Chapter Review on Predation, Symbiosis, and Evolution
Introduction to Predator-Prey Dynamics
Cost of Defense Mechanisms
Predator’s choice to attack or not involves energy allocation for fighting or fleeing.
Results in the potential for energy loss and risk of injury.
Escape Strategies
Running Away
Animals utilize unpredictable movement patterns when escaping predators.
Notable examples:
Grasshoppers: Jumping high with erratic movements.
Rabbits: Zigzag patterns to evade foxes or dogs.
Antelope and Cheetahs: Cheetahs must adjust their approach as antelopes change direction rapidly.
Cephalopods: Ink release enables an escape by obscuring their presence.
Physical Defenses
Armor
Turtles have shells providing protection for soft body parts.
Triceratops: Fossils show adaptation in neck protection through thick shields.
Armadillo: Keratinized skin resembles a shell, enhancing protection.
Beetles: Thick protein-based shells can deter predation without calcification.
Mass Production as Defense
Semelparity and Nesting
Release large quantities of offspring simultaneously to overwhelm predators.
Two primary advantages:
Confuses predators regarding which offspring to attack.
Can satiate predators quickly, allowing some offspring to survive.
Examples include:
Cicadas: Emerge en masse every 17 years.
Lobsters: Release hundreds of thousands of larvae overnight.
Combination of Defense Techniques
Examples in Lobster Defense:
Weapons such as claws and spiny structures act as physical deterrents.
Use of sound to repel predators and bright colors signaling unpalatability.
Specific Examples of Defensive Strategies
Camouflage:
Example: Flounder blending into the sand.
Schooling:
Safety in numbers helps deter predators.
Intimidation and Weaponry:
Porcupines using quills to threaten predators.
Inducible Defenses
Efficiency in Defense Mechanisms
Costs incurred to create defenses mean they are only activated when predators are present.
Mussels Example:
Increase shell thickness and thistle thread strength when sensing predators.
Data Comparison Experiment:
Without predators: Shell strength ~15-16 newtons.
With predator scent: Shell strength increased to over 40 newtons.
Comparative Physiology of Inducible Defenses
Shell thickness changes based on predator presence incorporate protein links and calcification.
Volume and surface area considerations illustrate significant changes due to increased thickness.
Evolutionary Implications in Defensive Strategies
Symbiotic Relationships
Three main types:
Mutualism: Benefits both organisms. E.g., plants with nitrogen-fixing bacteria.
Commensalism: One benefits, the other is unaffected. E.g., clownfish and anemone.
Parasitism: One benefits at the expense of another. E.g., heartworms in pets.
Types of Mutualism:
Facultative: Both can live independently but thrive together.
Obligate: Species cannot survive without each other.
Types and Mechanisms of Predation
Ectoparasites vs Endoparasites
Ectoparasites: External feeders; e.g., mosquitoes.
Endoparasites: Internal feeders; can be dangerous if populations grow too large, potentially causing starvation of hosts.
The Arms Race Metaphor in Evolution
A constant evolutionary battle between predator adaptations and prey defensive techniques resulting in varying success rates for each side.
Honest Signals:
Example: Monarch butterflies ingesting toxic cardiac glycosides from milkweed, retaining toxins to protect from predators.
Historical Perspectives in Evolutionary Theory
Aristotle: Early classification of organisms, linked to biblical perspectives.
Linnaeus: Developed binomial nomenclature, recognized some species could change; influenced modern taxonomic methods.
Nicholas Steno: Father of stratigraphy; introduced fossil record principles and layering.
Georges Cuvier: Established extinction concepts, studied fossil layers; catastrophism theory.
William Smith: Created first geological maps connecting fossils to specific rock layers across ages.
Charles Lyell: Influenced Darwin with the concept of gradual change in geological processes.
Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck: Proclaimed ideas of adaptation and species change due to environmental alterations.
Closing Remarks and Transition to Evolution
Understanding the dynamics of predator-prey relationships highlights broader principles of evolution and adaptation in ecological contexts.
🧩 COMMUNITY ECOLOGY
⭐ What is a Community?
A community = all interacting populations (different species) in a defined area.
Focuses on interactions between species
Includes plants, animals, microbes, fungi, etc.
⭐ Emergent Properties of Communities
Community-level characteristics that arise from interactions among species.
Property | Meaning |
|---|---|
Scale | Defined spatial area (forest, pond, gut microbiome) + time scale |
Spatial structure | Physical arrangement of organisms & niches (vertical layering in forest, zonation on shorelines) |
Temporal structure | How community composition changes through day/season/year (diurnal predators vs nocturnal ones, seasonal blooms) |
Species richness | # of species in community |
Species diversity | Richness + relative abundance (evenness) |
Trophic structure | Feeding relationships & energy flow levels (food web, chains) |
Succession & disturbance | Predictable recovery after disturbance; primary vs secondary succession |
⭐ Biodiversity
Biodiversity = number AND variety of organisms in a region.
