Lecture 9: Relativity
Lecture Notes: Relativity and Related Topics
Overview
This lecture focuses on:
Special Relativity
General Relativity
Tests of General Relativity (GR)
Interstellar Travel
UFOs/UAPs
Critical Thinking
Goals of the Module
By the end, students will be able to:
Describe the fundamental idea and postulates of Special Relativity.
Explain loss of simultaneity, time dilation, and length contraction.
Describe four observational tests of General Relativity.
Explain how relativity affects interstellar travel.
Describe evidence linked to UFOs/UAPs.
Detail examples of cognitive biases and sound habits of mind.
Interstellar Travel
Interest in Interstellar Travel: Hollywood's portrayal vs. scientific reality.
Pioneer 10 (1972):
First spacecraft from Earth to reach Jupiter (~628 million km away).
Distance to Nearest Star: Proxima Centauri is 4.25 light-years (ly) away.
Estimated travel time at current speeds: ~2 million years to Proxima Centauri.
Aldebaran's Distance: 68 ly away.
Current Spacecraft: Voyager 1 and 2 will not approach any star within 0.75 ly.
Speed record held by the NASA Parker Solar Probe: 690,000 km/h (430,000 mph) or 191 km/s.
Example: Would travel from NYC to Tokyo in 1 minute, but reaching Proxima Centauri would take 4250 years.
The Cosmic Speed Limit
Speed of Light (c): Universal speed limit at c = 3 x 10^8 m/s.
Special Theory of Relativity: A major obstacle for interstellar travel; speeds required exceed 10,000 ly at 0.1c.
Special Theory of Relativity
Relative Motion: Motion is only meaningful relative to a frame of reference.
Example: Plane traveling westward is stationary in Earth's frame while Earth rotates.
Postulates of Special Relativity:
The laws of nature are the same for all observers.
The speed of light in free space is constant.
Consequences:
Loss of Simultaneity: Events simultaneous in one frame may not be in another.
Time Dilation: Moving clocks run slower relative to stationary observers.
Length Contraction: Moving objects appear shorter in the direction of motion.
Example of Loss of Simultaneity:
Two observers see flashes of light; one sees them simultaneously while the other sees one before the other.
Addition of Velocities in Relativity
At high speeds, the addition of velocities requires adjustments:
If observer A sees B moving at speed $v1$ and B sees C at speed $v2$, the observed speed of C is not simply $v1 + v2$ but recalculated using relativistic formulas.
Effects of Time Dilation
Example of Time Dilation:
At $v = 0.87c$: 2 Earth years = spacecraft year.
At $v = 0.995c$: 10 Earth years = spacecraft year.
The Lorentz Factor
Definition: The factor quantifying time dilation and length contraction:
Formalism: Derived from simple geometry of spacetime changes.
Denote:
Proper time in the moving frame as $t_0$.
Relative time in another frame as $t$.
General Theory of Relativity
Core Idea: Gravity results from the curvature of spacetime; mass causes spacetime to curve, resulting in gravitation.
Spacetime: Four-dimensional continuity including three spatial directions (x, y, z) and time.
Consequences of General Relativity:
Gravitational Time Dilation: Clocks nearest a gravitational source run slower.
Gravitational Lensing: Light paths bend around massive objects.
Equations and Parameters
Parameters in GR are used to model gravity:
$𝛾$: Represents space curvature from unit mass.
$β$: Represents mass nonlinearity.
General relativity predictions have been quantified, validating GR vs. Newtonian physics:
GR values: $𝛾, β < 1e-5$.
Tests of General Relativity
Einstein's Proposed Tests:
Perihelion precession of Mercury's orbit.
Deflection of light by the Sun.
Gravitational redshift of light.
Irwin Shapiro's Test:
Time delay in radar signals traveling near the Sun.
Observational Evidence:
Gravitational waves have provided additional supportive evidence for GR.
Specific Observational Tests
Perihelion Precession:
Observed advance of Mercury's orbit by 43”/century, confirmed by GR.
Light Deflection:
Prediction from GR: 1.75 arcseconds, double Newtonian prediction of 0.875 arcseconds.
Confirmed by the 1919 solar eclipse.
Gravitational Redshift:
Light from massive bodies shifts towards red, confirmed with data from atomic clocks.
Gravitational Waves
Predicted by GR; ripples in spacetime triggered by massive objects.
Indirect evidence from binary pulsars (Taylor and Hulse, 1974).
Direct detection by LIGO, confirmed the merger of black holes (2017).
Wormholes and Time Travel
Concept: Hypothetical cosmic shortcuts, not yet proven plausible due to extreme energy requirements.
Theoretical Concerns:
Stability and causality issues in creation of and travel through wormholes.
Energy Requirements for Interstellar Travel
Example of energy needed to travel:
Required to accelerate a starship to 10% of c takes: E= rac{1}{2}mv^2 = 4.5 imes 10^{22} ext{ Joules}.
This amount is roughly 100 times the world’s entire annual energy consumption.
Theoretical Limits: As speed approaches light, achieving acceleration becomes more difficult.
Tides and Gravitational Effects
Tides: Result from gravitational interactions, notably with the Moon and Sun.
Strength of tides is proportional to rac{M}{d^3} where M = mass of the tide-raising body and d = distance to it.
Tidal effects alter planetary rotations and orbits over time.
Tides and Celestial Bodies
Example: Earth's rotation slows at a rate of 2 ms/century due to tidal friction.
Synchronous Rotation: The Moon’s rotation period matches its orbital period due to tidal locking.
Cognitive Biases and Critical Thinking
Definition of Cognitive Bias: A tendency to think in specific ways that can lead to systematic deviations from rationality.
Examples of Cognitive Biases:
Anchoring Bias: Relying too much on initial information.
Confirmation Bias: Focusing only on confirming evidence.
Availability Bias: Overestimating likely outcomes based on recent events.
Fallacies in Argumentation
Definition of a Fallacy: Incorrect reasoning in argumentation.
Examples:
Ad Hominem: Focusing on the individual instead of the argument.
Begging the Question: Assuming the premise in the conclusion.
Red Herring: Diverting attention from the main issue.
UFOs/UAPs and Scientific Scrutiny
UFO/UAP Reports: Majority are debunked or explained as natural phenomena or misidentifications.
Conspiracy Theories: Often arise from biases; claims of cover-ups lack substantial evidence.
Scientific Approach: Critical thinking and peer review are essential for discerning truth in UFO claims.