Administrative Issues Chapter 3
Administrative Issues in EMS Education
Federal Level Regulations
Overview: Numerous policies and procedures govern paramedic education, especially for initial certification.
Key Agencies and Organizations:
NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration): Sets educational standards and instructor guidelines.
Studies for Children: Specific regulations and considerations.
NASEMSO & NASMIC: Associations for EMS directors and training coordinators.
American College of Surgeons & American College of Emergency Physicians: Professional medical bodies.
National Registry of EMTs: Certification standards.
CoAEMSP: Committee on Accreditation for EMS Programs; enforces rules for CAAHEP.
CAAHEP: Accrediting body for paramedic programs.
FEMA: Involvement in certain aspects.
NFPA & International Association of Firefighters: Influence on some standards.
Peer Review: Scientific guidelines and standards.
State Level Regulations
State EMS Office: Regulatory guidelines, often through a state agency or Department of Health.
State Laws: Statutes impacting EMS education.
Local Accreditation: Regulations for schools at the local level.
Local Level Regulations
Agency Policies: Regulations within the specific EMS agency.
Educational Institutions: College, fire department, or hospital policies.
Example: Record Retention Policy
Complexity: Illustrates the challenge of adhering to multiple guidelines.
Varying Requirements:
National Registry: 7 years.
American Heart Association: 2 years.
State EMS Department: 4 years.
School/University/Tech Center: 5 years.
CAAHEP/CoAEMSP: Requires a policy but no specific duration.
Institutional Guidelines
Comprehensive Policies: Create a single policy that encompasses all requirements.
Adherence: Ensure policies adhere to local, program-specific, state, and federal guidelines.
Considerations for Creating Policies and Procedures
Safety: Prioritize safe practices.
Legality: Ensure compliance with legal requirements.
Best Practices: Incorporate current best practices.
Standards: Adhere to established standards.
Grant Requirements: Comply with grant stipulations.
Research: Base policies on relevant research.
Shared Governance
Collaborative Approach: Involve others in policy development.
Drafting and Input: Assign policy drafts to individuals for review and input from the group.
Approval Process: Final approval by the responsible authority after collaborative input.
Sharing Policies and Procedures
Multiple Channels: Use various methods to communicate policies.
Examples: Handbook, syllabus, online postings.
Integration: Align with mission statement, program goals, and job descriptions.
Avoiding Conflicts
Consistency: Ensure policies do not conflict with each other.
Example: Consistent minimum passing scores across all documents (e.g., handbook and syllabus).
Accountability: Clear policies enhance accountability.
Policy Considerations
Policy on: All possible scenarios.