STU 122 – Global Structural Behaviour (Theme 1 | Lecture 2)
Recap of Previous Concepts
Types of structural loads already covered in the course:
Dead load (DL)
Live load (LL)
Wind load (WL)
Seismic load (EL)
Others (snow, temperature, foundation settlement, etc.)
Structural design always combines loads so that the structure and its components avoid:
Loss of stability (global or local)
Collapse (ultimate limit state)
Excessive deflection or vibration (serviceability limit state)
Excessive cracking (serviceability & durability)
Essence of Structural Behaviour
Core purpose of every structural system: create a continuous path for forces to travel safely to the ground.
Famous architectural illustration: Centre Pompidou (Paris) shows clearly expressed structural and service pathways.
Practical takeaway: every beam, column, brace or wall serves as one link in that uninterrupted load path.
Loads on Building Structures
Two broad categories of actions acting on any building:
Internal / gravity related: floor loads, partitions, equipment, occupants, self-weight.
External / environmental: wind, earthquake, ground-induced movements, differential settlements.
Designer’s task: trace each individual load from its point of application through members → foundations → soil.
Global Stability
Stability deals with the building as a whole resisting sliding and overturning under combined vertical & horizontal loads.
Key horizontal actions considered: wind pressure, suction, uplift.
Failure modes examined:
Sliding (net horizontal reaction inadequate)
Overturning (moment equilibrium violated)
Fundamental equilibrium relationships (cantilever analogy):
Overturning moment:
Restoring moment (from vertical reactions):
For overall equilibrium:
Insight: increasing the lever arm of vertical reactions or reducing the lever arm of horizontal force lowers foundation reactions.
Comparative Study – Aspect Ratio Effects
Diagrams show three wall panels with same height but different base widths .
Thicker base (larger ) gives larger restoring lever arm → smaller required vertical reactions to resist same .
Rule of thumb: increasing base width is usually more efficient for stability than simply adding weight.
Rule of the Middle Third
For any prismatic block under combined vertical load and overturning moment , the resultant compressive stress distribution stays entirely compressive (no tension at base) if and only if the resultant vertical load falls within the middle third of the base.
Practical meaning:
Resultant eccentricity must satisfy where = base width.
Outside this zone, part of the base sees tension; if uplift occurs → potential rocking/overturning.
Stiffness and Deflection
Microscopic view: atomic “spring” model – tensile forces stretch bonds, compressive forces shorten them.
Macroscopic law: deflection is inversely proportional to stiffness.
Two governing ingredients of stiffness:
Material (modulus of elasticity )
Geometry (member area for axial; moment of inertia for bending; torsional constant for torsion)
Typical modulus values:
Steel:
Concrete: (depends on strength & age)
Timber: (species-dependent)
Axial Stiffness
Defined by:
Axial deflection of a prismatic bar:
Bending Stiffness
For beams, bending rigidity: ; slope/deflection vary with boundary conditions.
Handy mnemonic: larger (strong axis) → dramatically lower mid-span deflection.
Weak vs strong axis illustrated; designers orient I-sections, rectangular beams, etc. to exploit strong axis inertia.
Standard Beam-Formula Extracts (Simply Supported Examples)
Concentrated load at centre:
Concentrated load at arbitrary point from left support:
where ; maximum often occurs under load if a > b.Uniformly distributed load over entire span:
End couple at right support (simply supported beam): central deflection .
Deflection Exercise Snippet
Provided formula for rectangular section inertia:
Reminder: depth has cubic influence → doubling depth cuts deflection by factor of 8 (all else equal).
Torsional Effects
Torsion in buildings arises when line of action of resultant wind (or seismic) load does not pass through the centre of stiffness (CS) of lateral-load-resisting system.
Consequences: differential lateral displacements, additional shear in members, discomfort, façade damage.
Design Principles to Minimise Torsion
Place shear walls, cores, braced frames symmetrically in plan with respect to both axes.
If asymmetry unavoidable, increase torsional stiffness of distant elements or add supplementary braces.
Always model 3-D behaviour; check drift and torsional amplification factors per code.
Centre of Stiffness Calculation (Illustrative Grid)
For walls with stiffnesses and coordinates :
When wind resultant acts at , torsional moment about CS:
Practical / Ethical / Philosophical Implications
Safety: misjudging global stability or torsional behaviour can lead to catastrophic failure; engineers have ethical duty to protect life.
Economy vs robustness: adding symmetric bracing may appear costly but prevents future retrofits or failures.
Architectural expression (e.g.e Centre Pompidou) shows structure but still obeys same physics; creativity must align with sound engineering.
Connections to Prior & Future Lectures
Builds on previous lecture’s load categorisation.
Next lecture will develop detailed load pathse tracing vertical & horizontal actions from application point to soil.
End-of-Lecture Summary
Structures = force-paths to ground.
Lateral systems (shear walls, braced frames, moment frames) resist horizontal loads; must ensure overall global stability.
Deflection depends on load magnitude, , and geometric properties .
Ability to compute deflection for standard cases critical for serviceability design.
Torsion appears when resultant lateral force and centre of stiffness misalign; design symmetrical layouts or compensate analytically.