Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person
Focus: understanding arguments and opinions about human nature.
Key idea: evaluate how arguments are formed and whether they rely on sound reasoning.
Arguments
Arguments are statements that are either claims of facts and are phrased to seem reasonable.
Purpose: provide reasons to support a claim.
Fallacies (overview)
Fallacies are errors in reasoning that undermine arguments.
Common types present in the material:
Argumentum ad Hominem
Argumentum ad Baculum
Argumentum ad Misericordiam
Argumentum ad Populum
Argumentum ad Traditio
Begging the question
Cause-and-Effect fallacies
Fallacy of Composition
Fallacy of Division
Fallacies Argumentum ad Hominem
Definition: Attacking the Person (Homo means man).
Concept: Refocuses on the individual instead of the argument.
Examples:
"How can we believe him when he talks about social distancing, he is a lawyer who is a liar."
"We shouldn’t listen to Anna’s opinion on climate change because she didn’t even finish college."
Fallacies Argumentum ad Baculum
Definition: Appeal to Force (threats or coercion).
Concept: Uses threat to win agreement rather than argument.
Examples:
"You better agree that our new manager is the best, or you’ll be on my bad side and you know what happens to people I don’t like."
"If this peace agreement will not be signed by the government, then we will have no resource but to go to war."
"If you don’t vote for me as a club president, I’ll make sure you’ll have no friends anymore."
Fallacies Argumentum ad Misericordiam
Definition: Appeal to Pity/Emotion.
Concept: Manipulates emotions to win assent.
Examples:
"You need to pass me in this course, since I’ll lose my scholarship if you don’t."
Dog example: "You should adopt this dog. If no one takes him home today, he’ll be put down tomorrow."
"Please don’t give me a zero. My parents will punish me severely if they see a low grade."
Fallacies Argumentum ad Populum
Definition: Appeal to People/ to the popular.
Concept: Claim is acceptable because many people believe it.
Examples:
"Almost 80% of your schoolmates are using it."
"Everyone drives over the speed limit, so it should not be against the law."
"Millions of people believe in horoscopes, so they must be true."
Fallacies Argumentum ad Traditio
Definition: Appeal to Tradition.
Concept: Justifies an idea because it has long been practiced.
Examples:
"Marriage should be between a man and a woman. It has been so for a long time in this country; it should remain so today and in the future."
"All of us in the family, from our ancestors up to now, are devout Catholics, so it is only right that you will be baptized as a Catholic."
"We shouldn’t change the school uniform policy, it’s been the same for 500 years."
Cause-and-Effect Fallacies
Definition: Assuming a cause-and-effect relationship between unrelated events.
Examples:
"Ever since you bought that sweater, everything has been going wrong in your life. You should get rid of it."
"Whenever I wear my lucky jersey, my team loses. So it must actually be my unlucky jersey!"
"I wore my lucky socks to the exam and got a high score. The socks must have helped me pass!"
"Every time I bring my umbrella with me, it rains. Clearly, if I leave it at home, there will be sunshine."
Fallacy of Composition
Definition: Assuming that what is true of a part is true for the whole.
Examples:
"This house is made of bricks. A brick is light in weight. Therefore, this house is also light in weight."
"Each player on the basketball team is excellent, so the team must be unbeatable."
"These cases of robbery in this district have convinced me that that city has become a den of thieves and criminals."
Fallacy of Division
Definition: Assuming that what is true for the whole is true for its parts.
Examples:
"This company is very rich, so every employee must be rich too."
"The cake is sweet, so each ingredient like flour and eggs must be sweet too."
"The United States is the richest country in the world. Therefore, everyone in the United States must be rich and live well."
Begging the Question (Circular Argument)
Definition: Premises assume the truth of the conclusion, rather than supporting it.
Examples:
"You should trust me because I’m trustworthy." (circular)
"Snakes make great pets. That’s why we should get a snake." (premises presume conclusion)
Cartoon example: "CLEAN UP THIS MESS! BUT WHY? BECAUSE IT NEEDS TO BE CLEANED." (circular reasoning)