Lec (4): Distance/Size, Top down influences, Ecological approach
Introduction to Visual Ambiguities
Focus on distance and size ambiguities resolution.
Discuss influences on visual perception, particularly top-down processes.
Importance of external visual information in resolving ambiguities.
Distance and Size Cues
Conceptual Framework
Distance and size ambiguities are resolved through the combination of visual clues.
Types of visual cues:
Motor cues.
Cues from retinal imagery.
Additional observational clues.
Motor Cues
Eye Movement Cues:
The Okamoto Kiehl's Wear Vision System illustrates how eye muscle movement helps infer distance.
Accommodation:
Movement of the lens thickens to focus on nearby objects.
Convergence:
The inward movement of eyes (crossing) indicates close proximity of objects.
Retinal Imagery Cues
Different Perspectives:
Rapidly switching between eyes shows differing perspectives when objects are near (greater disparity).
Distant objects present less difference between left and right perspectives, helping gauge distance.
Additional Cues for Distance and Size
Familiar Size:
Past experiences help gauge the size of objects; for example, estimating the height of distant buildings.
Pictorial Cues:
Spatial orientation of lines aids in estimating depth.
Smaller angles signify greater distances.
Relative Height:
Objects appearing lower in an image are perceived as closer.
Linear Perspective:
Parallel lines converge at a vanishing point, indicating distance.
Atmospheric Cues:
Far-away objects may appear hazy or bluish, suggesting greater distance.
Top-Down Processing
Overview of Processing Methods
Bottom-Up Processing:
Sensory information is processed and recognized by the system in a linear flow.
Contextual Influence:
Prior knowledge influences how sensory information is interpreted (top-down processing).
Experiment by Steven Palmore (1975)
Participants view a kitchen scene with jagged objects.
Results: 80% correctly identify a loaf of bread, lower for the mailbox and drone due to contextual recognition.
Conclusion:
Context is crucial in visual processing, demonstrating the importance of both bottom-up and top-down processing.
Pawson Paradox
Example of letters A, B, and C as parts of Abraham Lincoln's face.
Recognition occurs better collectively than in isolation, illustrating simultaneous reliance on both processing types.
Ecological Approach to Visual Processing
Critique of Inferential Approach
Inferential approach emphasizes reliance on assumptions, considering retinal images as poor world representations.
Emphasizes the necessity for meaningful interpretations of visual stimuli.
Ecological Perspective
Touts environmental information availability reducing assumptions needed in interpretation.
Examples of Ecological Information Sources
Object Size:
Estimation of tree size by contextually interpreting horizon lines (intersecting at the middle), even subconsciously.
The integration of ecological and inferential approaches enhances object size/distance determination.
Motion and Optical Flow:
Moving towards a point alters relative points of light (vector flow field).
Visual perception allows relative motion interpretation (e.g., mountains appearing slower moving compared to fields).
Conclusion
Preview of upcoming video on face and familiar object recognition and processing differences.