NATURAL JUSTICE AND LEGAL JUSTICE
NATURAL JUSTICE AND LEGAL JUSTICE
Definition of Natural Justice:
- Natural justice in its broadest sense means the inherent understanding of what is right and wrong.
- In a technical context, it equates with fairness.
Significance of Natural Justice in Administrative Law:
- Defined as a crucial concept in administrative law, encompassing two fundamental rules:
- No person should be a judge in their own cause.
- Everyone's defense must be heard fairly.
- These rules are not limited to judicial settings but apply to administrative processes and certain contractual powers.
Judicial and Administrative Considerations:
- The expectation to adhere to natural justice principles is assumed in courts and statutory tribunals.
- Natural justice applies universally, indicating its fundamental nature in any authoritative decision-making process.
Narrow vs. Broad Aspects of Natural Justice:
Narrow Aspect:
Rules of natural justice are considered a subset of the principle of ultra vires.
Violations of natural justice represent a form of improper procedure or abuse of power, breaching the implied intentions of Parliament.
Broad Aspect:
Natural justice encompasses concepts beyond mere legality, focusing on inherent morality and fairness in decision-making.
Limitations of Power and Fair Procedures:
- Powers exercised must align with reasonable standards and good faith.
- Quotation from Lord Selborne:
- "There would be no decision within the meaning of the statute if there were anything of that sort done contrary to the essence of justice."
Types of Justifications for Procedural Justice:
- Instrumental Justifications:
- Focus on effectiveness and efficiency in applying rules.
- Non-Instrumental Justifications:
- Emphasizing respect and dignity for individuals involved in the process.
References for Further Reading:
- Galligan's work on due process and fair procedures.
- Elliott, Beatson, Matthews, and Elliott's Administrative Law Text and Materials (4th edition).
Relevant Case Law:
- Reference to Osborn v. The Parole Board ([2013] UKSC 61) highlighting case law surrounding natural justice.
- In Home Secretary v. AF and anor ([2009] UKHL 28), Lord Phillips discussed the tension between fair procedures (non-instrumental) and those producing fair outcomes (instrumental).
Historical Case Citations:
- Spackman v. Plumstead District Board of Works (1885) 10 App Cas 229 at 240—important precedent contributing to the legal framework surrounding natural justice.
- Voinet v. Barrett (1885) 55 LJQB 39 at 41—establishes legal principles concerning natural justice and procedural fairness.