social psych

Social Psychology

3/6/24

groups

social psychology: the branch of psychology that studies how people think feel and behave in social situations

  • social cognition

  • social influence

social cognition

social cognition: the study of the mental processes people use to make sense out of their social environment

person perception

person perception: the mental processes we use to form judgments and draw conclusions about the characteristics and motives of others

in some type of interpersonal context

every interpersonal context has 3 key components

  • the characteristics of the individual you are attempting to size up

  • your own characteristics as the perceiver

  • the specific situation in which the process occurs

    • is it social, academic, work

follows some basic principles

  • your reactions to others are determined by your perceptions of them, not by who or what they really are

  • your goals in a particular situation determine the amount and kind of information you collect about others

  • in every situation, you evaluate people partly in terms of how you expect them to behave in that situation

    • are they following the social norms you think are appropriate

      • social norms: the rules or expectations for appropriate behavior in a particular social situation

  • your self-perception also influences how you perceive others and how you act on your own perceptions

social-categorization: the mental process of categorizing people into groups or categories based on their shared characteristics

  • not really conscious of or try to do it

implicit personality theory: a network of assumptions or beliefs about the relationships among various types of people's traits and behaviors

attribution: the mental process of inferring the causes of people’s behavior including one’s own, also refers to the explanation made for a particular behavior

  • fundamental attribution error: the tendency to attribute the behavior of others to internal personal characteristics while ignoring or underestimating the effects of external situational factors

    • common type of bias in an individualistic culture (U.S)

    • biases with attribution:

      • blaming the victim (dynamic): the tendency to blame an innocent victim of misfortune for having somehow caused the problem or for not having taken steps to avoid or prevent it

      • the just world hypothesis/phenomenon: the assumption that the world is fair and that therefore, people get what they deserve and deserve what they get

      • actor-observer discrepancy: the tendency to attribute one’s own behavior to external situational causes while attributing the behavior of others to internal personal causes especially likely to occur with regard to behaviors that lead to negative outcomes

        • a possible explanation for this we have more information about the potential causes of our own behavior than we do about the causes of other people’s behavior

      • the self-serving bias: the tendency to attribute successful outcomes of one’s own behavior to internal causes and unsuccessful outcomes to external situational causes/factors

      • self-effacing (modesty bias): we tend to blame ourselves for our failures attributing them to internal personal causes while downplaying our successes by attributing them to external situational causes

        • not normal compared to others, more common in Asian cultures (collectivist cultures)

.

3/7/24

attitude

attitude: a learned tendency to evaluate some object, person, or issue in a particular way

  • evaluations may be positive, negative, or ambivalent

3 components of attitude: cognitive component, affective component, behavioral component

  • cognitive component: your thoughts and conclusions about a given topic or object

    • ex. strongly favoring gun control

  • affective component: emotional component

    • ex. scared and upset about all of the guns

  • behavioral component: where your attitudes are reflected in your actions

    • ex. started a petition about gun control in the state

social psychologists have consistently found that people don’t always act in accordance with their attitudes

they have found that we are more likely to behave in accordance with our attitudes when:

  • our attitudes are extreme or frequently expressed

  • attitudes have been formed through direct experience

  • very knowledgeable about the subject

  • having a vested interest in the subject

    • having something to gain or lose

  • because you anticipate a favorable outcome/response from others for doing so

the effect of behavior on attitudes

The foot-in-the-door phenomenon: the tendency for people who have first agreed to a small request to comply later with a larger request

role: a set of expectations about a social position defining how those in the position ought to behave

  • set mostly by parents

Philip Zimbardo: Stanford Prison Experiment

  • It had to end after 6 days

  • Used college students

  • Study the psychological and behavioral consequences of being a prisoner and a guard

  • 3 cells

  • 15 dollars a day

  • They took a test to see if they were mentally abnormal and healthy

How can your behavior affect your attitude

cognitive dissonance: an unpleasant state of psychological tension or arousal (dissonance) that occurs when two thoughts or perceptions (cognitions) are inconsistent, typically results from the awareness that attitudes and behavior are in conflict

  • resolution: people change their attitude

  • ex. saying you won’t drink in college

3/8/24

social influence

social influence: the study of the effects of situational factors and other people on an individual's behavior

conformity: the tendency to adjust one’s behavior, attitudes, or beliefs to group norms in response to real or imagined group pressure

  • Studied: Solomon Asch, line experiment

  • factors that promote conformity:

    • facing a unanimous majority of four or five people

    • you must give your response in front of the group

    • you have not already expressed commitment to a different idea or opinion

    • you find the task to ambiguous or difficult

    • you doubt your abilities/knowledge in a situation

    • you are strongly attracted to a group and want to be a member of it

normative social influence: behavior that is motivated by the desire to gain social acceptance and approval

informational social influence: behavior that is motivated by the desire to be right

obedience: the performance of an action in response to the direct orders of an authority or a person of higher status

  • Studies: Stanley Milgram, shocking experiment

3/11/24

Milgrams experiment

  • 2/3 of Miligram’s subjects (26/40) went to the full 450-volt level, of those who defied the experimenter not one stopped before the 300-volt level

  • when he replicated it no group had as high a score as the original group ^

  • conclusions: these are some of the forces that influence the subjects to be obedient, a previously