Can be measured at:
Genetic level (variation within species)
Species level (richness/diversity)
Ecosystem level (variety of habitats)
Importance
Increases ecosystem productivity, resilience, and stability
Maintains nutrient cycling, pollination, food webs, disease resistance
Productivity relationship
Higher ecosystem productivity → higher biodiversity
Why? More resources → more niches
Measuring diversity
Species richness + evenness
Indices (Shannon Index, Simpson Index) used to compare communities over time or across sites
⭐ Niche Concepts
Term | Definition |
|---|---|
Fundamental niche | Full potential range species could occupy w/out competition |
Realized niche | Portion actually occupied due to competition/predation |
Competitive Exclusion Principle
Two species cannot occupy the exact same niche indefinitely.
Outcomes:
Extinction of one species
Niche differentiation (Resource partitioning)
Character displacement (evolution of traits to reduce competition)
Examples:
Darwin’s finches evolving different beaks for food sources
⭐ Energy Flow & Trophic Levels
Key rule: Energy flows one way; nutrients cycle
Trophic Level | Notes |
|---|---|
Primary producers | Autotrophs (plants, algae); sunlight + nutrients limit productivity |
Primary consumers | Herbivores |
Secondary consumers | Eat herbivores |
Tertiary consumers | Top predators (not always present) |
Decomposers | Fungi/bacteria break down dead organisms |
Detritivores | Consume waste (dung beetles, worms) |
10% rule
Only ~10% of energy moves up a trophic level (5-20% range)
Most lost as heat/respiration
Top-down control
Predators regulate lower levels (keystone species)
Removing wolves causes elk explosion → tree decline
Bottom-up control
Productivity (# of nutrients, sunlight) limits food web size
⭐ Species Interactions
Interaction | Effect on Species 1 | Effect on Species 2 | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
Mutualism | + | + | Bees & flowers (obligate vs facultative) |
Commensalism | + | 0 | Barnacles on whales |
Parasitism | + | – | Tapeworms, ticks |
Predation | + | – | Wolf eats deer |
Herbivory | + | – | Caterpillar eats leaf |
Competition | – | – | Two species compete for one resource |
Amensalism | – | 0 | Elephants crushing plants |
Ways to avoid predation
Camouflage, mimicry, schooling, warning coloration, chemical defense, armor, speed, spines
🌍 EVOLUTIONARY IDEA FOUNDATIONS
⭐ Geological Influence & Age of Earth
Scientist | Contribution |
|---|---|
Steno | Fossils formed in layers; Law of Superposition |
Hutton | Gradual processes → deep time (slow change) |
Lyell | Uniformitarianism = Earth changes slowly and steadily; huge influence on Darwin |
Smith | Geological maps & index fossils to identify strata |
Big shift
Earth = old (millions+ years, not 6,000)
Slow gradual changes allow evolution time
⭐ Early Biological Thinkers (Pre-Darwin)
Name | Contributions |
|---|---|
Buffon | Species change, common ancestry, environment drives change |
Erasmus Darwin | Common descent, competition drives change |
St. Hilaire | Homology (common structures), common body plans |
Cuvier | Catastrophism, fossils show successive life forms |
⭐ Lamarck’s Theory (First Evolution Model)
Key principles:
Organisms seek complexity/perfection
Use & disuse alters organs
Inheritance of acquired traits
Changes accumulate → new species
Examples he used:
Giraffe neck stretches → longer neck in offspring
Snakes lost limbs from disuse
Cave animals losing eyes
Incorrect aspects
Acquired traits aren't inherited genetically
(except limited epigenetic cases — gene expression changes, not DNA sequence)
⭐ Darwin & Wallace’s Theory of Natural Selection
Observations
More offspring produced than survive
Variation exists within populations
Variation is heritable
Inferences
Some variations give survival/reproduction advantages
Advantageous traits increase in population over generations
Leads to adaptation & eventual speciation
Key Influences:
Malthus: human population growth → competition & struggle for existence
⭐ Key Differences: Darwin vs Lamarck
Lamarck | Darwin/Wallace |
|---|---|
Change from use/disuse | Change from heritable variation |
Traits acquired during life inherited | Only genetic traits inherited |
Evolution is purposeful toward complexity | Evolution has no goal, shaped by environment |
No extinction | Extinction is real |
Organisms "try" to evolve | Nature selects existing variation |
✅ NS 201 Exam 2 Master Notes — Part 2
🧬 Darwin, Wallace, Malthus, Lamarck & Evolution Theory
⭐ Thomas Malthus
Wrote Essay on the Principle of Population
Observed:
Human population grows geometrically
Food production grows arithmetically
Population > resources → competition, struggle
Influenced Darwin & Wallace: not all survive → selection pressure
⭐ Lamarck's Evolution Theory
Mechanisms he proposed:
Organisms strive toward complexity
Use & disuse
Frequently used structures strengthen & increase
Unused structures shrink
Inheritance of acquired characteristics
Traits gained during lifetime passed to offspring
Accumulation leads to new species
