Finn Theory & Practice 11-12
Chapter 11
Capital
A firmโs sources of financing to fund its assets
Preferred Stock
Long-term Debt
Common Stock
Capital Structure: The relative proportions of debt, equity, and other securities that a firm has outstanding
Cost of Capital: Reflects the average riskiness of all the securities the firm has issued
Indicates how the market views the risk of those assets
The return to an investor (required return) is the same as the cost to the company (cost of capital)
A firm must earn at least the required return to compensate investors for the financing they have provided
Cost of Capital can be helpful for:
Capital budgeting decisions
Financing decisions
Operating decisions
Cost of Debt
The required return that lenders require on the companyโs new debt
Estimated by computing the Yield-to-Maturity (YTM) on the existing long-term debt
YTM: Return bond purchasers would earn if they held the debt to maturity and received all the payments as promised
๐ช๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ = ๐นD = ๐๐ป๐ด
Debt and Equity are not equal in the eyes of the firm
We need to consider TAX
We are concerned with after-tax cash flows
Debt gets a tax advantage (interest paid on debt is tax-deductible)
This reduction in taxes reduces the Cost of Debt
Equity does not have tax advantage (dividends are not tax deductible)
๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ = ๐นD โ (๐ โ ๐ปC)
where TC is the Corporate Tax Rate
Capital Structure Weights
Weights of each source of funds
Always use the target weights (if not available, use market values)
A firmโs market value is the sum of the market value of each capital
MV of Firm = MV of Debt + MV of Equity + MV of Preferred Stock
V = D + E + PS
D = # of outstanding bonds * market price of each bond
E = # of outstanding common stock * market price of each common stock
PS = # of outstanding preferred stock * market price of each preferred stock
The capital structure weights must always add up to 100%
WD: % financed with Debt
WE: % financed with Equity
WPS: % financed with Preferred Stock
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
WACC represents the overall return the firm must earn on its existing assets to maintain the value of the firm
The required return on the firmโs assets, based on the marketโs perception of the risk of those assets
Do not find the dollar amount; it should be a percentage
Decrease debt, increase equity, tax goes up, tax savings will be less
๐พ๐จ๐ช๐ช = [WD โ RD โ (๐ โ TC)] + [WE โ RE]
๐พ๐จ๐ช๐ช = [WD โ RD โ (๐ โ TC)] + [WE โ RE] + [WPS โ RPS]
Factors that influence a companyโs WACC
Uncontrollable Factors:
Market conditions (especially interest rates)
The market risk premium
Tax rates
Controllable Factors:
Capital structure policy
Dividend policy
Investment policy
Firms with riskier projects generally have a higher cost of equity
Divisional/Project Costs of Capital
Can we use WACC as the appropriate discount rate for different divisions or for specific
projects to make a decision?
The WACC reflects the risk and the target capital structure of the firmโs existing assets as a whole
Using the WACC as a discount rate is only appropriate for projects/divisions that have the same risk as the firmโs current operations
Divisions and different projects often require separate discount rates because of the relative risk of each division
If a single WACC was used for every division:
Riskier divisions would get more investment capital
Less risky divisions would lose the opportunity to invest in positive NPV projects
Project Risk Differentiation
How can we calculate the appropriate discount rates?
The Pure Play Approach
Find one or more companies that specialize in the product or service that we are considering
Compute (or research) the beta for each company and take the average of the betas
Use that beta along with the CAPM to find the appropriate return for a project of that identical risk
The Subjective Approach
Consider the projectโs risk relative to the firm overall
If the project has more risk than the firm, use a discount rate greater than the WACC
If the project has less risk than the firm, use a discount rate less than the WACC
Floatation costs increase the cost
Beta increases, the company is riskier, the cost of equity goes up, WCA would go up
Chapter 12
Capital Budgeting
The process of identifying, evaluating, and selecting long-term investments that contribute to the firmโs goal of maximizing ownersโ wealth
Why is it so important?
