Sentencing
The Actors in the Sentencing Process
Prosecutors
Appointed or elected official
Responsible for bringing the state’s case against the accused
Obligation to seek justice and convict those who are guilty
Key player in plea bargaining
Judge
Senior officer in a criminal court
Many are elected
Duties are extensive and vary—must uphold the Constitution
Rule on conduct
Settle questions made in motions regarding evidence, procedure, etc.
Decide guilt in bench trials
Sentencing
Probation Staff
Conduct presentence investigation (PSI)
Interview the involved parties
Collection of documents related to the case and/or defendant
Suggest sentence per the law according to the circumstances of the crome
Pretrial Release Officer
Recommends defendants for pretrial release
Bail and Pretrial Release
Bail
Temporary conditional release of an accused person awaiting trial
Are not permitted to leave the jurisdiction
Refrain from contacting the victim
Commit no crimes
Meant to ensure that the accused person will return for trial
Pretrial Release
Released on own Recognizance (RoR)
Unsecured
Percentage
Third-party
Signature bond
Supervised release
Bail
Bail Reform
Manhattan Bail Project—the Vera institute of Justice, New York
Provided RoR release for eligible offenders
Bail Reform Act of 1966
Urged pretrial release for all noncapital cases unless defendant was a flight risk
Bail Reform Act of 1984
The federal statute that still governs pretrial release and detention in the United States
Replaced the 1966 Act and dramatically expanded judicial authority to detain defendants before trial
Formalized preventative detention provisions for appropriate candidates
Shift from “flight risk only” to “dangerousness”
United States v. Salerno (1987)—upheld preventative detention
2025: Bail Reform: Safety vs. Equity
Current Federal Policy
Core belief: Cash bail ensures accountability and deters crime
Policy action: Executive orders penalizing cashless jurisdictions; push to reinstate bail in D.C
Symbolic framing: “No cash, no consequences”—reform equated with chaos
Evidence cited: Yolo County study showing 163% crime increase under zero-bail
Justice philosophy: Retributive—visible consequences maintain order
Reform Advocates
Core belief: Cash bail punishes poverty and undermines fairness
Policy action: Support for risk-based release and community supports
Symbolic framing: “Freedom before trial”—dignity and equity emphasized
Evidence cited: Mixed data; some studies show no rise in crime, others highlight systemic bias
Justice philosophy: Restorative—justice should be equitable and healing
Imposing Sentence
Concurrent vs. Consecutive
Concurrent: one or more sentences imposed at the same time and served simultaneously
Consecutive: one or more sentences imposed at the same time and served one after the other
The Effect of Good Time
Deduction of time awarded to incarcerated people for good behavior
Determinate Sentencing
Offender is sentenced to a definite term
Flat-time
Mandatory
Presumptive
25 states have implemented determinate sentencing reform (as of 2025)
Structured Sentences
Regulate sentence length and judicial discretion
The first four states to implement presumptive sentencing guidelines were Minnesota, Washington, Pennsylvania, and Florida
Presumptive Sentencing
Process in which the legislature sets the penalties for criminal acts
About twenty states and the federal government utilize sentencing guidelines
Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Result of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act (1984) and Sentencing Reform Act (1984)
Adopted by Congress and are binding on federal judges until the U.S Supreme Court rules on otherwise
Abolished federal parole
Created United States Sentencing Commission
Judges had to justify deviations from sentencing guidelines
Sentencing Reform Act of 1984
Evaluations of Sentencing Guidelines
Concerns include complexity, bias, and harshness towards offenders
Legality of Sentencing Guidelines
Supervised Release (Instead of Parole)
Supervised release is a period of community supervision that begins after a person completes their full federal prison sentence
It is not parole, and it does not shorten the prison term
Supervised release was created by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 to replace federal parole when parole was abolished
It is mandatory for many federal offenses
Especially:
Drug offenses
Firearms offenses
Sex offenses
Many violent offenses
Federal Sentencing Guidelines (continued)
Mandatory minimum sentences
Purpose is to specify a certain required number of years of incarceration for specific crimes
Prominent forms:
Legislature may prohibit defendants convicted of certain offenses from being placed on probation
Legislature may require certain offenses carry a mandatory term of imprisonment
Three-Strikes Laws
Require harsher sentences without parole for those convicted of a third or high-order felony
Truth-in-Sentencing
Laws that require offenders to serve a substantial portion of their imposed sentence and reduces discrepancies in the actual time served in prison
Federal incentive grants require 85% of the sentence to be served
How People are Sentenced
A recent study of national practices revealed:
75% of those convicted of a felony are sentenced to incarceration in state prison or jail, compared to 56% of those convicted of a misdemeanor
1 in 4 felony convictions and 1 in 3 misdemeanor convictions resulted in probation
Murder convictions resulted in the longest median sentence (360 months); the next longest medians were for rape (120 months) and robbery (60 months)
What Happens After the Sentence is Served?
6 in 10 (62%) released prisoners were arrested for a new offense within three years; 7 in 10 (71%) within five years post-release
46% of those released in 2012 returned within 5 years for either a probation violation, parole violation, or new sentence
Recidivism rate are lower for older individuals
Males (72%) were more likely than females (63%) to be rearrested
Value Systems of Society
Excessive Length of Sentences
American sentencing practices tied to social, cultural, and political factors of our history
American sentences of incarceration are much longer than those found in our industrialized nations
Only advanced nation to incarcerate people for minor property crimes
How People are Sentenced (continued)
Legal Factors Affecting Sentencing
Severity of offense
Offender’s prior record
Offender’s use of a weapon
Offender’s use of violence
Crime committed for money
Nonlegal Factors Affecting Sentencing
Contextual factors
Social class
Gender
Age
Victim Characteristics
Racial Disparities of Sentencing
Black offenders routinely receive harsher sentences than White offenders—even when controlled for criminal history and the seriousness of offenses
Conditions that could produce sentencing disparity may occur before the trial takes place
This would mean system disparity rather than judicial bias in sentencing outcomes