Chapter 11 In-Depth Notes on Research Designs
Other Types of Research Designs
Types: Single-case, quasi-experimental, developmental research
Purpose:
Single-case: For specific individual problems
Quasi-experimental: When random assignment is impractical or unethical
Single-case Experimental Designs
Common Use: In behavioral research
Focus: Influence of factors on target behaviors (e.g., child behavior, student learning, disorders)
Process: Baseline → manipulation → reestablish baseline
Note: Not to be confused with case studies (which are observational)
Example of Idealized Data
Baseline Data Points:
Tantrums
Picking up after dog
Disruptions in class
Snacking behaviors
Study by Sil et al. (2012)
Subject: Distraction for preschoolers during burn dressing changes
Conditions: Watching vs. playing a video game (same child)
Outcomes: OSBD Procedural Distress Scores across sessions
Passive vs. Interactive distraction
Single-case Experimental Designs (Additional Detail)
Reversal Design: Addresses confounds with co-occurring events
A-B-A Design: Baseline (A) → Treatment (B) → Baseline (A)
Can extend to A-B-A-B or more
Examples of Potential Confounds
Types of Confounds:
Tantrums linked to co-occurring parent actions
Phone use impacting interest in a movie scene
Classroom disruptions linked to shifts in teacher topics
Analyzing Trends
Trend Lines can indicate changes independent of interventions
Variability: Can reveal existing trends before interventions occur
ABA Design Applications
Can test hypothetical scenarios such as the effects of removing distractions or changing environmental factors
Ethical Considerations for Reversal Designs
Appropriate Uses: Non-dangerous situations like classroom behaviors
Inappropriate Uses: Dangerous conditions like self-harm or addiction
Multiple Baseline Designs
Concept: Introduce interventions at different times to observe effects
Purpose: Supports causal inferences regarding behavior changes
Example: Effects of smoking during pregnancy on fetuses noted through ultrasound changes
Study by Alvero & Austin (2004)
Focus: Workplace safety behaviors across 8 students in a controlled environment
Behaviors Emphasized: Proper lifting techniques, sitting posture, and phone use ergonomics
Intervention Types:
Information sheet outlining safety procedures
Observation and checklist evaluations of behaviors
Results from Alvero & Austin Study
Percentages of Safe Practices Monitored Over Time:
Data shown for interventions such as information sessions vs. observational learning
Behavior Change Strategies
Communicative Approaches: Using positive reinforcement for desired behaviors, such as increased glove usage for safety
Study by Perrin et al. (2011)
Investigated procrastination among graduate students over 10 weeks
Access to Quizzes: Noncontingent vs. contingent access methods
Findings: Significantly higher gains in scores were noted for students with contingent access to quizzes
Importance of Changing-Criterion Designs
Purpose: Gradually shift criteria to improve behaviors over time, illustrated with token systems
Various Reinforcement Schedules
Types:
Fixed Ratio: Predictable reward (e.g., jack-in-the-box)
Variable Ratio: Unpredictable reward (e.g., slot machines)
Fixed Interval: Time-based (e.g., toaster)
Variable Interval: Randomized timing (e.g., first behavior after a period)
Replications in Single-case Designs
Important for establishing reliability and control in experimental procedures
Quasi-experimental Designs
Lack of random assignment; valuable in applied settings (e.g., classrooms, workplaces)
One-group Designs
Posttest-only design: Lacks comparison group; limited causal inferences
Pretest-posttest design: Comparison before and after manipulation, though subject to various confounding problems
Challenges in One-group Designs
Issue Types:
History effects: External events during the study
Maturation effects: Natural changes over time
Testing effects: Influence of pretests on participant behavior
Instrument decay: Changes in measurement effectiveness
Regression toward the mean: Trends towards average scores
Nonequivalent Control Group Designs
Compares experimental group with a non-randomized control group; still faces confounding risks due to selection biases
Interrupted Time Series Design
Monitors variable over time before and after manipulation; can suffer from misinterpretation biases
Developmental Research Designs
Methods to study age-related changes:
Cross-sectional Method: Observing different age groups at one point in time
Longitudinal Method: Following the same individuals over a period
Sequential Method: Combination of both methods to enhance reliability
Longitudinal and Sequential Advantages
Better control of confounding variables and provides insight into longitudinal changes of behavior across age groups.
Attrition: Considerations and challenges of maintaining participant groups over time
Summary of Developmental Changes through Sequential Studies
Notable trends in self-esteem and other behavioral attributes through observational designs.
Conclusion on Experimental Research Designs
Each design has unique strengths and limitations depending on the context and ethical considerations of the research setting.