Notes on Research in the Behavioral Sciences (Transcript)
Limits on Human Intuition
- Several factors make it difficult for people to test theories about the world in an accurate manner.
- The Overconfidence Effect
- The Confirmation Bias
- The Hindsight Bias
- How much there actually is to know
- How much you think there is to know
- How much you know
The scientific attitude
- How does the science of psychology correct for the limitations of human intuition?
- 1) Applies amiable skepticism
- When presented with information as fact:
- Clarify terms (including success/failure of an idea)
- How do you know that?
- How good is the evidence?
- Is there any evidence to the contrary?
- What is the weight of the evidence?
- Requires humility
- Accept ideas supported by evidence
- Remain skeptical of, but don’t completely discount, those lacking evidence
- 2) Applies the scientific method
The scientific method
- Start with a theory – General statement about how variables are related to one another
- Develop a study and state your hypothesis – Derived from theory, more specific and testable
- An a priori prediction of what will happen in the study
- Analyze your data – Use statistics to evaluate your hypothesis
- Report the results – Peer review process
- Start all over again… A à B Except in cases of C, D, E, F, G H, I…
Using the Scientific Method in Psychology
- We need to identify the study design(s) that best address our question(s)
- Correlational research: observe & measure variables as they naturally happen
- Cross-sectional – at one time point
- Longitudinal – at multiple time points
- Experimental research: Manipulate one variable and measure its effect on another
- Why does design matter?
Cross-sectional research
- Measure 2+ variables at one point in time in a large sample of participants
- Variable B
- Variable A
- Represented by a correlation coefficient
Correlation Coefficients (r)
- Describes relationship between two measured variables
- Range: r∈[−1,1]
- Positive correlations: 0 < r \le +1
- Example: GPA and Attendance
- Inverse (negative) correlations: -1 \le r < 0
- Example: GPA and alcohol consumption
- No correlation: r=0
- Example: GPA and hair length
- Interpretation scale (typical):
- -1.0: Perfect negative
- -0.8: Strong negative
- -0.5: Moderate negative
- -0.2: Weak negative
- 0.0: No correlation
- +0.2: Weak positive
- +0.5: Moderate positive
- +0.8: Strong positive
- +1.0: Perfect positive
If you remember nothing else about correlational research, remember this
- Correlation does not equal Causation
Let’s look into that further
- Three ways to interpret a correlation:
- A → B: Playing violent video games increases aggression
- B → A: Aggressive people tend to like violent games more
- C → A & B: A spurious third variable causes both
- 3rd variable problem
- Before we move along…
- Correlations are not bad science, they’re just limited
- Sometimes the only way to (ethically) study a topic
- Directionality problem
3 Requirements of Causality
- Causation requires:
- Covariation (the variables vary together in a systematic way)
- Temporal Precedence (the cause precedes the effect in time)
- Elimination of Spuriousness (Ruling out alternative explanations)
- Experiments
- Longitudinal designs
- Cross-Sectional designs
- Longitudinal Experiments
SSS (Slide content illustrating an experimental design)
- Independent Variable (IV)
- Random Assignment
- Dependent Variable (DV)
- (Notes on the slide content in the transcript show some garbled text, but the core takeaway is the presence of an IV, random assignment, and a DV in an experimental layout.)
Sample vs Population
- Goal: Describe a population
- All cases in the group of interest
- Population: The typical college student
- Can we study all college students? Why not?
- Sample: subset of that population that we use to represent the population
- Random sampling: Each individual in the population has an equal chance of taking part in the study
- Almost impossible with large populations
- Convenience sampling: Sample of individuals easily available for study
- Low likelihood of representativeness
- Example: Study of drinking behavior of college students conducted at a religious university
- Ways to correct for sampling bias
- Restrict population
- Sample in large numbers
- Stratified sampling: Specifically recruit to find a representative sample of the population
- Example recruitment composition: 59% non-Hispanic Caucasian, 19% Hispanic, 12.6% Black, 5% Asian, 1% Native American