28233 - Cell disruption

DTU Overview

Course Information

  • Course Title: DTU 28233 - Recovery and Purification of Biological Products

  • Instructor: Yannick Patrice Didion (ypadi@kt.dtu.dk)

  • Date: [Insert Date]

Biological Product Recovery

Intracellular vs Extracellular Production

  • Extracellular Production:

    • Involves secretion machinery within the cell.

    • Risks include potential damage from proteases and external factors like pH.

    • Refolding may be necessary to restore biological activity.

  • Intracellular Production:

    • Requires cell disruption to isolate from cell debris, adding complexity to process.

    • Typically limited to concentrations of ~20% of cell protein (approx. 10% of dry mass).

    • Some polymers can accumulate to over 70% of dry cell mass.

Desired Outcomes

  • It is generally preferred to have bio-products secreted (exocytosis) since this reduces downstream processing steps and overall costs.

  • However, certain organisms lack a secretion machinery, necessitating additional processes like cell disruption and flocculation for effective extraction and purification.

Process Design for Downstream Processing (DSP)

  • Design Considerations:

    • Understand nature of products: high priced vs low priced, low molecular weight (MW) vs high MW.

    • Processing steps differ for extracellular vs intracellular products.

Cell Separation Steps

  • Extracellular: Cell separation and isolation.

  • Intracellular: Recovery, disruption, isolation, purification, and polishing.

Cell Disruption Techniques

Overview

  • Cell disruption is a crucial operation in bioprocesses when intracellular proteins must be released.

  • Methods can be mechanical or enzymatic/chemical.

  • At large scales, mechanical disruption using high-pressure homogenizers is standard.

Factors Influencing Method Choice

  • Cell Wall Structure: Resistance to disruption varies significantly, particularly in bacterial cells due to peptidoglycan layers.

  • Product Characteristics: Physical and chemical properties of the target product.

  • Contaminants: Consider how cell disruption may impact subsequent recovery steps.

Types of Cell Walls in Bacteria

  • Gram-positive Bacteria:

    • Susceptible to lysozyme; consist mainly of peptidoglycan (15-50 nm thick).

    • Simpler structure compared to Gram-negative bacteria.

  • Gram-negative Bacteria:

    • Characterized by an outer membrane that excludes certain compounds (e.g., penicillin).

    • Composed of lipopolysaccharides and have a thinner peptidoglycan layer.

Recovery of Inclusion Bodies

  • Inclusion bodies are aggregates of insoluble proteins in bacteria that need to be recovered during downstream processing.

Disruption in Eukaryotic Cells

  • Eukaryotic cells are more complex than bacterial cells, making them generally easier to disrupt (e.g., mammalian cells) than plant cells which have strong cell walls.

Lysis/Ease of Disruption by Cell Type

  • Various cell types rated on ease of mechanical disruption:

    • Mammalian cells: 7 (easily disrupted)

    • Yeast: 3

    • Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: 2-5 (increasing difficulty)

Common Cell Disruption Techniques

  • Chemical: Osmotic shock, enzyme digestion, solubilization.

  • Mechanical: Homogenization, grinding, ultrasonication, bead beating.

Osmotic Shock

  • Drastic reductions in extracellular solute concentrations can burst cells, especially those without walls or those weakened by antibiotics.

Enzyme Digestion

  • Lysozyme effectively digests Gram-positive bacteria. For Gram-negative bacteria, outer membrane defenses require chelating agents for effective processing.

Solubilization

  • Detergents like Triton-X and Tween can lyse plasma membranes of mammalian cells; less damaging than ionic detergents.

High-Pressure Homogenization

  • A continuous process that can reach pressures of 1500 bar (21750 psi), leading to efficient product release.

  • Multiple passes can enhance product recovery.

Ultrasonication

  • Uses sound waves to disrupt cells but generates heat, necessitating careful monitoring and cooling during the process.

Assessing Disruption Success

  • Methods include direct counting (microscopy), laser particle sizing, and indirect measurements (protein concentration).

Summary

  • Cell disruption is essential for extracting intracellular compounds. Multiple methods exist depending on the product, its stability, and shear sensitivity. Success can be evaluated through a variety of analytical methods.