Unspeakable Conversations: Study Notes on Disability Ethics and Personhood
Unspeakable Conversations By Harriet McBryde Johnson
Overview
- Author: Harriet McBryde Johnson
- Published Date: February 16, 2003
- Context: The narrative discusses thoughts and interactions between Harriet Johnson and renowned philosopher Peter Singer regarding disability and the ethics surrounding lives of individuals with disabilities.
Main Ideas
Opening Reflection
- Johnson recounts her experience with Peter Singer.
- Singer's belief:
- He prefers to give parents the option of selective infanticide to avoid suffering associated with disabilities.
- He argues that certain infants do not meet the criteria for personhood due to a lack of self-awareness.
- Johnson expresses confusion and distress regarding Singer's arguments, describing the mental strain as almost enjoyable.
Defining Personhood
- **Singer's Definition of Personhood: **
- Awareness of existence in time.
- Capacity to hold preferences about the future, including a desire to continue living.
- Johnson's perspective:
- She was considered to lack personhood as an infant and will eventually lose it again if cognitive decline occurs.
- Singer's stance:
- Allows for the termination of individuals deemed non-persons at any point in life.
Engagement with Disability Rights
- Johnson's motivations for participating in discussions with Singer:
- To advocate for disability rights and challenge Singer's views on selective infanticide.
- Personal interest in the story and its implications.
- Public Speaking Engagements:
- Morning: Discussion with undergraduates on selective infanticide.
- Evening: Dinner discussion on assisted suicide.
Encounter with Peter Singer
Initial Connect and Responses
- Johnson's experience meeting Singer is marked by her own physical appearance and reaction:
- She recounts the physical impact of her disability and the public's reaction, which varies from admiration to pity.
- Singer's Reaction:
- Shows no discomfort, engaging Johnson as a professional.
Discussion Overview
- In a lecture, Singer discusses:
- The inconsistency of allowing abortion but opposing infanticide.
- The utilitarian approach to ethics, emphasizing maximizing preferences for well-being.
- Johnson challenges Singer's arguments directly:
- Criticizes his jurisprudential views and the assumptions underlying them.
- Argues against the replacement-baby theory of maximizing happiness, stating that humans are not interchangeable.
Johnson's Personal Experience
Physical Description and Life Experience
- Johnson describes her disability:
- Muscle-wasting disease leading to skeletal transformations.
- Reflects on the societal perceptions of disability and her own journey toward self-acceptance and comfort in her body.
Public Perception and Interaction
- Johnson notes common societal reactions:
- Mixed responses of admiration and pity when encountering her.
- Frustration with the misunderstandings and stereotypes related to disability.
Concept of Identity and Value
Singer's Position on Disability vs. Ability
- Singer argues that disability inherently makes individuals 'worse off.'
- Johnson counters this by discussing individual experiences:
- Claims that those with disabilities can lead fulfilling and meaningful lives.
Hypothetical Situations for Comparison
- Johnson leads a hypothetical scenario regarding race, inquiring why race-based preferences are deemed unreasonable and ability-based preferences are not.
- Dissects disparities in societal treatment based on disability.
Dialogues and Further Engagement
Email Correspondences
- Follow extensive discussions through emails after the initial meetings:
- Johnson engages with Singer on selective infanticide and societal biases regarding disabilities.
- Recognizes a two-way curiosity in their discussions.
Discussion on Assisted Suicide
- Johnson attends discussions about assisted suicide, exploring autonomy versus societal views on the quality of life for disabled people.
- Critiques the implications of suggesting that disability is a reason for assisted suicide.
Conclusions and Ongoing Reflections
Philosophical Reflections on Disability
- Johnson grapples with Singer's framework regarding what defines a 'good life' and challenges the idea that a life with disabilities is less valuable.
- Final thoughts include:
- A hope that society will not accept a view that devalues disabled lives.
- Recognition of interconnectedness in society, which complicates the moral and ethical considerations raised by Singer.
Continuing Conversations and Community Responses
- Johnson acknowledges feedback from her community regarding her engagement with Singer, illustrating the tension within disability rights.
- Explores the complexities of what it means to advocate for disabled lives amid prevailing prejudices.