International Relations 10 - Selected Topics

Announcements

  • Final exam: Monday, May 12, 4:00-7:00pm, PA 101
    • 50 multiple choice questions
    • 2-4 short answer questions
      • Short answer will focus on the last third of the class
      • Cumulative short answer
      • Choice for short answer questions
      • No length requirement
      • Instructions will be shared in advance
  • Elizabeth’s review session next week, extra office hours also.

Selected Topics

  1. AI/Technology and the Military
  2. President Trump’s Foreign Policy, Tariffs, and Financial Markets
  3. Sports and International Politics
  4. World Leaders’ Interactions
  5. Course Recap

AI/Technology and the Military

  • How is AI used in the military?
    • Surveillance and intelligence
      • Satellite and drone imagery, process data
      • Detects threats, targets, identify patterns
    • Autonomous and semi-autonomous systems
      • Vehicles (unmanned aerial vehicles) – AI for navigation, target recognition, decision-making
      • Track targets, guide munitions, prioritize threats
    • Cyber defense and offense
      • Detecting and responding to intrusions
      • Automated penetration testing, vulnerability discovery, malware
    • Command, control, decision support
      • Modeling battles, recommending actions, predict enemy responses
    • Simulations and training
    • Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS): “killer robots”
  • Key Arguments Against
    • Problems with autonomous weapons: “Technologies that change their own behaviour or adapt their own programming independently can’t be used with real control.”
    • Different from other weapons
      • Decisions about use are taken out of human hands, unclear who is responsible
      • Who judges proportionality, necessity? Who can explain decisions?
      • Dehumanizing
      • Profiling reinforces inequality
      • Equally susceptible to mistakes
    • Impossible to slow down
  • Key Arguments In Favor
    • Hammes: "Autonomous weapons are the moral choice."
    • “It is morally imperative for the US and other democratic nations to develop, field, and, if necessary, use autonomous weapons.”
    • Not different from other weapons
      • Decisions about use are still made by humans, commanders are still responsible
      • Not less dignified than being killed by conventional weapons
      • Equally susceptible to mistakes
    • Moral imperative to protect US troops, help achieve likelihood of victory
    • Impossible to slow down
  • Implications for the likelihood of conflict
    • Conflict more likely?
      • Lower political costs – less human and financial loss
      • Accelerates decision-making, so more potential for accidents and escalation
      • Big first-strike advantage (preventive war)
      • Arms racing – worsens security dilemma
    • Conflict less likely?
      • Strengthen deterrence by improving surveillance, early warning, and missile defense systems, making surprise attacks less viable
      • Targeting makes accidents and mistakes less likely, reducing the likelihood of escalation
      • Better modeling can make the costs of war more clear – reducing willingness to fight
  • Implications for the deadliness of conflict
    • Conflict more deadly?
      • No moral hesitation about targeting
      • More speed and scope of destruction
      • Potential for large-scale civilian harm by targeting critical infrastructure
    • Conflict less deadly?
      • Targeting: precision and proportionality, avoid civilian casualties and collateral damage
      • Reduces the number of humans on the battlefield: “robot on robot” instead of “human on human” fighting
      • Models could shorten wars by clarifying relative power balances early
  • Is this different from other military technologies?
    • The logic of deterrence
    • The costliness of war
    • Norms, international law

President Trump's Foreign Policy, Tariffs, and Financial Markets

  • Trump Foreign Policy
    • Ukraine: End conflict immediately, direct talks with Russia, major concessions for Ukraine
    • Fentanyl: Retaliation, pressure on Mexico, China, and Canada
    • Israel and Gaza: Initial ceasefire, no further progress, unwilling to put much pressure on Israeli administration, floated idea of US-managed territory in Gaza
    • Acquiring new territory in Greenland, Panama?
    • Collective security: Critiques of NATO allies, no membership for Ukraine
    • After earlier withdrawal from Iran nuclear deal, creating a new deal (that sounds like it will be the same)
  • Ashford: “Four Explanatory Models for Trump’s Chaos”
    1. Return to realpolitik (realism): Identifying threats, strategic interests, pressuring allies to increase collective security commitments, end commitment in Ukraine through negotiated settlement, refocus on Western hemisphere
      • Fails to explain policy on Israel, reduced spending on State/USAID, undermining the dollar and trade relationships - losing soft power
    2. Influence of domestic politics (in some senses, liberalism): Benefiting political constituencies and wealth donors
      • Fails to explain policy on Israel
    3. Return to early Trumpism/conventional neocon Republicanism: Sovereignty, hawkishness, unilateralism, interventionism
      • Fails to explain policy on Israel
    4. Conflicting factions: "Confusion and chaos of Trumpian foreign policy are due partly to the divergence between factions inside the administration as they contest for appointments and influence over policy."
      • Role of other political actors, e.g., Congress, advisors?
  • Tariffs
    • Last class, we talked about the trade war with China – but what about other countries?
      • Current Chinese tariffs on US exports are 147.6%147.6\%, US tariffs on Chinese exports at 124.1%124.1\% according to the Peterson Institute for International Economics
      • 10%10\% tariffs on most other countries, higher rates announced on other countries but currently paused
      • Importers must pay the tariff – some will eat the cost, some will pass on to consumers
    • Arguments:
      • Threatened tariffs as leverage on foreign governments
      • Actual tariffs will boost US manufacturing and protect jobs, weaken China, encourage US consumers to buy more American-made goods, increase investment by companies in the US, eliminate trade deficits
      • Income from tariff revenue to fund other projects
      • Johnson: Inherent contradiction
      • National security justification
  • Tariffs on cars
    • Many car industry supply chains cross borders
  • Tariffs: Impacts so far
    • Uncertainty! Volatility!
    • IMF cut global growth forecast
    • JP Morgan predicts US recession
    • Stock market crashes
    • Value of US dollar decreases relative to other currencies (depreciation) – not considered a safe asset
      • Increasing yields on Treasury notes, falling bond prices (means expectation of inflation)
  • Likely effects?
    • Prices passed through to consumers (estimates of 2000-$4000 per year)
    • Only 8%8\% of Americans work in manufacturing: unlikely to have large effects on the labor force more than 11 or 2%2\%.
    • Fed might raise interest rates in response to inflation
    • Other countries seeking trade deals with the US – administration has set a target of 90 deals in 90 days
    • Raise revenue? “the long run achievement of goals like bringing a lot of investment into the United States to replace the imports is going to undermine the goal of raising revenue”
    • Goals unlikely to be accomplished quickly
    • Where is the WTO?