Examples Lamarck used:
Giraffes stretch necks → longer neck offspring
Snakes lost limbs via disuse
Cave animals lose eyes
Why Lamarck is wrong
Acquired physical traits don’t change DNA
But partly revived now via epigenetics (environment can alter gene expression, not DNA sequence)
⭐ Darwin & Wallace Theory of Natural Selection
Observations
More offspring produced than survive
Populations show variation
Traits are heritable
Conclusions
Individuals with advantageous heritable traits survive & reproduce more
Over many generations → adaptations accumulate
Population evolves, not individuals
⭐ Key Definitions
Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
Natural selection | Environment selects beneficial inherited traits |
Adaptation | Heritable trait that increases fitness |
Fitness | Ability to survive & reproduce |
⭐ Differences: Lamarck vs Darwin
Lamarck | Darwin/Wallace |
|---|---|
Use/disuse change body | Variation already exists |
Acquired traits inherited | Only genetic traits inherited |
Evolution purposeful | No goal → changes due to environment |
No extinction | Extinction real |
Organisms try to adapt | Nature selects traits that already exist |
✅ Evidence for Evolution
⭐ 1) Artificial Selection
Humans choose traits (dogs, crops)
Shows heritable variation can rapidly shape species
⭐ 2) Fossil Record
Older → simpler organisms
Transitional fossils show gradual change
Tiktaalik: fish → tetrapod
Horses: many toes → 1 toe, teeth change, taller
Most organisms don’t fossilize — bias toward hard structures & certain environments
⭐ 3) Comparative Anatomy
Type | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
Homology | Same origin, diff function | Human arm, whale fin, bat wing |
Analogy (homoplasy) | Same function, diff origin | Bird wing vs insect wing |
Vestigial | Remnant structures | Human tailbone, whale pelvis |
Atavism | Ancestral trait reappears | Extra horse toes, human tail |
⭐ 4) Embryology
Early embryos similar across vertebrates
Pharyngeal arches → fish gills / human ear & throat bones
Shared developmental pathways = shared ancestry
⭐ 5) Biogeography
Island species resemble nearby mainland species
Continental drift explains fossils matching separated continents
Adaptive radiation (ex: Darwin’s finches)
⭐ 6) Molecular Genetics
DNA sequences diverge over time → molecular clock
Hox genes control body plans in animals — highly conserved
Deep genetic similarity across species supports common ancestry
✅ Phylogeny & Systematics
⭐ Terms
Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
Phylogeny | Evolutionary history of species |
Taxon | Any group (species, genus, etc.) |
Clade | Ancestor + all descendants |
Root | Ancestral lineage |
Node | Common ancestor; branching point |
Sister taxa | Closest relatives |
Outgroup | Used to determine ancestral traits |
⭐ Trait Types
Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
Ancestral trait (plesiomorphy) | Original trait from ancestor |
Derived trait (apomorphy) | New trait |
Synapomorphy | Shared derived trait that defines a clade |
Autapomorphy | Unique derived trait for one lineage |
✅ Speciation Concepts
Disruptive selection increases divergence → speciation
Allopatric = geographic barrier
Sympatric = speciation without physical separation (ex: niche partitioning, polyploidy in plants)
✅ Part 3 — Genetics, Cell Theory, Chromosomes
🧬 Cell Theory
Scientist | Contribution |
|---|---|
Schleiden & Schwann | All living things made of cells; cells are basic unit |
Virchow | Cells come from pre-existing cells |
Flemming | Chromosomes visible during mitosis |
Beneden | Gametes are haploid, fertilization restores diploid |
Weismann | Germ plasm theory; heredity in gametes, not soma |
⭐ Mendel’s Work
Key conclusions
Traits controlled by heritable factors (genes)
Each individual has two alleles
Alleles segregate during meiosis
Alleles assort independently (unless linked)
Dominant vs recessive traits
⭐ Terms
Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
Allele | Variant of a gene |
Genotype | Genetic makeup |
Phenotype | Observable trait |
Homozygous | Same alleles (AA, aa) |
Heterozygous | Different alleles (Aa) |
⭐ Chromosome Theory
Sutton & Boveri: chromosomes carry genes
Behavior of chromosomes in meiosis = Mendel's laws
⭐ Morgan’s Experiments (Fruit Flies)
Discovered sex-linked traits
White-eye mutation only in males → X-linked
Showed genes on chromosomes
Linked genes deviate from independent assortment
Crossing over produces recombinants
⭐ Types of Mutations
Type | Meaning |
|---|---|
Somatic | Body cells; NOT inherited |
Germ-line | Gametes; heritable |
Point mutation | Single nucleotide change |
Chromosomal aberrations | Deletions, inversions, nondisjunction |
⭐ Nondisjunction (Calvin Bridges)
Chromosomes fail to separate in meiosis
Results: XO, XXY, XXX, etc.
Confirmed chromosomes carry heredity
⭐ Sex Determination
Y chromosome has SRY gene → testes development
Hormones influence external development
Genetics + environment = phenotype variation
Sexual development = complex; many pathways, variations