Sentencing

Sentencing

Purpose and Principles of Sentencing

  1. Denunciation of unlawful and harmful conduct

    • Purpose is to publicly condemn wrongful actions that are harmful.

  2. Deterrence

    • Aimed at dissuading individuals from committing offenses; can be general (deter society) or specific (deter the individual).

  3. Separation from society

    • Involves isolating the offender to protect the community and prevent further harm.

  4. Rehabilitation

    • Focused on reforming the offender to reintegrate them into society as a law-abiding citizen.

  5. Reparation

    • The offender is required to make amends for the harm caused to victims.

  6. Promoting a sense of responsibility

    • Encourages offenders to acknowledge their wrongdoing and its impact on others.

  7. Proportionality

    • Sentencing must be proportionate to the severity of the crime and the responsibility of the offender.

  8. Principle of restraint

    • Courts should impose the least severe sentence necessary to achieve the aims of sentencing.

Goals of Sentencing

  1. Utilitarian Goals

    • General Deterrence: Helps prevent future crime by others in society.

    • Specific Deterrence: Affects only the individual offender to prevent recidivism.

    • Rehabilitation: Focused on fixing underlying issues leading to criminal behavior.

    • Incapacitation: Seeks to physically remove the offender from society to prevent harm.

  2. Retributive Goals

    • Denunciation: Social condemnation of the crime.

    • Retribution: Seeking vengeance for the crime committed and ensuring justice is served.

  3. Restorative Goals

    • Focuses on resolving problems associated with the crime; aims to involve the offender, victim, and community in the restorative process.

Sentencing Options

  1. Discharge

    • Absolute Discharge: Offender is found guilty but not convicted; record removed after one year.

    • Conditional Discharge: Offender must comply with probation conditions, or face further penalties.

  2. Fine

    • Obligation to pay a specified amount of money within a defined period; failure results in imprisonment.

  3. Forfeiture

    • Offenders may have to surrender criminal proceeds to the Crown (government).

  4. Prohibitions

    • Court-imposed conditions that restrict certain activities, possession, or relationships.

  5. Suspended Sentence

    • Conviction exists but sentence is suspended pending compliance with conditions, usually probation.

  6. Conditional Sentence

    • Offender serves their sentence in the community under supervision instead of in jail.

  7. Intermittent Sentence

    • Custodial sentence served part-time, typically not exceeding 90 days.

  8. Imprisonment

    • Offender is sentenced to serve time in either a provincial or federal institution.

Sentencing Options Continued

  1. Concurrent Sentences

    • Sentences served simultaneously, allowing for more than one offense's punishment to occur at the same time (Criminal Code, 1985).

  2. Consecutive Sentences

    • Sentences served one after another; this approach is taken under circumstances outlined in the Provincial Offences Act (1990) and the Protecting Canadians by Ending Sentence Discounts for Multiple Murders Act (2011).

Sentencing Considerations

TABLE 9.2: Sentencing Considerations
  • Aggravating Factors

    • Negative factors that increase sentence severity (e.g., violence, exploiting authority).

  • Mitigating Factors

    • Factors that may decrease the sentence severity (e.g., Indigenous status, addiction issues).

  • Case Law Precedents

    • Previous similar sentences influential in current decisions; important for ensuring fairness and consistency.

  • Pre-Sentence Reports (PSRs)

    • Prepared by probation officers, summarizing offender’s background, situation, and risks; helps inform sentencing options.

  • Victim Impact Statements

    • Detail the psychological and physical harm to the victim and the overall consequences experienced.

  • Psychological Assessments

    • Evaluate offenders' mental states and treatment needs.

  • Consideration of Indigenous Offenders

    • Section 718.2(e) requires alternative considerations for Indigenous offenders to avoid automatic incarceration.

  • Cultural Assessments for Black Offenders

    • Increasingly requested legal evaluations to address the specific contexts affecting black offenders.

Dangerous Offender Designation

  1. First Threshold

    • Offender has committed at least one serious personal injury offense.

  2. Second Threshold

    • Established pattern indicating difficulty in controlling behavior; constitutes a threat to life, safety, or well-being of others.

Long-Term Offender Designation

  1. Legal Provision

    • Section 753 of the Criminal Code allows for designating someone as a long-term offender.

  2. Eligibility Requirements

    • Offender must have received a sentence longer than two years and pose a substantial risk of reoffending after release.

  3. Supervision

    • Long-term supervision order will result in up to 10 years of monitoring by a parole officer after completing the sentence.

Sentencing Indigenous Offenders

  • Specific considerations in sentencing Indigenous offenders, promoting culturally appropriate approaches and understanding the community context.

Judicial Decision-Making

  1. Three Important Steps

    • Identify relevant factors in the case.

    • Identify applicable law that governs the case.

    • Combine factual circumstances with law to achieve a just outcome in sentencing.

Statutory Guidance on Sentencing

  • Section 718.1 of the Criminal Code states that the fundamental principle of sentencing is proportionality; the sentence must reflect the crime's gravity and the offender's responsibility level.

Limits on Judicial Discretion

  • Under section 718.2(b), similar crimes by similar offenders in comparable circumstances should incur similar sentences; this principle is vital for preserving consistency in judicial outcomes.

Victim Impact Statements

  • Importance of victim impact statements in the sentencing process; narratives by victims that reflect the profound effects of crime.

Circle Sentencing

TABLE 9.3: Differences Between Criminal Court and Circle Sentencing Principles
  • Criminal Court Principles

    • Crime defined narrowly; resolution focuses on sentencing.

    • Emphasis on past wrongful conduct, not on social conflict.

    • The sentence is the critical part of the process.

  • Circle Sentencing Principles

    • Crime seen within the larger context of societal conflict.

    • Sentencing considered only a fraction of the broader resolution process.

    • Forward-looking focus on future behavior.

    • Emphasizes social harmony and relationships over punitive outcomes.

    • Process is paramount; fosters interrelations among all stakeholders involved in the case.