(topic 2)
The Sociological perspective
What is Sociology?
Sociology is the scientific study of human society & social behavior.
Sociological perspective of the self is based on the assumptions that human behavior is influenced by group life.
A particular view of oneself is formed through interactions with other people, groups, or social institutions.
Sociological perspective draws on the principles and concepts of well known sociologists to foster student understanding of sociology and how sociology impact students' everyday lives, and provide a pathway to self understanding of "who you are" and "what you are" in contemporary society.
Sociology as a scientific study of social groups and human relationships generates new insights into the interconnectedness between the self and other people.
Sociologists offer theories to explain how the self emerges as a product of social experience.
Looking-Glass Self
Charles Horton Cooley
Looking-Glass Self: The interactive process by which we develop an image of ourselves based on how we imagine we appear to others-other people act as a mirror, reflecting back the image we project through their reactions to our behavior
People adjust their self-image continually as they reinterpret the way they think others view them.
Development is a three step process:
we imagine how we appear to others
based on their reactions to us, we attempt to determine whether others view us as we view ourselves
we use our perceptions of how others judge us to develop feelings about ourselves.
Three Step Process
Step One: We imagine how our personality and appearance appears to others
Attractive/unattractive, heavy/slim, friendly/unfriendly
Step Two: We imagine how other people judge the appearance we think we present in step one
How do we think they feel about us
Step Three: We develop a self-concept based on how we feel we are judged in step two
If we are judged in a good way, we have a favourable self-concept
If we are judged in a bad way, we have an unfavourable self-concept
"I am not who you think I am;
I am not who I think I am;
I am who I think you think I am."
- Charles Cooley
Mead's Development Stages of the Self
George Herbert Mead
"I": The self as subject who makes decisions and takes actions based on his or her desires
"Me": The self as object as the person is regarded by others
Take the role of the other: To understand how others view the situation and what it means from their perspective
Generalized other: The collective attitudes of the entire community regarding how they are expected to behave
Mead's theory of the social self is based on the perspective that the self emerges from social interactions, such as:
observing and interacting with others
responding to others' opinions about oneself
and internalizing external opinions and internal feelings about oneself
The social aspect of self is an important distinction because other sociologists and psychologists felt that the self was based on biological factors and inherited traits.
According to Mead, the self is not there from birth, but it is developed over time from social experiences and activities.
Mead's Theory of Development of Self
Mead furthered Cooley's theory of looking-glass self. He stated that some people are more important to us than others.
Significant others - those people whose judgments are most important to our self-concept (mother, father, grandparents, playmates, etc.)
Role taking - the process which allows us to take the viewpoint of another individual and then respond to ourselves from that imagined viewpoint. A cognitive process that permits us to play out scenes in our mind.
According to Mead, three activities develop the self: language, play, and games:
Language develops self by allowing individuals to respond to each other through symbols, gestures, words, and sounds.
Play develops self by allowing individuals to take on different roles, pretend, and express expectation of others. Play develops one's self-consciousness through role-playing.
Games develop self by allowing individuals to understand and adhere to the rules of the activity. Self is developed by understanding that there are rules in which one must abide by in order to win the game or be successful at an activity.
According to Mead's theory, the self has two sides or phases: 'me' and ‘I’:
The 'me' is considered the socialized aspect of the individual. The 'me' represents learned behaviors, attitudes, and expectations of others and of society.
The 'I', therefore, can be considered the present and future phase of the self. The 'I’ represents the individual's identity based on response to the 'me’.
The 'me' and the 'I' have a didactic relationship.
Geertz and his concept of the self as an Unfinished Animal
Clifford Geertz
"We are, in sum, incomplete or unfinished animals who complete or finish ourselves through culture..." (49);
"Between what our body tells us and what we have to know in order to function, there is a vacuum we must fill ourselves, and we fill it with information (or misinformation) provided by our culture" (50);
"Our ideas, our values, our acts, even our emotions, are, like our nervous system itself, cultural products - products manufactured, indeed, out of tendencies, capacities, and dispositions with which we were born..." (50).
THE COLLECTIVE SELF
Harry Triandis
Distinguishes three aspects of self: private, public, and collective.
Private self: The way a person understands him-or himself (I'm a hard-working student).
Public Self: The way that a person is perceived by others (others think I'm smart).
Collective self: A person's sense of belonging to a social group
SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY
TAJFEL AND TURNER, 1979
This theory is all about becoming part of different groups, and how membership to these groups helps construct our identities.
They suggested that people have an inbuilt tendency to categorise themselves into one or more in-groups, building a part of their identity on the basis of membership of that group and enforcing boundaries with other groups.
THE THREE ELEMENTS
Tafjel and Turner decided that Social Identity can be considered in four ways; for our studies we will look at three:
Categorization
Identification
Comparison
CATEGORISATION
This looks at the way in which people put others (and ourselves) into categories. We label one another based on interest, ethnicity, gender, occupation and other factors.
Calling someone a Muslim, footballer, student, emo, mother, for example, are ways in which we do this.
IMPORTANT - this is not always negative and is different to stereotyping.
IDENTIFICATION
Once a social identity has been identified, people will choose to associate with certain groups.
Your collective identity becomes your in-group. This could be you family, a friendship group - even your class. This closeness functions to boost our self esteem and to create a sense of belonging.
A group or individual that poses as a threat to your in-group is called the out-group. Examples of this would be an outside family member, a new member to class, someone from a different ethnic background, or more close to home, somebody from the other side of the social area!
COMPARISON
People compare themselves and their groups with other groups, seeing a favourable bias towards the group in which they belong.
Nowadays we see younger people dividing themselves into social groups or subcultures based on clothing, the music they listen to or other interests. Examples of this are emos, goths and hoodies.
Individualism and Collectivism
Individualist culture is a culture in which the goals of the individual take precedence over the goals of the group.
Collectivist culture is a culture in which the goals of the group take precedence over the goals of the individual.
Individualism and Collectivism
The distinction lies in what extent to which cultures promote individual values over collective values.
There is a correlation...
Individualist cultures tend to be economically rich.
Collectivist cultures tend to be economically poor.
Also applies on a personal level.
That is, one can personally be collectivist while his or her culture is individualist.
Cooperation versus competition
Importance of in-group and out-group members
In other words
In an individualist culture, members are responsible for themselves and, perhaps, their immediate families.
In a collectivist culture, members are responsible for the group as a whole.
In an individualist culture, success is measured by how far one stands out from the crowd
EX: self-made millionaires, employees of the month.
In a collectivist culture, success is measured by one's contributions to the group as a whole.
EX: loyalty to company or country, specialized skills.