International Relations 10 - Selected Topics
Announcements
- Final exam: Monday, May 12, 4:00-7:00pm, PA 101
- 50 multiple choice questions
- 2-4 short answer questions
- Short answer will focus on the last third of the class
- Cumulative short answer
- Choice for short answer questions
- No length requirement
- Instructions will be shared in advance
- Elizabeth’s review session next week, extra office hours also.
Selected Topics
- AI/Technology and the Military
- President Trump’s Foreign Policy, Tariffs, and Financial Markets
- Sports and International Politics
- World Leaders’ Interactions
- Course Recap
AI/Technology and the Military
- How is AI used in the military?
- Surveillance and intelligence
- Satellite and drone imagery, process data
- Detects threats, targets, identify patterns
- Autonomous and semi-autonomous systems
- Vehicles (unmanned aerial vehicles) – AI for navigation, target recognition, decision-making
- Track targets, guide munitions, prioritize threats
- Cyber defense and offense
- Detecting and responding to intrusions
- Automated penetration testing, vulnerability discovery, malware
- Command, control, decision support
- Modeling battles, recommending actions, predict enemy responses
- Simulations and training
- Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS): “killer robots”
- Key Arguments Against
- Problems with autonomous weapons: “Technologies that change their own behaviour or adapt their own programming independently can’t be used with real control.”
- Different from other weapons
- Decisions about use are taken out of human hands, unclear who is responsible
- Who judges proportionality, necessity? Who can explain decisions?
- Dehumanizing
- Profiling reinforces inequality
- Equally susceptible to mistakes
- Impossible to slow down
- Key Arguments In Favor
- Hammes: "Autonomous weapons are the moral choice."
- “It is morally imperative for the US and other democratic nations to develop, field, and, if necessary, use autonomous weapons.”
- Not different from other weapons
- Decisions about use are still made by humans, commanders are still responsible
- Not less dignified than being killed by conventional weapons
- Equally susceptible to mistakes
- Moral imperative to protect US troops, help achieve likelihood of victory
- Impossible to slow down
- Implications for the likelihood of conflict
- Conflict more likely?
- Lower political costs – less human and financial loss
- Accelerates decision-making, so more potential for accidents and escalation
- Big first-strike advantage (preventive war)
- Arms racing – worsens security dilemma
- Conflict less likely?
- Strengthen deterrence by improving surveillance, early warning, and missile defense systems, making surprise attacks less viable
- Targeting makes accidents and mistakes less likely, reducing the likelihood of escalation
- Better modeling can make the costs of war more clear – reducing willingness to fight
- Implications for the deadliness of conflict
- Conflict more deadly?
- No moral hesitation about targeting
- More speed and scope of destruction
- Potential for large-scale civilian harm by targeting critical infrastructure
- Conflict less deadly?
- Targeting: precision and proportionality, avoid civilian casualties and collateral damage
- Reduces the number of humans on the battlefield: “robot on robot” instead of “human on human” fighting
- Models could shorten wars by clarifying relative power balances early
- Is this different from other military technologies?
- The logic of deterrence
- The costliness of war
- Norms, international law
President Trump's Foreign Policy, Tariffs, and Financial Markets
- Trump Foreign Policy
- Ukraine: End conflict immediately, direct talks with Russia, major concessions for Ukraine
- Fentanyl: Retaliation, pressure on Mexico, China, and Canada
- Israel and Gaza: Initial ceasefire, no further progress, unwilling to put much pressure on Israeli administration, floated idea of US-managed territory in Gaza
- Acquiring new territory in Greenland, Panama?
- Collective security: Critiques of NATO allies, no membership for Ukraine
- After earlier withdrawal from Iran nuclear deal, creating a new deal (that sounds like it will be the same)
- Ashford: “Four Explanatory Models for Trump’s Chaos”
- Return to realpolitik (realism): Identifying threats, strategic interests, pressuring allies to increase collective security commitments, end commitment in Ukraine through negotiated settlement, refocus on Western hemisphere
- Fails to explain policy on Israel, reduced spending on State/USAID, undermining the dollar and trade relationships - losing soft power
- Influence of domestic politics (in some senses, liberalism): Benefiting political constituencies and wealth donors
- Fails to explain policy on Israel
- Return to early Trumpism/conventional neocon Republicanism: Sovereignty, hawkishness, unilateralism, interventionism
- Fails to explain policy on Israel
- Conflicting factions: "Confusion and chaos of Trumpian foreign policy are due partly to the divergence between factions inside the administration as they contest for appointments and influence over policy."
- Role of other political actors, e.g., Congress, advisors?
- Tariffs
- Last class, we talked about the trade war with China – but what about other countries?
- Current Chinese tariffs on US exports are 147.6%, US tariffs on Chinese exports at 124.1% according to the Peterson Institute for International Economics
- 10% tariffs on most other countries, higher rates announced on other countries but currently paused
- Importers must pay the tariff – some will eat the cost, some will pass on to consumers
- Arguments:
- Threatened tariffs as leverage on foreign governments
- Actual tariffs will boost US manufacturing and protect jobs, weaken China, encourage US consumers to buy more American-made goods, increase investment by companies in the US, eliminate trade deficits
- Income from tariff revenue to fund other projects
- Johnson: Inherent contradiction
- National security justification
- Tariffs on cars
- Many car industry supply chains cross borders
- Tariffs: Impacts so far
- Uncertainty! Volatility!
- IMF cut global growth forecast
- JP Morgan predicts US recession
- Stock market crashes
- Value of US dollar decreases relative to other currencies (depreciation) – not considered a safe asset
- Increasing yields on Treasury notes, falling bond prices (means expectation of inflation)
- Likely effects?
- Prices passed through to consumers (estimates of 2000-$4000 per year)
- Only 8% of Americans work in manufacturing: unlikely to have large effects on the labor force more than 1 or 2%.
- Fed might raise interest rates in response to inflation
- Other countries seeking trade deals with the US – administration has set a target of 90 deals in 90 days
- Raise revenue? “the long run achievement of goals like bringing a lot of investment into the United States to replace the imports is going to undermine the goal of raising revenue”
- Goals unlikely to be accomplished quickly
- Where is the WTO?
Sports and International Politics
- Are international sports political?
- Apolitical – athletic competitions
- Cooperative
- Opportunities for leaders to meet on the sidelines and form alliances
- Ping Pong Diplomacy between US and China in 1971
- DPRK and ROK meeting at 2018 ROK Olympics
- Sports as arenas to carry out conflict
- Boycotts by Western states of 1980 Moscow Olympics over the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Soviet retaliation of boycotting 1984 Los Angeles Olympics
- Terrorist attack on Israeli athletes in 1972 Munich Olympics
- Banning South Africa from international support as a sanction of apartheid policies
- Engendering nationalist or populist feelings, propaganda tool
- Hitler’s Olympics in Berlin, 1936
- TANS use to highlight human rights abuses
- Sports Washing
- Sportswashing: the practice of reputation-laundering in the hopes that a cleaner national image will translate into soft power
- Distract from or hide negative reputational dimensions
- Russia in 2008, 2014 distracting from invasions
- China and Saudi Arabia distracting from HR violations
- Sport and Soft Power
- Soft power: the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than coercion or payment (Joseph Nye)
- Investing in sports is a common way for developing countries to announce their arrival on the global stage
- Sports as arenas to develop soft power
- Saudi soccer
- Beijing Olympics 2008
- Sports and International Political Attitudes
- Can exposure to celebrities from stigmatized groups reduce prejudice?
- Mohamed Salah, a visibly Muslim, elite soccer player.
- Hate crimes in the Liverpool area dropped by 16% compared with a synthetic control after Salah joined Liverpool F.C.
- Liverpool F.C. fans halved their rates of posting anti-Muslim tweets relative to fans of other top-flight clubs.
- 2026 World Cup
World Leaders' Interactions
- Do world leaders matter?
- Realists: states behave the same
- Liberals: different types of states act differently
- But what about the importance of individual heads of states- their experiences, personalities, and relationships?
- Leader characteristics
- Military experience
- Age
- Birth order
- Education
- Gender
- Leader Interactions
- Different types of leader interactions
- Bilateral meetings
- Gift giving
- Meeting in international organizations
- In person or virtual? Advantages and disadvantages of each
- Easy, access
- Ability to communicate
- Building trust, social bonding
- Formality
- Example: Indonesia
- “On November 8th, less than three weeks into the top job, Mr Prabowo jetted off on a six-country world tour. The outing revealed a man desperate for the approval of his counterparts, over-confident in his own abilities and poorly counselled by a circle of novice advisers”
- What else have we learned?
- Causes of war: miscalculation, bargaining
- Leaders’ incentives in fighting wars for survival
- Leaders’ incentives (or lack of incentives) to negotiate over climate change
Course Recap
- Puzzles: from the first week of the semester’s The Economist
- Can Donald Trump maintain Joe Biden’s network of Asian alliances?
- After 15 months of hell, Israel and Hamas sign a ceasefire deal
- How the AfD got its swagger back
- An initiative so feared that China has stopped saying its name (“Made in China”)
- Marco Rubio will find China is hard to beat in Latin America
- Iran is vulnerable to a Trumpian all-out economic assault
- Course feedback