Summary of Online Censorship and Surveillance in Myanmar
Introduction
Overview of online censorship and surveillance in Myanmar.
Author: Phyu Phyu Kyaw, November 2020.
Research Background
Study aims to understand government and military technologies/strategies for surveillance and censorship.
Focus on both online and offline spaces, with methodologies including network measurements and interviews.
Political Context
Military rule from 1962 to 2011, followed by influenced democratic processes.
Ongoing civil war and significant issues relating to the Rohingya crisis.
Online Connectivity
Internet access improved since 2011; however, surveillance, censorship, and rights abuses persist.
Government established a Social Media Monitoring Team (SMMT) for state stability.
Methodology Overview
Three-step research process:
Gather public information (monitoring government/media).
Device testing and network measurements.
Conducting interviews with at-risk individuals.
Findings on Censorship
230 websites blocked by March 2020, including media outlets covering sensitive issues.
Various censorship techniques employed across different ISPs in Myanmar.
Surveillance Capacity
Utilization of tools like Cellebrite by the military.
Integration of psychological warfare units spreading disinformation through social media.
Internet Restrictions
Internet shutdowns in conflict areas—especially Rakhine and Chin states—since June 2019.
Reasons for shutdowns tied to security claims against armed groups like the Arakan Army.
Interview Insights
Interviews with 24 individuals showed feelings of insecurity both online and offline.
Self-censorship prevalent among activists, journalists due to fear of surveillance/harassment.
Legal and Psychological Concerns
Weak legal frameworks lead to harassment of activists; existing laws are overly broad.
Psychological well-being of activists compromised due to constant threats and intimidation.
Conclusion and Future Directions
Rising censorship and surveillance threaten fundamental rights in Myanmar.
Need for legal reforms, enhanced protection for activists, and comprehensive digital safety measures.