Power
Omelas: A Perfect, Joyous City
Festivals, families, children playing, horses prancing
Bright, sunny, filled with happiness (“prize of the world”)
Hidden Disturbing Secret
In a basement under the town hall lives a neglected child
Possibly born feebleminded or became that way
Afraid, isolated, no sense of time or society
Once screamed and cried, now only whines quietly
Citizens’ Awareness
Everyone knows the child is there
They accept it must remain, since all happiness depends on its misery
Parents sometimes show their children the suffering child at the same age → children often feel disgusted
Some visitors cannot accept it → they quietly leave the city and never return
They choose the unknown over living with the secret
The Point of the Story
Raises the question of tolerance: what injustices would you accept?
Clear when young, murkier when older
Connects to oppression, discrimination, prejudice
Personalizes it: what if a loved one was in the cell?
Democracy = long-term thinking to prevent rebellion
Oppression leads to violence if people aren’t given space/accommodation
Societies must accommodate diversity
People respond differently: some can’t handle injustice, others accept it
Good intentions can still go wrong
A “perfect world” depends on someone suffering in the cellar
Questions whether those in the cellar truly belong there
Higher Power & Politics
There is a higher power affecting us — politics is trying to figure out how that power impacts us
Must understand the cycle of higher vs. lower power
The Fields of Political Science
International Relations → between countries
Comparative Politics → institutions and processes within states
Political Theory/Philosophy → values & ideals
Example: Universities (U.S. vs. Canada approaches)
Political Economy → economic systems
Example: U.S. Dollar as global standard
Alternative systems: Europe, Russia, etc.
Theories
Modernization Theory → if countries modernize like “higher-level” states, they’ll succeed
Dependency Theory → counters modernization; global debt & interest perpetuate inequality
Inside vs. Outside the Cellar
Worldview differs for those excluded (in the cellar) vs. those privileged (outside)
Exclusion creates different sentiments
Dependency → left out on purpose
Modernization → “catch up and you’ll succeed”
Defining Politics: Conflict or Cooperation?
Andrew Heywood
Politics = making, preserving, and amending rules for living together
Example: writing to city council to request speed bumps
Rival opinions don’t always mean conflict → reconcile through collaboration
Be active in your community, change rules if needed
Harvey Mansfield
Politics = taking sides; it’s partisan
Must choose who represents your ideas best
Hands Morgan Thou
Politics = “Annamist dominani” (animals dominate)
Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels
Politics = organized power of one class oppressing another
Viewed through prism of groups (class struggle)
Harold Lasswell (1936)
Politics = “Who gets what, when, how”
Political community defined by authoritative allocation of values
Imposing not just rules but beliefs
Note: All definitions are valid, just different perspectives that overlap.
Multiple Choice
Who attributes Annamist dominani to politics, and can you quote anyone?
Sometimes questions won’t be in the books or in the slides.
Politics begins in any interaction between two or more people. Any discussion between two or more people is the beginning of politics because it essentially includes everything we talked about before, but involves when there are two or more people whose opinions or coincidences may coincide or clash. So, human interaction is the beginning of politics. Everything we say follows from it.
If human interaction is the beginning, then when humans come together, it’s them against all others, which leads to the formation of groups. From there, classes (such as economic ones) can form, and essentially the question becomes: how do we divide the pie? All of this is still relevant, but it’s important to deconstruct things to their root — and that root is human interaction.
Greek Thought in Politics
Politics = polis = city-state (Athens, Sparta)
Shared values, vision, and structure
Root of the word “politics” comes from Ancient Greek
Aristotle
Man is by nature a political animal
Only within a political community can humans live the good life
Politics is an ethical activity aimed at justice
Politics = the “master science” — noble to pursue, but not for everyone
Al-Farabi
Politics should create perfect human beings
Aim: reduce violence and instability
Society should nurture virtuous individuals → just society
Plato
Ruin comes when traders (greedy) or generals (military rule) dominate politics
Producers → best in economy, worst in politics
Warriors → best in battle, worst in politics
Politics can’t just be about money → everyone must “stay in their lane”
True politics = statesmanship (art of governing with preparation)
Example: You call the best-trained doctor, not the prettiest one → same applies in politics
Confucius (Kong Qui)
Ruler must prioritize virtue → then people → then territory → then wealth
Virtue = root, wealth = branches
If wealth is the priority, ruler fails and teaches dishonesty
Purely economic politics = failed politics
Collective Psychology Insight
All perspectives are valid and overlap in understanding politics
Essay
Plato passsage will be given and asked to descrbibe it to the Professor and what they’re saying
Politics as the Art of Government
State-centered view: politics is only about government institutions.
Criticism: too narrow — ignores how individuals, businesses, schools, and civil society shape political outcomes.
Must consider hidden influences (“the hidden hands”) outside formal government.
🔹 Politics as Public Affairs
Looks at “public life” (schools, buses, universities).
Criticism: ignores how private life affects public life.
Example: Troubled youth from broken homes → higher likelihood of crime.
If root causes are ignored, policies only address symptoms, not problems.
Politics must go beyond public institutions to address deeper social factors.
🔹 Three Types of Political Analysis
Normative → asks value-based questions.
“What is the good life?”
“Should we value freedom, privacy, equality?”
Not resolvable by facts → requires consensus, debate, and discussion.
Freedom is central: without it, society risks fear, conformity, and lack of creativity (e.g., 1984).
Empirical → focuses on observable phenomena.
Describes what IS, not what ought to be.
Example: surveying 400 bus drivers in Edmonton on safety.
Rooted in behavioralism → watching behavior to explain politics.
Problem: risks missing cultural meaning without “thick description.”
Clifford Geertz: actions (like a wink) can mean different things in different cultures.
Semantic → concerned with meaning and language.
How political terms are defined and framed.
Words shape perception (e.g., labels given to issues or groups).
Must analyze context and underlying meaning, not just surface descriptions.
⚠ Note: These three approaches are interconnected, not mutually exclusive.
🔹 Normative Analysis — Deeper Focus
Early political science centered on value questions:
What should we want?
How should we live together?
Should freedom of expression be limited?
Argument: freedom allows creativity, innovation, and progress.
Suppressing freedom leads to fear, conformity, and stagnation.
“I have not failed, I’ve found 1,000 ways that don’t work.” — Edison
Problem: political parties push different normative judgments (narratives) that may conflict.
Important: judge actions, not just words.
🔹 Empirical Analysis — Deeper Focus
Goal: identify observable evidence.
Example: surveys, statistics, experiments.
Issue: methodology and interpretation affect validity.
“Thick description” is needed: political behavior must be understood in its cultural context.
✅ Summary Takeaways
Politics is not just about the state — it includes society, culture, and private life.
Political analysis requires multiple lenses:
Normative (values),
Empirical (facts/observations),
Semantic (meanings/definitions).
All three overlap and provide a fuller understanding of politics.