Sports and International Politics

  • Are international sports political?
    • Apolitical – athletic competitions
    • Cooperative
      • Opportunities for leaders to meet on the sidelines and form alliances
      • Ping Pong Diplomacy between US and China in 1971
      • DPRK and ROK meeting at 2018 ROK Olympics
    • Sports as arenas to carry out conflict
      • Boycotts by Western states of 1980 Moscow Olympics over the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Soviet retaliation of boycotting 1984 Los Angeles Olympics
      • Terrorist attack on Israeli athletes in 1972 Munich Olympics
      • Banning South Africa from international support as a sanction of apartheid policies
      • Engendering nationalist or populist feelings, propaganda tool
      • Hitler’s Olympics in Berlin, 1936
    • TANS use to highlight human rights abuses
      • 2022 World Cup in Qatar
  • Sports Washing
    • Sportswashing: the practice of reputation-laundering in the hopes that a cleaner national image will translate into soft power
    • Distract from or hide negative reputational dimensions
      • Russia in 2008, 2014 distracting from invasions
      • China and Saudi Arabia distracting from HR violations
  • Sport and Soft Power
    • Soft power: the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than coercion or payment (Joseph Nye)
    • Investing in sports is a common way for developing countries to announce their arrival on the global stage
    • Sports as arenas to develop soft power
      • Saudi soccer
      • Beijing Olympics 2008
  • Sports and International Political Attitudes
    • Can exposure to celebrities from stigmatized groups reduce prejudice?
      • Mohamed Salah, a visibly Muslim, elite soccer player.
      • Hate crimes in the Liverpool area dropped by 16%16\% compared with a synthetic control after Salah joined Liverpool F.C.
      • Liverpool F.C. fans halved their rates of posting anti-Muslim tweets relative to fans of other top-flight clubs.
  • 2026 World Cup

World Leaders' Interactions

  • Do world leaders matter?
    • Realists: states behave the same
    • Liberals: different types of states act differently
    • But what about the importance of individual heads of states- their experiences, personalities, and relationships?
  • Leader characteristics
    • Military experience
    • Age
    • Birth order
    • Education
    • Gender
  • Leader Interactions
    • Different types of leader interactions
      • Bilateral meetings
      • Gift giving
      • Meeting in international organizations
    • In person or virtual? Advantages and disadvantages of each
      • Easy, access
      • Ability to communicate
      • Building trust, social bonding
  • Formality
  • Example: Indonesia
    • “On November 8th, less than three weeks into the top job, Mr Prabowo jetted off on a six-country world tour. The outing revealed a man desperate for the approval of his counterparts, over-confident in his own abilities and poorly counselled by a circle of novice advisers”
  • What else have we learned?
    • Causes of war: miscalculation, bargaining
    • Leaders’ incentives in fighting wars for survival
    • Leaders’ incentives (or lack of incentives) to negotiate over climate change

Course Recap

  • Puzzles: from the first week of the semester’s The Economist
    • Can Donald Trump maintain Joe Biden’s network of Asian alliances?
    • After 15 months of hell, Israel and Hamas sign a ceasefire deal
    • How the AfD got its swagger back
    • An initiative so feared that China has stopped saying its name (“Made in China”)
    • Marco Rubio will find China is hard to beat in Latin America
    • Iran is vulnerable to a Trumpian all-out economic assault
  • Course feedback
    • Official course eval