Gene Editing Technologies, Ethics, and Applications
Gene Editing: Future Directions and Current Challenges
Addressing AAV Size Limitations for Cas9 Delivery
Problem: The gene encoding Cas9 is too large to fit into adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), which are commonly used for gene delivery.
Solutions:
- Engineering smaller Cas9 variants: Some researchers are working to create smaller versions of the Cas9 protein.
- Split Cas9 delivery: A more radical approach involves delivering the Cas9 protein in two halves that reassemble inside the cell. This is enabled by inteins which are protein introns.
Intein-Mediated Protein Splicing
Inteins are protein modules that can excise themselves from a precursor protein.
Mechanism:
- Inteins juxtapose specific amino acid side chains.
- This induces a chemical reaction that results in the intein being spliced out.
- The two flanking protein fragments are joined together via a thioester bond, forming a continuous protein.
- The formula for this process would be something like:
Application to Cas9:
- Cas9 is split into two halves.
- An intein is attached to the N-terminus of the first half and another to the C-terminus of the second half.
- The two halves are co-expressed and co-localized within the cell.
- The inteins remove themselves, leaving the ends of the Cas9 halves ready to join.
- The halves fuse to form a complete, functional Cas9 protein.
AAV-Mediated Delivery of Split Cas9
This approach utilizes two AAV vectors:
AAV Vector 1: Encodes the guide RNA and half of Cas9 (residues 2-573) with a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) and an N-terminal intein module.
AAV Vector 2: Encodes the guide RNA and the other half of Cas9 (residues 574-1368) with an NLS and a C-terminal intein module.
Both viruses transfect cells, and the Cas9 halves are expressed and localized to the nucleus.
The intein reaction occurs, causing the Cas9 halves to fuse and form a complete Cas9 protein, which then complexes with the guide RNA in order to create a functional gene editing system.
Experimentation: This system has been tested in pig and human models of muscular dystrophy.
Application to Muscular Dystrophy
Muscular Dystrophy Cause: Mutations in the dystrophin gene lead to an out-of-frame section, resulting in no functional dystrophin protein being produced and causing muscle wasting.
Solution: Instead of correcting the mutation, the approach involves excising an entire exon (e.g., exon 51).
This can be achieved through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) after making cuts on either side of the exon.
Outcome: The resulting messenger RNA will lack the exon, and the protein will be shorter; however, it will still be functional.
Experimental Results (2020):
- The split Cas9 system delivered via AAV vectors was used to excise exon 51.
- This resulted in a shortened but functional dystrophin protein.
- Improved muscle function, increased mobility, and prolonged lifespan were observed in the models.
Ethical Considerations of Germline Editing
Germline editing involves making modifications to a fertilized egg or early embryo, leading to changes in the resulting human being.
Ethical Concerns:
- Potential pressures to make unnecessary changes to create "improved" children.
- The need to restrict germline editing to cases where it is essential for the individual's health.
He Jiankui and the CRISPR Babies
He Jiankui, a researcher from China, famously created gene-edited babies (Lulu and Nana) to protect them against HIV.
Procedure:
- IVF was performed, and the CCR5 gene was modified using CRISPR-Cas9 in the embryos.
- The goal was to disable the CCR5 gene, thus preventing HIV from entering cells.
Ethical Issues:
- The procedure was performed without proper ethical approvals.
- It was deemed unnecessary for the children's health, as they did not have any intrinsic genetic problems.
Consequences for He Jiankui:
- He was censored, fired from his university, and sentenced to three years in jail.
Global Regulations on Germline Editing
- Gene editing of human embryos is banned in many countries, either through legislation or guidelines.
Summary of Gene Editing Technologies
Gene editing technologies have rapidly evolved, from zinc finger nucleases and TALENs to CRISPR-Cas systems.
These technologies have great potential for knocking out genes and making corrections to genes.
Ex vivo applications are working well and are being used in the clinic (in humans).
In vivo targeting is more challenging, but new approaches are promising.
Significant ethical and regulatory issues need to be addressed.
CRISPR-Cas9 Approach for Sickle Cell Anemia
Understanding Sickle Cell Anemia
Cause: A monogenic disorder caused by a single mutation in the beta-globin chain.
Mechanism: The mutation causes hemoglobin to polymerize within red blood cells, leading to a sickle shape.
Consequences:
- Reduced oxygen transport
- Clogging of arteries and veins
- Symptoms include hemolysis, anemia, and ischemia
Fetal Hemoglobin and Sickle Cell Anemia
Hemoglobin tetramer contains two alpha-globin and two beta-globin subunits.
Fetal hemoglobin contains two alpha-globin and two gamma-globin subunits.
Persistence of Fetal Hemoglobin: Some individuals with the sickle cell gene are asymptomatic due to the continued expression of fetal hemoglobin (gamma form), leading to a benign phenotype.
This persistence can be caused by large deletions in the beta-globin gene cluster or point mutations in the promoters of the gamma-globin gene.
