Personality psychology is the study of whole persons.
The goal is to understand the complexity and multifaceted nature of people, including their patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving.
Standard textbook definition: characteristic patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving.
However, the definition may overlook essential aspects such as values, dreams, skills, experiences, and life histories.
Understanding a whole person involves piecing together various aspects of personality.
As an empirical science, personality psychology necessitates data collection to understand individuals.
Four types of data are discussed:
S data: Self-reported data
I data: Informant reported data
L data: Life data
B data: Behavioral data
Definition: Data collected through asking individuals about themselves.
Examples of questions: How sociable are you? What are your feelings or beliefs?
Common methods for gathering S data: Surveys and questionnaires.
Online platforms: Qualtrics, Google Surveys, SurveyMonkey.
Traditional methods: Telephone interviews, face-to-face interactions.
Direct Insight: Provides a wealth of information directly from the individual.
Privileged Access: Only the individual can accurately describe their inner thoughts and feelings.
Definitional Truth: For certain psychological constructs (e.g., self-esteem), self-reports are the most valid measure.
Causal Force: Self-reported beliefs can initiate behaviors that reinforce those beliefs (self-fulfilling prophecies).
Biases: Respondents may enhance or underreport their traits (self-enhancement bias, humility bias).
Errors: Misunderstandings or mistakes can occur in responding to questions.
Overreliance: The ease of collection may lead researchers to overlook other informative data types.
Definition: Data that comes from other people who know the individual.
Informant reports are common in contexts such as references and recommendations.
Examples: Colleagues providing insights into a person's conscientiousness or students providing feedback about a professor.
Common Sense Insight: Informants can provide nuanced, context-sensitive views.
Real-World Basis: Observations are grounded in actual interactions and situations.
Causal Force: Informants' beliefs about an individual can influence that individual's behavior (expectancy effects).
Limited Context: Informants may not understand the individual in all aspects of their life.
Lack of Access: They do not have access to the individual’s private thoughts and feelings.
Potential Biases: Informants may have their own biases and may not accurately represent the individual.
Definition: Data collected through existing records of an individual’s life, such as academic performance, marriage licenses, etc.
Examples: Social media activity, official documents like birth or marriage certificates.
Objective and Verifiable: Documentation provides concrete evidence of behavior.
Intrinsic Importance: Life data reflects significant aspects of an individual's experiences and choices.
Multiply Determined: L Data may arise from various underlying reasons, making it hard to interpret.
Doesn't Inform Why: Records alone do not explain the motivations behind actions.
Definition: Data gathered through observation of individuals’ behavior in real-time or controlled environments.
Methods of collection include naturalistic observations, laboratory experiments, and physiological measures.
Objective Measurement: Direct observation can seem very reliable.
Diverse Contexts: Behaviors can be observed across different settings, providing breadth in study.
Costs and Logistics: Gathering behavioral data can be resource-intensive and complicated.
Interpretation Challenges: Observations may not be clear-cut, and researchers may misinterpret motives behind behaviors.
Each data type has its strengths and weaknesses, and none are superior in all circumstances.
Combining different data types (e.g., S data with B data) enhances understanding by cross-validating results.
The goal is to achieve a comprehensive understanding of personality through varied empirical evidence.