CSR Notes

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Two Views on CSR

  • Friedman's View (Free Market Economies):

    • Property Conception: A firm is a collection of assets owned by stockholders.

    • A firm's primary duty is profit maximization.

    • The firm must obey the law and avoid fraud.

  • Socioeconomic Conception:

    • The firm is part of a wider society.

    • It has a duty to promote a healthy and prosperous society as a corporate citizen.

    • The interests of all stakeholders should be balanced.

Triple Bottom Line

  • The triple bottom line considers three aspects:

    • Prosperity/Profit

    • People

    • Planet

Why Involve in CSR?

  • Moral imperative

  • Reputation

  • Legitimacy (license-to-operate)

  • Customers (ethical/green consumerism, differentiation)

  • Advantages like lowering costs

  • Motivating and attracting employees (especially young employees)

  • Potential profit/revenue enhancement

CSR Strategy

  • CSR Strategy: Setting up a separate CSR strategy alongside the general strategy.

  • Strategic CSR: Incorporating CSR into the overall business strategy.

What is a CSR Strategy?

  • Goes beyond philanthropy and merely following the law.

  • Exceeds minimum legal requirements.

  • Examples include:

    • Code of conduct.

    • Ethical training.

    • Avoiding excessively high goals and bonuses.

  • Involves actions ensuring ethical company operations.

Responsive vs. Strategic CSR

  • Responsive CSR addresses generic social impacts through best practices or philanthropy

  • Strategic CSR involves:

    • Identifying areas where the company affects society.

    • Addressing those issues to achieve a social benefit and an economic/competitive benefit.

    • Aiming to lower costs and/or differentiate the company.

EU Strategy 2011-14 for CSR

  • Strategic approach to CSR:

    • Integrating social, environmental, ethical, human rights, and consumer concerns into business operations and core strategy.

    • Close collaboration with stakeholders.

The NEW Framework: Creating Shared Value (CSV)

  • Premise: Business and society are interdependent.

    • Successful corporations need a healthy society.

      • Educated and healthy employees lead to a productive workforce.

      • A healthy society boosts demand.

    • A healthy society needs successful companies.

      • Companies offer jobs.

      • Companies innovate.

      • Companies pay taxes.

Choosing CSR Initiatives

  • The essential test: Does the cause present an opportunity to create shared value (a meaningful benefit for society that is valuable to the business)?

  • Other social agendas are best left to companies in other industries, NGOs, or government institutions that are better positioned.

Intersect: Shared Value

  • Two simultaneous steps:

    • Identifying all issues where the corporation affects society to determine which ones to address.

    • Determining which issues offer a simultaneous economic/competitive benefit for the corporation.

Categorizing Social Issues

  • Social issues are categorized based on the relationship/intersection between the company and society:

    • Inside-out linkages: Impact of company's value chain activities on society (e.g., transport, production, waste, water). - Proactively address these ALWAYS

    • Outside-in linkages: Social dimensions of the competitive context (factors in the external environment that significantly affect the underlying drivers of competitiveness). - Actively look for opportunities.

    • No real intersection: Generic social issues (address only if you can).

Strategic Issues - Social Dimensions of Competitive Context

  • Factors in the external environment that significantly affect the underlying drivers of competitiveness where the company operates (outside-in linkages).

  • If the company helps with the issue, it benefits the company.

    • Lowering costs: e.g., healthy workforce, secure supply chains (e.g., Mars cacao farmers).

    • Differentiation: Adding a social dimension to the value proposition (e.g., Patagonia, Wholefoods).

  • ACTIVELY LOOK FOR OPPORTUNITIES.

Examples

  • Mars cacao:

    • Considerably lowering costs.

    • Differentiation.

  • Patagonia:

    • Eco-friendly apparel manufacturer.

    • Capilene material made of recycled polyester.

    • Recycling program for old clothes.

    • Support for a Land Trust in South America.

  • Wholefoods:

    • Distinguishes itself from competitors.

    • Buying from local farmers.

    • Green electricity.

    • Animal welfare.

    • Screening out unhealthy/environmentally damaging ingredients.

    • Composting spoiled products and biodegradable waste.

    • Leading to "premium" prices.

Categorization Varies

  • The categorization of a social issue (generic, value chain impact, or competitive context) varies from:

    • Business unit to business unit.

    • Industry to industry.

    • Place to place.

Examples of Categorization

  • Carbon emission:

    • Financial institution: Generic.

    • Cookies production company: Value chain social impact.

    • Car manufacturer: Value chain social impact & Competitive context.

  • AIDS:

    • Financial institution: Generic.

    • Pharmaceutical company: Competitive context.

    • Mine company in Africa: Competitive context.

Take Away

  • Sort social issues into generic issues, value chain impacts, and social dimensions of competitive context for YOUR company/BU.

    • Generic issues: only if you can.

    • Value chain impact: ALWAYS proactively (minimum).

    • Look at strategic CSR opportunities.

  • Some value chain impacts.

  • Always social dimensions of competitive context – choose wisely!

  • By helping, it helps my business.

  • Adding a social dimension to the value proposition.

Critiques

  • Nil novum sub sole est:

    • Similar to corporate sustainability and value creation for stakeholders.

    • Ignores existing literature (intellectual piracy).

  • Blind focus on individual corporate self-interest.

  • Naïve as it ignores tensions between social goals and economic goals.

    • Social and economic goals are not always aligned for all stakeholders (no win-win).

    • Social and economic goals are difficult to integrate.