Comprehensive notes on Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS) and Feline Injection Site Sarcomas (ISS) - key concepts, data, and clinical implications
Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS) – General Considerations
STS are a diverse group of tumors accounting for 15% of cutaneous and subcutaneous (SQ) tumors in dogs and 7% in cats, representing ~1% of all malignancies.
Over 20 histologic subtypes exist, but STS are treated as a collective group due to similar biologic behavior and histologic features.
Biologic behavior: local invasiveness with a low-to-moderate risk of metastatic spread (grade dependent).
Demographics: most STS are solitary lesions occurring in middle-aged to older dogs and cats.
Breed/sex predilection: no specific predilection, though large-breed dogs may be overrepresented; rhabdomyosarcoma variants tend to occur in younger animals.
General prognosis is driven more by local control than by distant metastasis.
STS – Presenting Complaint & Signalment
Classic presentation: a slow-growing, non-painful dermal or hypodermal mass.
Clinical signs depend on location and tumor invasiveness:- Nerve root or peripheral nerve sheath tumor can cause pain, lameness, muscle atrophy, paralysis.
Abdominal sarcomas can cause GI signs, weight loss, vomiting, etc.
STS Variants (Major Origins)
Tumors of fibrous origin: Fibrosarcoma (FSA)
Tumors of adipose tissue: Lipoma, intermuscular lipomas, infiltrative lipoma, liposarcoma
Tumors of skeletal muscle: Rhabdomyosarcoma
Tumors of vascular/lymphatics: Lymphangiosarcoma, Hemangioma, Hemangiosarcoma (HSA)
Tumors of peripheral nerves: Hemangiopericytomas, peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNST)
Tumors of synovial tissue: Synovial cell sarcoma
Tumors of smooth muscle: Leiomyoma, Leiomyosarcoma
Tumors of uncertain origin: Myxosarcoma
Tumors of Fibrous Origin
Nodular Fasciitis (Fibromatosis, “Desmoid tumor”)- Benign; rare; arises from fascia in dogs
Features: nodular, poorly circumscribed, firm, invasive; can be misdiagnosed as FSA; require aggressive resection for cure
Fibrosarcoma (FSA)- Malignant fibroblasts; common in skin, SQ, and mouth
Predilection: older dogs and cats; no strong sex/breed predilection (e.g., Golden Retrievers, Dachshunds mentioned as possible associations)
Behavior: infiltrative masses with relatively low metastasis rate (~20%)
Important pitfall: high–low variations in oral lesions; treat with careful resection
Tumors of Adipose Tissue
Lipoma- Benign adipose tumor; very common in older dogs; can occur anywhere
Indication for excision: when problematic
Intermuscular Lipoma- Arises from fat between muscles; common caudal thigh region (between semimembranosus and semitendinosus)
May feel infiltrative but is not; avoid overcalling as liposarcoma
Infiltrative Lipoma- Well-differentiated adipose tissue but locally aggressive by invading muscle, fascia, nerve, and even bone
Requires aggressive surgical excision; preop CT recommended
Liposarcoma- Does not arise from malignant transformation of lipomas
Features: firm, poorly circumscribed, locally invasive with usually low metastatic rate
Recommended management: wide excision; reported MST (median survival time) ~1188 days
Tumors of Skeletal Muscle – Rhabdomyosarcoma
Malignant tumors from myoblasts/primitive mesenchymal tissue with potential to differentiate into striated muscle
Common sites: tongue, larynx, myocardium; Botryoid rhabdomyosarcoma described as grape-like clusters in the bladder of young, large-breed dogs
Metastasis: low-to-moderate rate; data limited but overall considered rare
Tumors of Vascular & Lymphatic Tissue
Lymphangiosarcoma- Origin: lymphatic endothelial tissue
Presentation: soft, cyst-like, ill-defined SQ masses; often extensive with massive edema; lymph may translocate through skin
FNA may yield deceptively normal-looking fluid
Behavior: very aggressive; margins difficult to define
Treatment: reported success with radiation therapy, doxorubicin, and toceranib
Hemangioma- Benign vascular endothelial tumor; often solar-induced in short-haired/low-pigmented skin
May be a precursor to HSA
Treatment: surgical excision can be curative but lesions may be multifocal; cryotherapy effective if caught early
Cryotherapy for Hemangioma- Best for small/superficial lesions < 1 cm
Protocol: apply until tissue blanched white; perform 3 freeze-thaw cycles; treat tumor margins with surrounding normal tissue
Tumors of Hemangiosarcoma (HSA)
Staging by depth of involvement:- I: skin
II: subcutaneous (SQ)
III: muscle (acts like splenic HSA)
Treatment: wide surgical excision with adjunctive doxorubicin for stage II/III
Feline notes: usually solitary in the dermis; aggressive surgical treatment can yield MST ~1460 days vs ~60 days with no treatment
Tumors of Peripheral Nerves (PNSTs)
Malignant tumors of nerve sheath: include hemangiopericytoma, neurofibrosarcoma, malignant schwannoma
Location: occur in small peripheral nerves or in large nerves near the spinal cord (plexus or nerve roots)
Behavior: slow-growing but infiltrative; can become large; often mistaken for lipomas
Treatment and prognosis: aggressive resection; prognosis generally good unless origin is plexus/nerve root
Tumors of Synovial Tissue – Synovial Cell Sarcoma
Origin: malignant tumors from synoviocytes of the joint capsule and tendon sheath
Metastasis: higher metastatic rate compared with other sarcomas; ~32% at diagnosis and ~54% by euthanasia, with lungs and regional lymph nodes as common sites
Breed and joint preference: larger breeds (Flat-Coated Retriever, Golden Retriever); tends to involve larger joints (stifle, elbow, shoulder)
Distinction from osteosarcoma (OSA): can cross joints; bone involvement is rare in cats
Treatment: limb amputation considered the best option; MST ~850 days vs ~455 days with marginal excision
Tumors of Smooth Muscle
Origin: smooth muscle; common sites include GI tract, spleen, genitourinary tract (vagina), liver, and vessel walls
Paraneoplastic syndrome: hypoglycemia (more common with GI variants)
Leiomyoma- Benign, small, well-encapsulated; hormone-dependent (often in vagina); treatment: marginal excision with concurrent ovariohysterectomy (OHE)
Leiomyosarcoma- Malignant; moderate metastatic potential; second most common GI tumor; may involve the liver with very high metastasis rate (approaching 100% when liver is involved)
Tumors of Uncertain Origin – Myxosarcoma
Derived from fibroblasts; characterized by an abundant myxoid matrix rich in mucopolysaccharides
Clinically resembles a salivary mucocoele
Demographics: rare in middle-aged to older dogs
Location: most commonly subcutaneous on trunk or limbs
Behavior: tends to be infiltrative with ill-defined margins
STS – Important Common Features
Pseudo-encapsulated soft-to-firm masses with poorly defined margins; highly infiltrative into surrounding tissues
Local recurrence after conservative excision is common; exceptions possible
Metastasis: hematogenous spread generally < 20%; regional LN metastasis uncommon
Synovial cell sarcoma has a higher metastasis rate than other sarcomas
Grade predicts metastasis; resection margins predict local recurrence
The "1, 2, 3 → 10, 20, 30" rule links tumor size/grade to outcomes: larger/poorly marginated tumors have worse prognosis
Measurable/bulky tumors (> 5 cm) tend to be less responsive to chemotherapy or radiotherapy
STS – Work-up & Staging
Local tumor assessment:- Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to rule out lipoma, seroma, inflammation, or abscess
If sarcoma is confirmed, consider tumor grade for therapeutic strategy (location, size, invasiveness, owner goals, and patient comorbidities)
Incisional biopsy: Tru-cut or wedge preferred; punch biopsy not typically used if grade information is needed or FNA is equivocal
Thoracic radiographs for pulmonary metastasis in ALL cases; ideally for all
Regional imaging (radiographs, ultrasound, CT, MRI) if the mass is fixed to underlying structures
Abdominal ultrasound for presurgical staging is generally not indicated for most STS
CT may be used for surgical margin planning and thorough staging
STS – Surgical Considerations
Wide excision: at least 3 cm radial margin and at least 1 fascial plane, or 2 muscle planes deep; remove biopsy tracts and areas of fixation en bloc
Radical surgery (amputation or pelvic exenteration) may be required in some cases
The first surgery offers the best opportunity for local control and potential cure; incomplete resection increases morbidity, costs, recurrence risk, and reduces survival
Thorough planning and execution are essential; anticipate need for adjunctive therapies in some cases
STS – Exceptions to the “Rules”
In cases where wide excision cannot be guaranteed, management requires case-by-case decision-making that weighs patient function, owner wishes, and realistic outcomes
STS – Difficult Locations and Historical Data on Marginal Excision
Historically, marginal excisions have high recurrence rates (range: 26% - 60%)
Contemporary data (Vet Surg, 2008): Extremity STS treated via marginal excision show about a 10% recurrence rate (all Grade I tumors included)
Case selection is critical; about 43-51% of cases present on the extremity
STS Marginal Excision – Case Example (Summary)
