Clinical Data
Core Clinical Indications and Performance Claims
Aquablation therapy is clinically proven to consistently remove prostate tissue independent of prostate size, prostate shape, or surgeon experience.
Operates with a demonstrated low risk of irreversible complications.
Serves as a primary benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment of choice across all prostate anatomies.
Clinical Efficacy and Safety Profile
Functional outcomes derived from a meta-analysis at 1 year post-operative follow-up across patients with prostate volumes ranging from (with presenting with an obstructive median lobe):
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Improvement:
Peak Urinary Flow Rate ():
Quality of Life Improvement (IPSS QoL):
Post-Void Residual (PVR) Improvement:
Ejaculatory Dysfunction Rate:
Erectile Dysfunction Rate:
Incontinence Rate:
Surgical Retreatment Rate: average annual surgical retreatment rate established at 5-year follow-up.
Key Clinical Studies and Evidence Base
WATER Study: First FDA pivotal study randomized against the gold standard, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP), for prostates sized (). Includes 5-year longitudinal follow-up results.
WATER II Study: First prospective multicenter FDA study successfully completed for large prostates sized ().
OPEN WATER Study: First multicenter all-comer study delivering real-world results in prostates ranging from for Aquablation therapy ().
TURP Comparative Benchmark: Evaluated in randomized comparison within prostates sized ().
Long-term efficacy parameters monitored across post-procedure months include:
Symptom Relief (IPSS)
Quality of Life (IPSS QoL)
Peak Urinary Flow Rate ( in )
Post-Void Residual Volume (PVR in )
Procedure Standardization and Resection Efficiency
Resection Duration: Average total resection time for Aquablation therapy is across pooled data from WATER and WATER II ().
TURP Resection Duration: Average resection time for TURP is in prostates sized .
Consistency: Aquablation achieves a standardized total resection time of regardless of prostate size or anatomical shape.
Hemostasis and Bleeding Management
Hemostasis Technique: Focal bladder neck cautery method.
Transfusion Rate: transfusion rate documented across patients.
Anatomical Volume Range: Evaluated in prostate sizes with a median volume of and a total range of .
Summary of Key Clinical Takeaways
Symptom Relief: Superior to TURP in symptom relief for prostates sized .
Ejaculatory Safety: Superior safety profile driven by significantly lower rates of ejaculatory dysfunction compared to TURP for prostates sized .
Broad Spectrum Efficacy: Delivers significant symptom relief across all prostates ranging from .
Large Prostate Safety: Represents the only treatment for large prostates () maintaining a low rate of irreversible complications.
Efficiency Consistency: Demonstrates consistent resection times across prostates ranging from .
Real-World Durability: Safety, efficacy, and efficiency outcomes are maintained in real-world clinical practice settings.
Risk, Safety, and Perioperative Considerations
General Risk Profile: All surgical treatments carry inherent side effects. Individual outcomes depend on patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and surgeon experience.
Device Claims: No claim is made that the AquaBeam® Robotic System will cure any medical condition or entirely eliminate diseased tissue. Repeated treatment or alternative therapies may be required. Rx Only.
Most Common Side Effects (Mild and Transient):
Mild pain or dysuria during urination
Pelvic discomfort
Hematuria (blood in urine)
Inability to empty the bladder (urinary retention)
Frequent and/or urgent need to urinate
Bladder or urinary tract infections (UTI)
Access and Anatomical Risks:
Ejaculatory dysfunction
Low risk of physical injury to the urethra or rectum at device access pathways
General surgical risks including anesthesia complications and infection risks (including potential transmission of blood-borne pathogens)
Potential Perioperative Risks and Adverse Events:
Anesthesia risk
Bladder or prostate capsule perforation
Bladder neck contracture
Bleeding or blood in urine
Bruising
Penile or pelvic pain
Irritative voiding symptoms (dysuria, urgency, frequency)
Systemic or localized infection
Transurethral resection (TUR) syndrome
Electric shock or thermal burn
Urethral damage causing false passage or stricture
Rectal incontinence or rectal perforation
Sexual dysfunction (including both ejaculatory and erectile dysfunction)
Incontinence or overactive bladder
Embolism
Urinary retention
Published Scientific References
Meta-Analysis Study: Elterman D. et al. Meta-analysis with individual data of functional outcomes following Aquablation for lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH in various prostate anatomies. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technologies. Jun 2021.
WATER 5-Year Trial: Gilling et al. Five-year outcomes for Aquablation therapy compared to TURP: results from a double-blind, randomized trial in men with LUTS due to BPH. CJU. Feb 2022.
WATER II 3-Year Trial: Zorn K. et al. Aquablation therapy in large prostates (80–150 cc) for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: WATER II 3-year trial results. BJUI Inter. Oct 2021.
OPEN WATER All-Comers Study: Bach T. et al. First Multi-Center All-Comers Study for the Aquablation Procedure. J Clin Med. Feb 2020.
Focal Cautery Bleeding Study: Elterman D. et al. Focal Bladder Neck Cautery Associated with Low Rate of Post Aquablation Bleeding. CJU. Apr 2021.
Corporate and Device Information
Device Name: AquaBeam® Robotic System
Manufacturer: PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation
Address: 900 Island Drive, Ste 101, Redwood City, CA 94065, United States
Official Website: www.procept-biorobotics.com
Trademarks: AQUABLATION, AQUABEAM, and PROCEPT BioRobotics are registered trademarks of PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation.
Document Identifier: ML0333.D
Copyright: © 2022 PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation. All rights reserved.