criticisms of natural law
God did not create the world for a purpose
Jean Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, Bertrand Russell n Richard Dawkins
universe is ‘absurd’/’gratuitous’
universe is a ‘brute fact’
no design or purpose
How do we know what is natural?
the natural outworking of physical laws?
death is natural, so should we work to delay it?
huge implications for euthanasia
Q: “if death is ‘natural’, is it moral to prolong a person’s life with medical intervention?
Natural vs Culturally Acceptable
subordination of women and slavery used to be viewed as ‘natural’
in the past, it would have been seen as ‘unnatural’ for a women to be educated
is homosexuality unnatural?
Natural Law obscures basic moral differences
kai nielsen
anthropological research suggests that some primary precepts are not in fact universal
challenges idea of universal moral law
eg inuit cultural traditions: they kill members of the family before winter set in (if they believed these members were vulnerable or cause a burden to the wider family group)
vardy and grosch challenge aquinas’ view of sex
aquinas stated the every discharge of semen should be creative
however, sex could be justified in other ways, eg its benefits to a couple’s relationship
its rules can go against common sense
eg human teeth inc incisors and canines: does this mean we should all be omnivorous? are vegatarians acting immorally?
does humanity have a shared purpose?
natural law says we should all aim to have children: does this make nuns and monks immoral?
aquinas’ answer, that a few can choose this kind of lifestyle, seems inconsistent
the Bible does not always reflect a common human purpose
God can have diff plans n purposes for individuals eg Mary, prophets like Jeremiah
aquinas: use emotional maturity - but this introduces an element of subjectivity
what happens when diff purposes contradict each other?
purposes inc reproduction, loving God, learning, etc = could contradict each other
are people actually motivated by reason?
was aquinas too optimistic in his view of human nature and reason?
criticism from darwin’s evolutionary theory
living things are motivated by the will to survive
there is not enough attention paid to the Fall
because of the Fall, we are fundamentally flawed
we need the Bible and God’s revelation to know what is right
human reason is fallible
the naturalistic fallacy
G.E. Moore, Hume
not logically possible to look at facts and arrive at value judgements