Three Pillars of Stability in Autocratic Regimes
Three Pillars of Autocratic Stability
Introduction
Explains the longevity of autocracies using three pillars: "Legitimation, Repression, and Co-optation".
These pillars develop over time through reinforcement processes.
Exogenous reinforcement: Powered by available resources.
Self-reinforcement: Triggers path-dependency.
Reciprocal reinforcement: Leads to complementarity.
Research Waves
Totalitarianism Paradigm (1930s-1960s):
Key factors were ideology and terror.
Rise of Authoritarianism (1960s-1980s):
Emphasis on socio-economic factors.
Renaissance of Autocracy Studies (1999-Present):
Focus on strategic repression and co-optation.
The Concepts
Legitimation:
Gaining support based on “legitimacy belief”.
Seeks active "consent, compliance, obedience, or toleration."
Diffuse support: Stemming from ideologies, religion, nationalism, charisma, or external threats.
Specific support: Addressing demands for socio-economic development and security.
Measurement:
Specific: GDP growth, HDI, etc.
Diffuse: Protests (or lack of, discounting for repression), expert assessments, content analysis of official claims
Repression:
Use of "physical sanctions to impose costs and deter activities."
High intensity: Violent repression of demonstrations, campaigns against parties, imprisonment of leaders.
Low intensity: "Surveillance, intimidation, denial of opportunities, curtailment of political rights."
Measurement:
Freedom house Indicators.
Cingranelli-Richards Human Rights Dataset.
Political Terror Scale Project
Co-optation:
Tying strategically-relevant actors to the regime elite.
Ensures "intra-elite cohesion and steering capacity."
Formal channels: Parliaments, parties, elections.
Informal ways: Patronage, clientelism, corruption.
Measurement:
Degree of institutionalization.
Stabilization Process
Exogenous Reinforcement:
Dependent on available power and material resources.
Endogenous Self-Reinforcement:
Legitimation: Reinforces itself via supporting attitudes.
Network good connected to high initial start-up costs that trigger subsequent investments
Repression: Reproduces power asymmetries.
Learning and coordination effects that are self-reinforcing
Co-optation: Strategic action where elites weigh costs and benefits.
High fixed/setup costs amortized with growing numbers.
Learning/coordination effects increase efficiency.
Adaptive expectations and network effects.
Reciprocal Reinforcement:
Complementarity between the pillars.
Elite cohesion complementary to managing oppositional demands.
Two hypothesized stable configurations: