Testimony of Pedro Naranjo on the Pueblo Revolt of 1680

Declaration of Pedro Naranjo on the Pueblo Revolt of 1680

Overview of Declaration

  • Date and Context: The declaration was made on December 19, 1681, in the plaza de armas.

  • Declarant: Pedro Naranjo, an Indian prisoner and native of the pueblo of San Felipe, part of the Queres Nation.

  • Languages: He is proficient in Castilian (Spanish), his mother tongue, and the Tegua language.

  • Oath: He took an oath in the name of God, promising to tell the truth concerning his knowledge of the events.

Reasons for the Pueblo Revolt

  • Background Context: Naranjo indicates that ideas for rebellion among the Indians had been brewing under the governance of Governor Hernando Ugarte y la Concha.

    • Previous conspiracies were initiated by Indian sorcerers.

    • Seven or eight Indians were hung for conspiracy, which initially quelled unrest.

Communication of Conspiracy

  • Use of Deerskins: Messages were conveyed through deerskins adorned with imagery to signal conspiracy; these were intended to unify pueblos but failed to reach all.

  • Role of Popé: An Indian named Popé, allegedly in communication with a supernatural force, galvanized the rebellion:

    • Popé witnessed three fiery figures in an estufa (a ceremonial lodge) who instructed him about the rebellion.

    • He was directed to make a cord of maguey fiber with knots to signify waiting days until the revolt, stressing penalties for non-compliance.

Initiation of the Revolt

  • Premature Execution: Concerned about discovery, rebels enacted their plans two days early:

    • They attacked priests, women, children, and Spaniards, believing the governor had left the area.

    • Popé later commanded the inhabitants to reclaim traditional farming practices free of Spanish control.

  • New Orders to the People: Upon the initial violence, unity was mandated and anyone dissenting faced execution.

Destruction of Religious Symbols

  • Mandate to Burn Religious Items: Popé ordered the destruction of Christian symbols:

    • Images of Christ, the Virgin Mary, and other saints were to be destroyed.

    • Temples were burned, and traditional religious practices were to be abandoned.

    • Individuals were encouraged to wash away Christian sacraments in rivers, believing this would restore their prior, ancient status.

  • Rejection of Spanish God: They believed the Spanish God was inferior ("worth nothing"), equating their indigenous spiritual beliefs with a more potent authority.

  • Observance of Commands: Most complied with these orders, while a few Christians who resisted were executed.

Restoration of Indigenous Practices

  • Rebuilding: Naranjo observed the reconstruction of estufas and the adoption of masks for new rituals emphasizing a return to ancestral customs.

  • Mythical Promises: The spirits communicated promises of agricultural abundance upon the return to indigenous ways of life.

  • Physical Appearance as Loyalty Indicator: Those who maintained loyalty to the priests were to be identified by their appearance and punished accordingly.

Plans Against Possible Spanish Return

  • Readiness for Combat: The Indians resolved to fight the Spaniards if they returned,

    • A plan existed wherein demons would alert them of the Spaniards' approach, aiding in strategizing their defense.

  • Ingrained Defiance: Naranjo notes that rebellious sentiments lingered, with plans to attack Spaniards continuing behind the scenes.

Conclusion of Testimony

  • Final Thoughts: Naranjo expresses remorse over his participation in the rebellion,

    • He is now absolved, presenting his testimony as a truthfully spoken confession.

  • Age and Ratification: He states he is eighty years old, confirming the accuracy of his declaration and signing it under supervision from recognized authorities.

Witnesses and Documentation

  • Involvement of Official Parties: The declaration was executed before Antonio de Otermín and witnessed by various individuals, including interpreters and officials, which emphasizes its legitimacy as a historical document.