chapter 1 fraud

Chapter 1: Core Foundation Related to Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination

  • Course Code: BU5510

  • Course Title: Forensics & Fraud Examination

  • Instructor: Dr. Patrick O'Brien

Module 1: What is Fraud?

  • Definition of Forensic Accounting: The intersection of accounting and the law.

    • Consideration extends to employment damages from events like work injuries or fatal incidents.

    • Complexity requires more than just basic accounting data.

  • Definition of Fraud: An intentional deception, either by omission or commission, that results in economic loss to victims or gains to perpetrators.

    • Example: “Theft by deception”.

    • Economic Impact: The cost of fraud may reach up to $4.7 trillion annually, with an upward trend.

Legal Elements of Fraud

  • Four Essential Elements:

    1. A material false statement.

    2. Knowledge of the statement's falsity when made.

    3. Reliance on the false statement by the victim.

    4. Damages resulting from reliance on the false statement.

  • Methods of Money Relief:

    • Illegal money relief can occur by force, trickery, or larceny.

    • Fraud primarily employs trickery.

  • Legal Definition: Same in criminal and civil cases; however, criminal cases have a higher burden of proof.

Legal Elements of Fraud (Continued)

  • Definition of Larceny:

    • Felonious stealing involving taking, carrying, or driving away someone’s property without consent, with intent to deprive the owner of it.

  • Proving Larceny: Requires four elements:

    1. Taking or carrying away.

    2. Property belonging to another.

    3. Without owner’s consent.

    4. Intent to deprive owner of its use or possession.

  • Definition of Embezzlement:

    • The willful conversion of another's property lawfully possessed (e.g., via employment).

    • Distinction: Possession does not equal ownership.

Major Categories of Fraud

  • Asset Misappropriation:

    • Theft or misuse of organizational assets (e.g., skimming cash/checks, stealing inventory, payroll fraud).

  • Corruption:

    • Wrongful use of influence in transactions for personal gain, which contradicts duties to employers (e.g., kickbacks, conflicts of interest).

  • Financial Statement Fraud:

    • Intentional misrepresentation of financial or non-financial information (e.g., overstating revenues, understating liabilities).

    • Occurs less frequently (10% cases) but median loss is significant ($1 million), higher than asset misappropriation.

Major Categories of Fraud (Continued)

  • Fraud Scheme Categories and Statistics:

    • Asset Misappropriation:

    • Percentage: 86%

    • Median Loss: $100,000

    • Corruption:

    • Percentage: 50%

    • Median Loss: $150,000

    • Financial Reporting Fraud:

    • Percentage: 9%

    • Median Loss: $593,000

Types of Fraud

  • Types of Asset Misappropriation:

    • Cash theft, skimming, billing and payroll schemes.

  • Types of Corruption:

    • Bribery, illegal gratuities, conflicts of interest, invoice kickbacks, purchasing schemes, sales schemes, and bid rigging.

Difference Between Fraud and Abuse

  • Misconduct Not Constituting Fraud:

    • Includes abusive practices causing losses without rising to fraud (e.g., using company equipment inappropriately or personal business during work hours).

Module 2: What is Forensic Accounting?

  • Definition: Application of financial principles to facts/hypotheses within legal disputes consisting of:

    1. Litigation Advisory Services: Role as an expert or consultant.

    2. Investigative Services: Utilizing forensic skills, may or may not involve courtroom testimony.

  • Engagements: May include cases involving economic damages, workplace disputes, asset valuations.

  • Communication Skills: Essential for interaction with attorneys; engagements can have an adversarial nature.

Module 3: Professional Skill Set

  • Three Major Skill Types:

    1. Technical Competence: Accounting, auditing, finance, quantitative methods.

    2. Investigative Skills: Collection, analysis, evaluation of evidence; critical thinking.

    3. Communication Skills: Effectively conveying findings is crucial for success.

Module 4: Role of Auditing, Fraud Examination, and Forensic Accounting

  • Purpose of Financial Statement Auditing: Ensuring financial statements are free from material misstatement—note that immaterial misstatements do not require detection efforts.

  • Role of Fraud Examiners: Usually called post-suspicion to assist in fraud detection/prevention.

  • Forensic Accounting Functions: Include calculating economic damages, providing litigation support, deriving asset/business valuations.

The Role of Auditing, Fraud Examination, and Forensic Accounting (Continued)

  • Auditing Process:

    • Risk assessments, internal controls, planning, financial statement fraud detection, and evidence gathering.

  • Fraud Examination Process: Involves litigation support, economic damage calculations, and audits of businesses.

ACFE Report to the Nations

  • Median Loss in Fraud Cases:

    • Recorded losses show varying median amounts based on scheme type (e.g., billing, noncash, fraud against cash on hand).

    • Distribution of fraud cases and their respective median losses across different categories and regions indicates widespread impacts.

Fraud Detection and Detection Methods

  • Top Concealment Methods Used by Fraudsters:

    1. Created fraudulent physical documents (39%)

    2. Altered physical documents (32%)

    3. Created fraudulent electronic documents/files (28%)

    4. Altered electronic documents/files (25%)

    5. Destroyed/withheld physical documents (23%)

Internal Controls Effectiveness

  • Analyzing primary internal control weaknesses to understand potential fraud areas.

  • Areas such as job rotation, surprise audits, proactive monitoring, and formalized fraud policies play a critical role.

Behavioral Red Flags Displayed by Perpetrators

  • Identifying common behavioral traits typical in individuals committing occupational fraud helps in early detection.

    • Indicators: Financial difficulties, control issues, excessive pressure, and occupational insulation or secrecy.

Fraud Examination Methodology

  • Process: A structured approach for resolving fraud allegations, running from initiation to conclusion.

    • Includes gathering evidence, interviewing, report writing, and potentially testifying.

  • Predication: Required basis for a fraud examination, founded on reasonable suspicion backed by circumstantial evidence.

  • Fraud Prevention: Emphasizes creating environments with minimal fraud risks, involving effective internal controls and an ethical workplace.

Conclusion

  • Criminal and civil remediation involves the recovery of losses through various means, alongside modification of internal operational processes to mitigate future fraud incidents.

  • Evidence-based decision-making is essential in investigations and requires thorough, substantiated conclusions from the gathered data.