam, column, brace or wall serves as one link in that uninterrupted load path.

Loads on Building Structures

  • Two broad categories of actions acting on any building:

    • Internal / gravity related: floor loads, partitions, equipment, occupants, self-weight.

    • External / environmental: wind, earthquake, ground-induced movements, differential settlements.

  • Designer’s task: trace each individual load from its point of application through members → foundations → soil.

Global Stability

  • Stability deals with the building as a whole resisting sliding and overturning under combined vertical & horizontal loads.

  • Key horizontal actions considered: wind pressure, suction, uplift.

  • Failure modes examined:

    • Sliding (net horizontal reaction inadequate)

    • Overturning (moment equilibrium violated)

  • Fundamental equilibrium relationships (cantilever analogy):

    • Overturning moment: M=HaM = H a

    • Restoring moment (from vertical reactions): MR=VdM_R = V d

    • For overall equilibrium: Ha=VdH a = V d

  • Insight: increasing the lever arm of vertical reactions or reducing the lever arm of horizontal force lowers foundation reactions.

Comparative Study – Aspect Ratio Effects

  • Diagrams show three wall panels with same height hh but different base widths d<em>a,d</em>b,dcd<em>a, d</em>b, d_c.

  • Thicker base (larger dd) gives larger restoring lever arm → smaller required vertical reactions VV to resist same HH.

  • Rule of thumb: increasing base width is usually more efficient for stability than simply adding weight.

Rule of the Middle Third

  • For any prismatic block under combined vertical load WW and overturning moment MM, the resultant compressive stress distribution stays entirely compressive (no tension at base) if and only if the resultant vertical load falls within the middle third of the base.

  • Practical meaning:

    • Resultant eccentricity ee must satisfy ed6e \le \frac{d}{6} where dd = base width.

    • Outside this zone, part of the base sees tension; if uplift occurs → potential rocking/overturning.

Stiffness and Deflection

  • Microscopic view: atomic “spring” model – tensile forces stretch bonds, compressive forces shorten them.

  • Macroscopic law: deflection is inversely proportional to stiffness.

  • Two governing ingredients of stiffness:

    1. Material (modulus of elasticity EE)

    2. Geometry (member area AA for axial; moment of inertia II for bending; torsional constant JJ for torsion)

  • Typical modulus values:

    • Steel: E=200GPaE = 200\,\text{GPa}

    • Concrete: E2837GPaE \approx 28 \text{–} 37\,\text{GPa} (depends on strength & age)

    • Timber: E7.816GPaE \approx 7.8 \text{–} 16\,\text{GPa} (species-dependent)

Axial Stiffness

  • Defined by: kaxial=AELk_{\text{axial}} = \dfrac{A E}{L}

  • Axial deflection of a prismatic bar: Δ=PLAE\Delta = \dfrac{P L}{A E}

Bending Stiffness

  • For beams, bending rigidity: kbending=EILk_{\text{bending}} = \dfrac{E I}{L} ; slope/deflection vary with boundary conditions.

  • Handy mnemonic: larger II (strong axis) → dramatically lower mid-span deflection.

  • Weak vs strong axis illustrated; designers orient I-sections, rectangular beams, etc. to exploit strong axis inertia.

Standard Beam-Formula Extracts (Simply Supported Examples)

  • Concentrated load at centre: δmax=PL348EI\delta_{\max} = \dfrac{P L^{3}}{48 E I}

  • Concentrated load at arbitrary point aa from left support:
    δmax=Pab(2L22Lab2)6LEI\delta_{\max} = \dfrac{P a b ( 2 L^{2} - 2 L a - b^{2})}{6 L E I} where b=Lab = L - a; maximum often occurs under load if a > b.

  • Uniformly distributed load ww over entire span:
    δmax=5wL4384EI\delta_{\max} = \dfrac{5 w L^{4}}{384 E I}

  • End couple MM at right support (simply supported beam): central deflection δ=ML216EI\delta = \dfrac{M L^{2}}{16 E I}.

Deflection Exercise Snippet

  • Provided formula for rectangular section inertia: I=bd312I = \dfrac{b d^{3}}{12}

  • Reminder: depth has cubic influence → doubling depth cuts deflection by factor of 8 (all else equal).

Torsional Effects

  • Torsion in buildings arises when line of action of resultant wind (or seismic) load does not pass through the centre of stiffness (CS) of lateral-load-resisting system.

  • Consequences: differential lateral displacements, additional shear in members, discomfort, façade damage.

Design Principles to Minimise Torsion

  • Place shear walls, cores, braced frames symmetrically in plan with respect to both axes.

  • If asymmetry unavoidable, increase torsional stiffness of distant elements or add supplementary braces.

  • Always model 3-D behaviour; check drift and torsional amplification factors per code.

Centre of Stiffness Calculation (Illustrative Grid)

  • For walls W<em>1,W</em>2,W<em>3,W</em>4W<em>1, W</em>2, W<em>3, W</em>4 with stiffnesses K<em>iK<em>i and coordinates (x</em>i,y<em>i)(x</em>i, y<em>i): x</em>CS=K<em>ix</em>iK<em>i,y</em>CS=K<em>iy</em>iKix</em>{CS} = \dfrac{\sum K<em>i x</em>i}{\sum K<em>i}, \quad y</em>{CS} = \dfrac{\sum K<em>i y</em>i}{\sum K_i}

  • When wind resultant RR acts at (x<em>R,y</em>R)(x<em>R, y</em>R), torsional moment about CS: M<em>T=R×(x</em>Rx<em>CS)2+(y</em>RyCS)2M<em>T = R \times \sqrt{(x</em>R - x<em>{CS})^{2} + (y</em>R - y_{CS})^{2}}

Practical / Ethical / Philosophical Implications

  • Safety: misjudging global stability or torsional behaviour can lead to catastrophic failure; engineers have ethical duty to protect life.

  • Economy vs robustness: adding symmetric bracing may appear costly but prevents future retrofits or failures.

  • Architectural expression (e.g.e Centre Pompidou) shows structure but still obeys same physics; creativity must align with sound engineering.

Connections to Prior & Future Lectures

  • Builds on previous lecture’s load categorisation.

  • Next lecture will develop detailed load pathse tracing vertical & horizontal actions from application point to soil.

End-of-Lecture Summary

  • Structures = force-paths to ground.

  • Lateral systems (shear walls, braced frames, moment frames) resist horizontal loads; must ensure overall global stability.

  • Deflection depends on load magnitude, EE, and geometric properties A,IA, I.

  • Ability to compute deflection for standard cases critical for serviceability design.

  • Torsion appears when resultant lateral force and centre of stiffness misalign; design symmetrical layouts or compensate analytically.