People with the beta-globin mutation and persistent fetal hemoglobin production have reduced polymer formation and are protected against sickle cell anemia.
Gene Editing Strategy to Turn on Fetal Hemoglobin
Why not correct the beta-globin mutation directly?
- Mature red blood cells lack nuclei and DNA.
- Precursor erythroid cells (stem cells) lack the machinery for homologous recombination.
Insight: Gamma-globin gene expression is repressed by the transcription factor BCL11A.
Targeting BCL11A:
- Knocking out BCL11A would lead to increased gamma-globin expression and protection against sickle cell anemia.
- However, BCL11A is an important transcription factor with regulatory roles in neuron development and B cells.
Solution: Regulate BCL11A specifically in erythroid cells.
Delete the BCL11A erythroid enhancer using genome editing, leading to a lack of BCL11A expression only in erythroid cells.
Mechanism of Action
In sickle cell disease, BCL11A represses gamma-globin, and the beta-globin mutation leads to sickle cell anemia.
Targeting the erythroid-specific enhancer of BCL11A by non-homologous end joining represses BCL11A, leading to sufficient gamma-globin production and healthy red blood cells.
Clinical Trials: This approach is being used in clinical trials in 2019.
Clinical Trial Results (2021)
Patients with sickle cell anemia or beta-thalassemia were treated with CRISPR-Cas9 targeting the BCL11A erythroid-specific enhancer.
High percentage of alleles successfully modified.
No evidence of off-target effects.
After more than a year, patients had:
- High levels of successful edits
- Increased fetal hemoglobin
- Elimination of blockages due to the diseases
In Vivo Targeting
More difficult than ex vivo approaches because of the need to deliver large tracts of DNA to the targets.
AAV vectors often too small for this purpose.
CCR5 as an HIV Therapy
Individuals with a mutated CCR5 receptor are not susceptible to HIV infection.
CCR5 is a co-receptor required for HIV entry into cells.
Destroying or eliminating CCR5 can protect cells from HIV infection.
Zinc Finger Nuclease Approach
As early as 2008, researchers used zinc finger nucleases to target and disrupt the CCR5 gene in the cell.
Zinc finger nucleases create double-stranded breaks in the DNA, and non-homologous end joining results in insertions or deletions that disrupt the gene.
The diagram shows the design of the zinc finger nuclease: 4\ Zinc\Fingers + Fok1\ Nuclease\ Monomer + 4\ Zinc\Fingers . They were specific for the targeted site.
Gene-edited cells had a significantly lower viral load compared to control cells when challenged with HIV.
Human Trials with Zinc Finger Nucleases
In 2014, 12 HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral drugs had their T cells collected, cultured, and transfected with a zinc finger nuclease targeting CCR5.
The modified T cells were then transfused back into the patients.
All participants had elevated levels of T cells in their blood.
Six participants were able to stop their antiretrovirals, and HIV came back much more slowly than normal.
T cell levels remained high for weeks.
TALEN Gene Editing for Leukemia
Layla Richards, a young girl with leukemia, was treated with gene-edited CAR T cells after other therapies failed.
CAR T cells are T cells that have been given extra receptors to help them recognize cancer cells.
The researchers used a TALEN gene-edited approach to give the T cells the ability to not be recognized by the therapy against the CD52 receptor and also make sure that they would be matched inside the child.
The T cells were from a donor and were modified in culture using TALEN-mediated gene editing and then transfused into Layla.
This experimental treatment had amazing results and saved the little girl.
CRISPR-Cas9 System
Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna recognized that the guide RNA could be fused with the trace RNA to make a system that could be used for gene editing.
Feng Zhang also developed CRISPR-Cas9 systems for gene editing and pioneered methods for using them in cells.
Both groups have been in competition, and there have been difficulties in working out the patents.
Somatic Cell Editing vs. Germline Editing
Somatic cell editing involves corrections that are not heritable to the next generations, whereas Germline editing does.
Somatic cell editing is used to treat an individual for their current disease.
Ex Vivo vs. In Vivo Approaches
Ex Vivo: Cells that need correcting can be removed from the body, cultured, corrected, and transplanted back into the original patient.
In Vivo: Systemic delivery of the components of the nuclease gene editing machinery into the bloodstream. Ideally with a targeted delivery into the particular organ of the cell of the body that's desired.
Considerations for Gene Editing
The gene editing is very limited in how long it persists in the body, if cell involved is short lived.
Homology directed repair only takes place in a cell that's undergoing cell cycle, conversely, non dividing cells can only use non homologous end joining.
The change must confer an advantage to the fitness of the cell, than the gene editing can really work well.
Nuclease Approaches in Human Therapeutics
- Zinc finger nucleases, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas9 have all been used in efforts to develop human therapeutics.
Factors to Consider
Recognition site lengths
Targeting constraints
Ease of engineering
Potential immunogenicity
Ease of delivery