Neck Pain with Radiating Pain

PHT 5321: Neck Pain with Radiating Pain

Overview

  • Presentation focuses on the impairment-based diagnosis of neck pain with radiating pain.

Major Pathoanatomical Conditions

  • Lateral Foraminal Stenosis

    • Accounts for 70% to 75% of cervical radiculopathy cases.

    • Result of space-occupying lesion within the intervertebral foramen.

    • Causes:

    • Changes to disc height.

    • Osteophyte formation from facet or uncovertebral joints.

    • Leads to reduced space for nerve root exit.

  • Herniated Nucleus Pulposus

    • Less common cause of cervical radiculopathy.

    • Unique anatomical features make it less vulnerable than lumbar spine injury.

Medical Screening Considerations

  • Important to consider additional diagnoses including:

    • Estrogenic diagnoses.

    • Serious neuromusculoskeletal conditions (e.g., spinal fractures, disruption of cervical stabilization structures).

  • Distinguishing symptoms of cervical radiculopathy vs. cervical myelopathy:

    • Radiculopathy: typically unilateral symptoms.

    • Myelopathy: can present bilaterally.

  • Thorough neurological examination indicated to differentiate between upper vs. lower motor neuron presentations.

    • Hyperreflexia and positive pathological reflexes suggest cervical myelopathy.

Differential Diagnosis

  • Consider other impairment-based diagnoses, upper quarter musculoskeletal conditions, including:

    • Neck pain with mobility impairments.

    • Neck pain with coordination impairments.

    • Neck pain with headaches.

  • Other pain sources:

    • Rotator cuff related shoulder pain.

    • Thoracic outlet syndrome.

    • Lateral epicondylalgia.

    • Radial nerve entrapment.

    • Carpal tunnel syndrome.

Nature and Mechanisms of Pain

  • Common structures involved: nerve root and disc (especially in cases of herniated discs).

  • Dominant pain mechanism for extremity symptoms: Neuropathic Pain

    • Can present as burning, shooting, or electric shock-like sensations, but may also feel sharp or achy.

    • Symptoms may include paresthesias, numbness, weakness, or simply pain.

  • Delayed onset of neuropathic pain or symptoms that worsen post-examination.

  • Sleep disturbances and psychological effects of neuropathic pain.

Symptom Onset and Behavior

  • Symptoms from lateral foraminal stenosis usually have a gradual onset due to degenerative changes.

  • Symptoms from disc herniations may have immediate/evolving onset.

  • Various factors affect symptom behavior, including:

    • Severity and irritability of symptoms.

    • Patient's subjective reports may vary based on underlying cause.

Aggravating and Easing Factors

  • Lateral Foraminal Stenosis:

    • Aggravating factors involve:

    • Cervical extension.

    • Ipsilateral rotation and side bending.

    • Axial compression.

    • Symptoms can peripheralize, meaning distal symptoms in the extremity worsen.

    • Easing factors include:

    • Cervical flexion.

    • Contralateral rotation.

    • Axial distraction.

  • Disc Herniations:

    • Aggravating positions include cervical flexion or protraction, causing increased tensile forces on the disc and nerve root.

    • Easing factors may involve cervical extension or retraction, alleviating tension on the posterior annulus.

    • Directional Preference:

    • Position of the neck during symptom centralization (positive response).

Clinical Examination

  • Initial Screening:

    • Determine appropriateness for physical therapy vs. additional medical evaluation.

    • Assess vital signs, especially if cardiovascular comorbidities present.

  • Neurological Exam:

    • Essential for determining baseline and monitoring neurological decline.

    • Evaluating for progressive worsening necessitates referral for medical evaluation.

  • Diagnostic Validity:

    • Tests have better validity for ruling in cervical radiculopathy than ruling out.

    • Constituents: dermatomes, myotomes, reflexes to improve positive likelihood ratios.

  • Orthopedic Tests:

    • Common examinations include Spurling A, distraction test, and arm squeeze test.

    • Arm squeeze test has adequate validity to rule in cervical radiculopathy if positive.

    • Lifetime Rate of Negative Features:

    • Alone and within broader assessment context provides insights.

  • Neurodynamic Testing:

    • Median nerve bias testing is effective for diagnostic screening.

  • Diagnostic Cluster:

    • Wainner cervical radiculopathy cluster criteria:

    • Positive ULTTA neural tension test.

    • Ipsilateral cervical rotation < 60 degrees.

    • Positive distraction test.

    • Positive Spurling A.

    • Outcomes regarding likelihood ratios influencing diagnostic confidence.

Prognosis

  • Generally favorable, with a self-limiting resolution in most cases (70% to 90% without surgery).

  • Factors affecting prognosis include:

    • Baseline pain intensity.

    • Self-reported disability.

    • Psychological factors (e.g., pain catastrophization).

    • Age, previous health history, regular exercise participation, prior neck pain, musculoskeletal disorders.

  • Condition Staging:

    • Factors should extend beyond time since injury; also include severity, irritability, stage of healing.

    • Understand tissue healing timeframes.

Treatment Selection

  • Guide interventions based on identified impairments and clinical practice guidelines.

  • Acute Stage Treatments (high irritability):

    • Educational collar use, exercises for mobilization and stabilization, short-term use of low-level laser therapy.

  • Chronic Stage Treatments:

    • Education, exercise (stretching, strengthening), manual therapy techniques, intermittent traction.

    • Coordination and endurance training for deep neck flexors.

    • Emphasis on ergonomic adjustments (increased lumbar lordosis, standing desks).

Clinical Prediction Rules

  • Developed by Nicole Raney for mechanical traction success:

    • Criteria: symptom peripheralization with PA testing, positive shoulder abduction test, age over 55, positive ULLTA, positive distraction test.

    • Probability of success based on meeting 3-4 criteria.

  • Caution with Clinical Prediction Rules:

    • Should not be solely relied upon without supporting clinical evidence.

  • Consider imaging only in the context of evaluating progressive neurological decline or lack of progress in treatment after 4-6 weeks.