The American Revolution
The big question in this is why did the colonist revolt? It was separated in three different schools the economic, imperial, and ideological schools. One of the schools called imperial was extrinsic and revolted for the benefits of being free. Another school called ideological was intrinsic and revolted for the things of freedom itself. The imperial school revolted because they believed to own the land and be independent. They were autonomous and wanted to be self ruling which was patronism which basically meant they wanted the benefits of being free. They wanted a constitution relationship but the two wars were suspicious through 1763 in 1776 because first there was the end of the French war which caused the Indian/British war. When the French word was it through the colonies no longer needed protection from France but Britain still on the land. They’re saying they want independence but that doesn’t make any sense Because what they’re saying is it seems that it would be easy to take over the superpower of the world which was Britain and that would be suicide, so the counter argument was there was not enough cause for this war because they were doing OK they weren’t being messed with I had to fight anybody they just wanted to be by themselves and that’s not enough to cause some body to do suicid . The second school was the end economic school and it was called that because the founding fathers conspired to become rich by convincing the masses that Britain would eventually make them dirt poor. The founding fathers and the pamphleteers lived on the coast, which would make them rich if they owned the land. Because the coast land has shipping and merautilism. We know all revolution wars were about money therefore this one had to be about money too mathematically, But in this particular history it’s not true because they didn’t actually live on the coast. This is also not true because they were not dirt poor they said they would eventually become dirt poor which means they’re doing good now. This means that they would not start a revolution at that time just because they would become very poor just because they would does it mean they are that would be killing for nothing that be greed just for more money. The third school ideological they wanted to protect their unalienable rights in the idea was that they would fight for limited government and uphold the social contract to be free. The defense is this is what they said with also 5000 Pamphteers. The only counter argument is that it will be too good to be true. They lied and it’s too good to be true. That can only be the counter argument because there’s 5000 people that want this and say this is true. Basically they’re all saying they were treated badly and want to revolt against the Great Britain basically the king and his army. The land proclamation act of 1763 What is that the colonies cannot cross the mountains one because of the Native Americans and two because of the mercantilism which meant they can’t be too far from Britain.
The big question in this is why did the colonist revolt? It was separated in three different schools the economic, imperial, and ideological schools. One of the schools called imperial was extrinsic and revolted for the benefits of being free. Another school called ideological was intrinsic and revolted for the things of freedom itself. The imperial school revolted because they believed to own the land and be independent. They were autonomous and wanted to be self ruling which was patronism which basically meant they wanted the benefits of being free. They wanted a constitution relationship but the two wars were suspicious through 1763 in 1776 because first there was the end of the French war which caused the Indian/British war. When the French word was it through the colonies no longer needed protection from France but Britain still on the land. They’re saying they want independence but that doesn’t make any sense Because what they’re saying is it seems that it would be easy to take over the superpower of the world which was Britain and that would be suicide, so the counter argument was there was not enough cause for this war because they were doing OK they weren’t being messed with I had to fight anybody they just wanted to be by themselves and that’s not enough to cause some body to do suicid . The second school was the end economic school and it was called that because the founding fathers conspired to become rich by convincing the masses that Britain would eventually make them dirt poor. The founding fathers and the pamphleteers lived on the coast, which would make them rich if they owned the land. Because the coast land has shipping and merautilism. We know all revolution wars were about money therefore this one had to be about money too mathematically, But in this particular history it’s not true because they didn’t actually live on the coast. This is also not true because they were not dirt poor they said they would eventually become dirt poor which means they’re doing good now. This means that they would not start a revolution at that time just because they would become very poor just because they would does it mean they are that would be killing for nothing that be greed just for more money. The third school ideological they wanted to protect their unalienable rights in the idea was that they would fight for limited government and uphold the social contract to be free. The defense is this is what they said with also 5000 Pamphteers. The only counter argument is that it will be too good to be true. They lied and it’s too good to be true. That can only be the counter argument because there’s 5000 people that want this and say this is true. Basically they’re all saying they were treated badly and want to revolt against the Great Britain basically the king and his army. The land proclamation act of 1763 What is that the colonies cannot cross the mountains one because of the Native Americans and two because of the mercantilism which meant they can’t be too far from Britain.