    • well-established mental framework to obey

      • they went in ready to follow directions

    • the situation or context in which the obedience occurs

      • they believed what they were doing was contributing to research

    • the gradual repetitive escalation of the task

      • started from low volt to high

    • the experimenter's behavior and reassurance

      • telling them it was necessary to keep going and that all the responsibility was on the experimenter

    • the physical and psychological separation from the learner

      • they weren’t seeing what was happening to the other person

prejudice: a negative attitude toward people who belong to a specific social group

3/12/24

what are some of the contributing factors to prejudice occurring?:

  • stereotype: a cluster of characteristics that are associated with all members of a specific social group often including qualities that are unrelated to the objective criteria that define the group

  • in-group: a social group to which one belongs

    • the in-group bias: the tendency to judge the behavior of in-group members favorably and out-group members unfavorably

      • ethnocentrism: the belief that one's own culture or ethnic group is superior to all others and the related tendency to use one's own culture as a standard by which to judge other cultures

  • out-group: a social group to which one doesn’t belong

    • the out-group homogeneity effect: the tendency to see members of out-groups as very similar to one another

not on test but might be on APMufizer Sherif: the Robbers Cave experiment

  • summer camp, boys were randomly assigned to 2 groups, one was the eagles and one the raplors

  • competitive games, fierce rivalry developed

  • they did some hostile things

  • they wanted to create harmony, they created situations where they would both need to cooperate, they came together

  • conclusion: cooperation helped the subjects overcome their difference

Elliot Erinson:

  • conducted in elementary school that contained different racial groups

  • he used what is known as the jigsaw classroom technique

  • he brought together students in small ethnically diverse groups to work on a project

  • interdependence and cooperation can replace competition

  • conclusion: cooperation changes our tendency to categorize the out-group from those people to us people

Patricia Divine: studied that prejudice reduction at the individual level is a three-step process

  • first: individuals must decide that prejudiced responses are wrong and consciously reject prejudice and stereotyped thinking

  • second: they must internalize their non-prejudice beliefs so that those beliefs become an intrical part of their personal self-concept

  • third: individuals must learn to inhibit automatic prejudicial reactions and deliberately replace them with non-prejudiced responses that are based on their personal standards

Kitty Geneves

Altruism/helping behavior: the unselfish regard for the welfare of others

The bystander effect: the phenomenon in which the greater the number of people present the less likely each individual is to help someone in distress

  • decrease the likelihood for them to act

diffusion of responsibility: the phenomenon in which the presence of other people makes it less likely that any individual will help someone in distress because the obligation to intervene is shared among all the onlookers

  • decrease

increase the likelihood that bystanders will help

  • the feel-good, do-good effect: when you are in a good mood you are more likely to help

  • feeling guilty: when we feel bad about something we did so we try to help someone else, subconsciously righting a wrong

  • seeing others who are willing to help:

  • perceiving the other person as deserving of help

  • knowing how to help

  • a personalized relationship

    • does not mean you know them personally, like could have just made eye contact

3/13/24

social relations

aggression

aggression: any physical or verbal behavior intended to hurt or destroy

it’s the most destructive force in our social relations

frustration-aggression principle: the idea that frustration due to the blocking of an attempt to achieve some goal creates anger which can generate aggression

  • behind someone who is going less than the speed limit when you are late

aggressive behavior is learned through direct rewards and observation

conflict: a perceived incompatibility of actions goals or ideas

  • most destructive process that is caused by conflict is called social traps

    • social traps: situations in which conflicting parties by each rationally perusing their self-interest become caught in mutually destructive behavior

      • two girls fighting over the same boy

attraction: in friends, in family, in significant other, in coworkers

several factors that contribute to out liking of one another

  • proximity: nearness

    • the closer you are physically to someone, the more likely you are to like them

    • will like the neighbors closer to you

  • mere exposure effect: the phenomenon that repeated exposure to novel stimuli increases our liking of them

    • seeing them a lot, the more you are around them the more you grow to like them

  • physical attractiveness:

  • similarity: things you need to have in common

two kinds of love:

passionate love: an aroused state of intense positive absorption in another, usually present at the beginning of a love relationship

  • they see their name pop up on the phone or see them in person and you get the butterflies, when they compliment them

companionate love: the deep affectionate attachment we feel for those with whom our lives are intertwined

  • will put yourself in harm's way for them, may go away when you have children

peacemaking:

  • superordinate goals: shared goals that override differences among people and require their cooperation

  • third part mediator to help facilitate communications

  • GRIT: graduated, and reciprocated initiatives, tension reduction, a strategy designed to decrease international tensions

    • the two sides express their mutual interest in getting along, one offers a concession hoping the other side will reciprocate

group influence: individual behavior in the presence of others

  • groups can benefit us + and -

  • social facilitation: improved performance of tasks in the presence of others this occurs with well-learned tasks but not with tasks that are difficult or not yet mastered

    • things that you do well, you are likely to do better in front of an audience

    • things you don’t do well, you are likely to mess up

  • social loafing: the tendency for people in a group to exert less effort when pulling their efforts toward attaining a common goal than when individually accountable

  • deindividuation: the loss of self-awareness and self-restraint occurring in group situations that foster arousal and anonymity

    • sporting events, rock concerts, at a dance, or in worship

  • group polarization: the enhancement of a group's prevailing attitudes through discussion within the group

    • group with a shared interest

  • groupthink: the mode of thinking that occurs when the desire for harmony in a decision-making group overrides a realistic appraisal of alternatives

    • wanting to eat somewhere else in the group but going along because most people want to go