Example: 13-year-old Shepherd mix with a year-long left antebrachial mass, 4 x 4 cm, movable
Co-morbidities: severe OA/DJD, hypothyroidism, renal insufficiency
Therapeutic options discussed: wide vs. radical excision (amputation) or en bloc excision with staged reconstruction; marginal excision with primary closure
Owner decisions vary based on functional impact and quality of life
STS Marginal Excision – Data Summary
Margins achieved by marginal excision:- Dirty margins: ≈ 34%
Clean but close (1–3 mm): ≈ 34%
Clean margins (>3 mm): ≈ 31%
Local recurrence rate after marginal excision: ≈ 10.5%; time to recurrence observed at multiple intervals (≈ 210, 450, 595, 700 days)
Practical takeaway: distal extremity, low-grade STS may be reasonable to excise marginally
Difficult Location – Difficult Decisions (Practical & Ethical Considerations)
Local tumor control must balance patient function and owner expectations
Preserving anatomic function often takes precedence over aggressive local control when margins are uncertain
Adjunctive Radiation Therapy (RT) – Role and Evidence
RT is an effective modality with consistently long overall survival in many cases: reported MST > 1,851 days
Effect on local tumor control has been variable; local recurrence rates after RT range from 17% - 31%
Given margins, it is not always reasonable to prescribe RT for all incompletely excised STS; outcomes may be improved with alternative strategies
Aggressive scar revision or re-excision to achieve clean margins can yield favorable results:- After re-excision, clean margins achieved in ≈ 90% (37/41)
Local recurrence ~15% (6/39) at median ≈ 142 days, often better than RT without excision
Metronomic Chemotherapy for STS
Study: 85 dogs with incompletely excised STS; 30 treated with metronomic cyclophosphamide + piroxicam vs 55 not treated
Outcome: disease-free interval (DFI) significantly longer for dogs receiving surgery plus metronomic chemotherapy than historical controls treated with surgery plus RT
Regimen: cyclophosphamide 10 mg/m^2 every 24–48 hours and piroxicam 0.3 mg/kg daily
Conclusion: metronomic therapy can effectively delay recurrence in select incompletely resected STS cases
Chemotherapy for STS
Study: 39 dogs with high-grade STS; 21 received surgery + doxorubicin; the rest had surgery alone
Outcome: MST ≈ 856 days; no overall chemotherapy benefit in this study
Interpretation: chemotherapy rarely provides clear benefit for STS overall; may be considered for aggressive (Grade III) variants, with realistic expectations
STS – Prognosis
Local disease control drives prognosis; distant metastasis plays a lesser role unless high-grade or aggressive
Negative prognostic indicators for local control:- Large tumor size;
Incomplete surgical margins;
High histologic tumor grade
Global recurrence after incomplete resection: ≈ 28% (range 7-32%)
Metastasis rate by grade: 10% (Grade I), 20% (Grade II), 30-50% (Grade III)
MST with surgery alone: ≈ 1,416 days (~4 years); worse with aggressive histotypes
Future Directions (STS)
Investigate reasons for local recurrence after apparently negative margins
Explore the relationship between local recurrence and systemic metastasis
Assess proliferation indices to improve prediction of local STS recurrence
Aim to improve biologic predictability of individual sarcomas
Feline Injection Site Sarcomas (ISS) – General Considerations
Emergence timeline: late 1980s; rabies vaccination laws led to heightened vaccine administration
Change in vaccines: killed rabies vaccine and FeLV vaccine administered SQ; aluminum adjuvant suspected to drive massive inflammatory responses and fibroblastic/myofibroblastic proliferation, potentially leading to tumor formation
ISS terminology: historically vaccine-associated sarcoma; now ISS acknowledges potential multifactorial etiologies (including interferon injections and microchips)
Incidence: ~1/1000-1/10000
Latency: time to tumor development ranges from ~4 weeks - 10 years post-vaccination
ISS are histologically and biologically more aggressive than conventional STS
Feline ISS – Pathophysiology and Lesion Characteristics
Perivascular macrophages may contain vaccine components in the lesion
Vaccine-associated link remains controversial; multiple etiologies implicated
ISS tumors can be infiltrative and challenging to resect with wide margins
Feline ISS – Presentation, Work-Up, and Diagnostics
Presentation: similar to conventional STS; mass at vaccination site, often with infiltrative growth
Diagnostic approach:- Cytology can suggest sarcoma but incisional biopsy is preferred to confirm ISS vs conventional STS and to justify aggressive surgical margins
