functionalism - notes
Durkheim
Crime is found in all societies because:
individuals are exposed to different influences & circumstances, so not everyone is equally & effectively socialised into the shared norms of society
diversity of lifestyles may be deemed deviant or criminal
Crime is inevitable & necessary:
~ Boundary maintenance - when a crime occurs society unites to condemn the act, this reaction clarifies the boundaries of acceptable behaviour & shows what will and will not be tolerated which strengthens social solidarity & reinforces the collective consensus
e.g. London Riots 2011 - courts implemented harsh sentences, even for minor offences, to reinforce social boundaries & act as a deterrent
~ Adaption & change - crime & deviance can expose injustice, inequality, or outdated practices, promoting social change by encouraging new ways of thinking - silencing those who challenge norms risks preventing social development
e.g. Martin Luther King Jr, Rosa Parks, Nelson Mandela were arrested for challenging racist laws & inequalities and brought about important social change
~ Safety valve - provides an outlet for frustration & discontentment that might otherwise build up & cause more serious unrest
e.g. protests & riots can be seen as expressions of dissatisfaction with inequality, injustice, or state power - London Riots 2011
~ Warning device - high levels of deviance suggest that social institutions are failing to regulate behaviour or support individuals effectively
e.g. increased gang violence & drug use in some UK urban areas during the 1990’s were seen as signs of failures in institutions such as the family & education system
Evaluation
~ Highlights that crime can serve positive functions in society
~ Highlights that through social engineering, crime rates can be reduced by strengthening social cohesion & reintegrating marginalised groups into mainstream society
~ Doesn’t specify how much crime is the right amount for society to function properly - makes it difficult to apply his theory
~ Focuses on the functions of crime but overlooks how crime might disproportionately affect certain groups or individuals
~ Crime does not always promote social solidarity, it can lead to greater social division
Merton
Strain theory
Crime & deviance occurs due to the strain between:
The goals society encourages people to achieve
The limited opportunities available to achieve those goals legitimately
The American Dream (shared goal) - the belief that anyone can achieve success & happiness through hard work
Americans are expected to reach this dream through legitimate means (education), however, disadvantaged groups (poverty, racism) often lack access to these opportunities - creating strain
Since this success is so highly valued, people may prioritise winning over following the rules, making crime & deviance the only way to succeed
Responses to strain:
~ Conformity - accept societal goals & legitimate means of achieving them, continuing to strive for success through socially approved methods - a student working hard to achieve good grades
~ Innovation - accept societal goals but reject or find new means to achieve them (often illegitimate) - theft, fraud
~ Ritualism - reject societal goals but rigidly adhere to socially approved means, even though the effort won’t achieve success - worker who goes to work everyday without ambition to advance
~ Retreatism - reject both societal goals & means, often withdrawing from society entirely - drug addicts, vagrancy
~ Rebellion - reject existing societal goals & means, they replace them with new ones to create a different system or set of values - a revolutionary seeking to overthrow the government
Evaluation
~ Explains the patterns shown in official crime stats:
. Most crime is property crime because American society values material wealth so highly
. Lower-class crime rates are higher because they have the least opportunities to obtain wealth legitimately
~ Official stats over-represent working class crime
~ Ignores the power of the ruling class to make & enforce the law against the poor
~ Assumes there is a value consensus - not everyone wants to make money/be successful
Cohen
Found: working-class boys face anomie/cultural deprivation in the middle-class dominated school system. As a result of being unable to achieve status by legitimate means, the boys suffered status frustrations
Resolved this frustration by rejecting mainstream middle-class values & forming their own ‘delinquent subculture’ to gain status & respect
Evaluation
~ Helps explain crimes that are not purely driven by economic motives but status, such as violence
~ Assumes working-class boys start off with the same middle-class success goals, many may not have ever viewed themselves as failures because they don’t share these values
Cloward & Ohlin
individuals join different types of subcultures based on the types of opportunities available in their community:
Criminal subcultures - form in areas where there is an established network of organised crime. Provide opportunities for individuals to achieve success, mostly financial gain, through illegal means (theft, drug dealing)
Conflict subculture - emerge in communities with social disorganisation & limited opportunities (violence, poor education). Individuals in these areas may not have access to criminal networks, so they turn to violence to assert dominance & gain status & respect
Retreatist subculture - form in response to failure in both legitimate & illegitimate opportunity structures because of this, Individuals are rejected by criminal groups & mainstream society. As a result they turn to drugs, alcohol, as a way to escape & cope with their failure & frustration
Evaluation
~ Helped shape US government policies on crime
~ Over-predict working-class crime & ignore the crimes of the powerful & rich
~ Draw boundaries too sharply - the drug trade is a mixture of both criminal & conflict subcultures
~ Assumes that everyone has shared goals & that a value consensus exists