Analysis of potential projects
Long-term decisions
Large expenditures
Difficult/impossible to reverse
Determines the firmโs strategic direction
Decision Rule Criteria
Adjust for the time value of money
Adjust for risk
Provide information about creating value for the firm
Consider all cash flows
Allow to rank projects
Net Present Value (NPV)
The measure of the difference between the market value (benefit) of an investment and its cost
Estimate NPV by using Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) valuation techniques
NPV measures the contribution of a particular investment to the firmโs wealth
NPV is the dominant method, always prevailing over others
The Net Present Value (NPV) Rule is
Accept any investment that has a positive NPV (NPV > $0)ย ย ย ย
Reject any investment that has a negative NPV (NPV < $0)
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
On an investment, the required return is the return that results in a zero NPV when it is used as the discount rate.
Most important alternative to NPV
Based on the estimated cash flows and independent of interest rates
Intuitively appealing
The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Rule is
Accept any investment if the IRR is greater than the required return
Reject any investment if the IRR is less than the required return
Try to find a single rate of return (internal) that summarizes the merits of a project
Only depends on the cash flows, not on rates offered elsewhere
NPV vs. IRR
Non-Conventional Cash Flows
Cash flow sign changes more than once
Multiple rates of return problem
Mutually Exclusive Projects
Taking one investment prevents the taking of another
The scale of investments is substantially different
The timing of cash flows is substantially different
Will not reliably rank projects
NPV or IRR:
IRR approach assumes that the firm reinvests intermediate cash inflows at a rate equal to the projectโs IRR
NPV approach implicitly assumes that the firm can reinvest intermediate cash inflows at the cost of capital (more realistic)
Whenever there is a conflict between NPV and another decision rule, always use NPV
Profitability Index
Measures the benefit per unit cost, based on the time value of money
Present value of the future cash flows divided by the initial investment (very similar to NPV)
Also called the benefit-cost ratio (the value created per dollar invested)
Decision Rule
Accept the project if the profitability index is more than 1
Reject the project if the profitability index is less than 1
Payback Period
The time it takes to generate cash inflows sufficient to recover the initial cost of the investment
Based on the notion that an investment pays back the initial investment quickly is good
Estimate the cash flows from the project
Subtract the future cash flows from the initial cost
Decision Rule
Accept the project if the payback period is less than the preset limit
Reject the project if the payback period is more than the preset limit
Payback Period ignores the time value of money
Discounted Payback Period finds the point in time at which the project reaches a zero NPV
Find the PV of each cash flow
Use the discounted cash flows to find the Payback Period
Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)
Controls for some problems with IRR (such as multiple rates)
Discounting Approach
Discount future cash outflows to the present and add to the initial cash outflow
Reinvestment Approach
Compound all future cash flows to the end
Combination Approach
Discount future cash outflows to the present and add to the initial cash outflow
Compound all future cash inflows to the end
MIRR will be a unique number for each method
Mutually Exclusive Projects (Unequal Lives)
Different lives?
Replacement Chain (Common Life)
Repeat (replicate) each project in the future so that they will both terminate in a common year
Calculate NPV using the adjusted cash flows for both projects
Equivalent Annual Annities (EAA)
Convert the unequal annual cash flows of a project into a constant cash flow stream (an annuity) whose NPV is equal to the NPV of the initial stream
Do for both projects and compare the annuities
Several potentially serious weaknesses
If inflation occurs, then replacement equipment will have a higher price, and both sales prices and operating costs will probably change
Replacements that occur down the road would probably employ new technology, which in turn might change the cash flows
Difficult to estimate the lives of most projects
Economic Life vs. Physical Life
Projects are normally evaluated under the assumption that the firm will operate them over their full physical lives
May be better to terminate a project before the end of its potential life (EX, because of high maintenance costs)
Economic Life
The number of years a project should be operated to maximize its Net Present Value (often less than the maximum potential life)
To find the economic life
Consider all cash flows (including salvage value from the sale of assets
Find the projectโs NPV under different assumptions about how long it will be operated
Analyzing The Project
Sensitivity Analysis
Determines how the NPV changes as a single underlying assumption is changed, holding the other assumptions constant
Break-Even Analysis
Determines the level of an input that causes the NPV of the investment to equal zero
Can also perform Accounting Break-Even analysis (determine the level of a particular parameter for which a projectโs EBIT is zero)
Scenario Analysis
Determines how the NPV changes as several underlying assumptions are changed simultaneously