Do not perform excisional biopsy; plan for extensive resection if ISS is confirmed
Imaging: CT recommended for surgical margin planning due to infiltrative margins
Feline ISS – 3-2-1 Rule for Suspected ISS
3: Mass persists x 3 months or longer post injection
2: Mass > 2 cm in diameter
1: Mass continues to increase in size > 1 month after injection
Proactive Planning for ISS – Tail Vaccine Considerations
Tail vaccine demonstrations and planning emphasize vaccination strategies to minimize ISS risk
Educational resources (e.g., Maddie’s Fund) promote best practice for vaccine administration in cats
Feline ISS – Injection Location Considerations
Injections should be given below the stifle (preferred) or below the elbow if given on an extremity
Accurate documentation and site selection are critical to facilitating future diagnosis and treatment planning
National Guidance and Industry Involvement
National Feline Vaccine-Associated Sarcoma Task Force endorses collaboration with pharmaceutical companies, which may assist with treatment costs if a vaccine-related ISS is diagnosed at the site of tumor formation
Feline ISS – Treatment and Surgical Margins
Current standard: surgical excision with 5 cm radial margins and 2 muscle planes deep, including involvement of body wall, soft tissue, or bone (e.g., dorsal scapula/spinous processes or limb)
Recurrence rate after this aggressive approach: ≈ 14%
Complication rate: ≈ 11%, with ~8% experiencing dehiscence
Historically reported local recurrence rates after ISS treatment: as high as 26-59%
The aggressive surgical approach remains the preferred strategy for local disease control
Feline ISS – Wide Excision (5 cm Margins)
Demonstrates robust local control with relatively manageable complication rates compared to historical data
Visuals and case studies emphasize the practical feasibility of wide margins in feline tumors
Feline ISS – Prognosis
Overall median survival time (MST) ≈ 901 days
MST for cats with recurrence ≈ 499 days; MST for cats without recurrence ≈ 1,461 days
Postoperative metastatic rate ≈ 20% (range up to 20% in some reports)
Cats with metastasis have poorer prognosis (MST ≈ 388 days) vs those without metastasis (MST ≈ 1,528 days)
Tumor recurrence and metastasis are significantly associated with poorer survival
Practical Connections and Real-World Relevance
STS management emphasizes complete initial surgical excision with adequate margins to maximize disease control and minimize the need for adjuvant therapies
When complete margins are not achievable, decision-making must weigh functional outcome, owner preferences, and realistic expectations for recurrence and metastasis
RT can improve local control in some cases but is not universally superior to thorough re-excision; case-by-case judgment is essential
Metronomic chemotherapy and targeted agents (e.g., doxorubicin, toceranib) may have selective roles, especially in incompletely resected tumors or challenging locations
ISS in cats requires early incisional biopsy, careful planning of injection sites to minimize risk, and consideration of aggressive surgical margins to optimize outcomes
Formulas and Quantitative References (LaTeX)
Prevalence and percentages:- 15% of canine cutaneous/SQ tumors; 7% in cats; ~1% of all malignancies
Margin and surgical planning:- Wide excision margins: 3 cm radial margin and 1 fascial plane or 2 muscle planes deep
Recurrence and metastasis statistics:- Local recurrence after incomplete resection: 28% (7-32%)
Metastasis by grade: Gr I: 10%, Gr II: 20%, Gr III: 30-50%
STS prognosis timeframes:- MST with surgery alone: MST = 1416 days
RT-associated MST: > 1851 days
STS marginal excision outcomes:- Margins: dirty 34%, close 34%, clean 31%
Local recurrence after marginal excision: 10.5%
Time to recurrence: approx 210, 450, 595, 700 days
Feline ISS: latency and incidence:- Incidence: 1/1000-1/10000
Time to development: 4 weeks - 10 years
ISS MST: 901 days (overall)
Postoperative mets: 20%
Important References to Remember for Exam Preparation
General STS: local aggressiveness with relatively low distant spread; focus on margins and grading
Surgical planning: prioritize first surgery; margins and fixation status are critical for outcomes
Adjunctive therapies: RT and chemotherapy have selective roles; metronomic chemotherapy can delay recurrence in incompletely resected STS
Feline ISS: strict surgical margins (5 cm) and deep planes; tail/injection-site planning to minimize risk; 3-2-1 Rule for ISS suspicion
Owner communication: discuss realistic outcomes, function preservation, and costs; ethical considerations in difficult locations