Attitudes
Page 1: Introduction
Topic: Social Psychology
Focus: Attitudes
Location: NYU London
Period: Spring 2025
Sessions: 9 & 10
Page 2: Key Questions
How do attitudes shape our behavior?
How do we change our attitudes?
How do others persuade us to change our attitudes?
Main Themes:
Attitudes & Behavior
Persuasion
Cognitive Dissonance
Overview of Attitudes
Page 3: Overview
Topics Covered:
Attitudes & Behavior
Influence of Attitudes on Behavior
Persuasion and Cognitive Dissonance
Definition of Attitudes
Page 4: Definition of Attitudes
Definition:
An attitude is a psychological tendency expressed by evaluating a particular entity with favor or disfavor (Eagly & Chaiken, 1998).
Types of Attitudes:
Explicit Attitudes: Consciously accessible and easy to report.
Implicit Attitudes: Unconscious associations between objects and evaluative responses.
Page 5: The ABC of Attitudes
Components of Attitudes:
Affective: Feelings associated with the attitude (e.g., happiness from recycling).
Behavioral: Actions taken (e.g., regularly recycling).
Cognitive: Beliefs held (e.g., belief that recycling is responsible).
Source: Fishbein & Ajzen (1975)
Page 6: Attitudes and Behavior
Study by Richard LaPiere (1930s):
Road trip with a Chinese couple resulted in courteous treatment at 184 establishments.
Follow-up correspondence revealed 92% of establishments would not serve Chinese customers.
Conclusion: Suggests a gap between attitudes and actual behaviors.
Page 7: Theory of Planned Behavior
Key Variables Affecting Attitude-Behavior Link:
1. Attitude Toward Behavior: Stronger attitudes influence behavior.
2. Subjective Norms: Support from valued others.
3. Perceived Behavioral Control: Belief in one's ability to perform the behavior.
Source: Fishbein & Ajzen (1975)
Page 8: Components of the Theory of Planned Behavior - Part 1
Illustrative Statements:
“Most of my friends do not smoke.”
“Smoking is bad for me.”
“I’m going to give up smoking.”
Page 9: Components of the Theory of Planned Behavior - Part 2
Addition of Perceived Behavioral Control:
“I’m capable of giving up.”
Page 10: Exercise
Task: Describe a behavior explained by the Theory of Planned Behavior, including components such as attitudes, subjective norms, intentions, and perceived behavioral control.
Page 11: Interim Summary
Summary of Key Points:
Attitudes consist of affective, behavioral, and cognitive components.
Attitudes influence behavior through intentions filtered by perceived subjective norms.
Intentions can enhance perceived behavioral control.
Page 12: When Do We Change Our Attitudes?
Topics Covered:
Cognitive Dissonance
Post-decisional Dissonance
Dissonance & Culture
Page 13: Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Key Insights from Festinger (1957):
Individuals strive for consistency among beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors.
Inconsistency leads to cognitive dissonance, which motivates re-alignment efforts.
Methods to achieve alignment:
Change behavior to align with attitude
Change attitude to suit behavior
Page 14: Defining Cognitive Dissonance
Definition:
An internal state resulting from inconsistencies between two or more attitudes or between attitudes and behavior.
Effect: Discrepant behavior leads to lowered self-worth and changes in thoughts and feelings.
Page 15: Festinger & Carlsmith Study (1959)
Participants: 71 male Stanford University students.
Procedure: Perform a boring task, then persuade others it was enjoyable. Participants received either $20 or $1 for their efforts.
Dependent Variable: Self-reported enjoyment of the task.
Page 16: Findings from cognitive dissonance study
Conclusion:
Greater dissonance (small payment) led to more attitude change and altered behavioral intentions.
Page 17: Post-decisional Dissonance
Concept of Buyer’s Remorse:
Regret felt post-decision.
Dissonance encourages thinking positively about the chosen alternative, while downplaying rejected options.
Source: Brehm (1956)
Page 18: Mechanisms of Post-decisional Dissonance
Concept:
It’s a strategy to reduce attitudes for alternatives not chosen.
Page 19: Summary on Cognitive Dissonance
Key Points:
Cognitive dissonance arises from inconsistencies between attitudes or between attitudes and behaviors.
It is generally easier to change attitudes rather than behavior.
Cultural differences exist; Westerners often experience more cognitive dissonance than East Asians, especially related to self-esteem.
Page 20: Ways Others Persuade Us to Change Attitudes
Topics Covered:
The Source of Information
The Message Content
Real-life Persuasion Examples
Page 21: The Source of Persuasion
Factors Increasing Persuasiveness:
Communicators who are attractive
Communicators who share similarities (values/beliefs) with the audience
Experts or confident communicators who present clearly
Page 22: The Message of Persuasion
Effectiveness Factors:
Positive and happy messages can enhance persuasion (Sinclair et al., 1994)
Emotional appeals through fear can draw attention; however, excessive fear may disengage the audience (Das et al., 2003; Shehryar & Hunt, 2005)
Page 23: Petty et al. (1981) Study on Persuasion
Participants: 145 undergraduate students.
Independent Variables:
Argument Quality (strong vs weak)
Source Expertise (expert vs non-expert)
Personal Relevance (high vs low)
Dependent Variable: Attitudes measured on multiple dimensions.
Page 24: Findings on Personal Relevance
Key Insight:
Messages with high personal relevance are generally more persuasive.
Page 25: Findings Related to Source Credibility
Key Insight:
Sources are more persuasive in low personal relevance contexts.
Page 26: Techniques in Persuasion
Techniques Explained:
Foot-in-the-door: Start with a small request, followed by a larger one.
Bait-and-switch: Advertised low price but product is unavailable.
Pre-giving: Sending unsolicited gifts before requesting donations.
Page 27: Effective Advertising
Insight:
Advertising is effective in changing attitudes through both peripheral and central routes.
The message source and quality significantly influence attitude shifts.
Page 28: Take-Home Message
Key Concepts to Remember:
Attitudes
Attitudes & Behavior
Cognitive Dissonance
Persuasion
Page 29: References
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Post-decision changes in desirability of alternatives.
Cialdini, R. (2001). Influence: Science and Practice (4th ed.).
Eagly & Chaiken (1998). Handbook of Social Psychology.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior.
LaPiere, R. T. (1936). Type rationalization of group antipathy.
Page 30: Additional References
Olson, et al. (2001). The heritability of attitudes.
Petty, et al. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion.
Schifter & Ajzen (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss.
Tormala, et al. (2006). Impacts of source credibility on persuasion.