2004 Erik Witvrouw - Stretching and Injury Prevention An Obscure Relati [retrieved_2025-03-18]
Stretching and Injury Prevention
Abstract
Increasing muscle-tendon unit flexibility is believed to improve performance and reduce injuries.
Contradictory evidence exists: some studies suggest stretching prevents injuries, while others show no effect.
No scientifically established guidelines for stretching exercises exist.
Recommendations on stretching are often based on misconceptions and conflicting research findings.
The type of sport influences the relationship between stretching and injury risk.
1. Working Mechanism of the Musculotendinous Unit during Movement
Muscle-tendon systems generate force in two main ways:
As an elastic spring in stretch-shortening cycles (SSCs), particularly in jumping.
Converting metabolic energy into mechanical work in concentric contractions.
A stiffer muscle-tendon unit performs better in isometric and concentric actions.
Musculotendinous stiffness is not significantly related to eccentric performance.
2. How Can Stretching Reduce the Risk of Injuries?
Compliance of the muscle-tendon unit is crucial for reducing injury risk.
Stiffer muscle-tendon systems quickly transfer force, enhancing performance.
Increased muscular stiffness could benefit sports requiring quick energy transfer.
Stretching prior to high-intensity SSC activities enhances energy storage and performance.
3. Stretching and Injuries in Sports with High Stretch-Shortening Cycle (SSC) Movements
Examples: sports like soccer and football require compliant muscle-tendon units for effective energy storage.
Insufficient compliance leads to meeting energy demands that surpass muscle-tendon capacity, risking injury.
Studies indicate stretching increases tendon viscosity and compliance, potentially preventing injuries in SSC-dominant sports.
4. Stretching and Injuries in Sports with No or Low SSC Movements
Examples: jogging, cycling, and swimming rely on active muscle work rather than elastic energy storage.
Lower compliance in tendons could be advantageous in these sports, which do not demand high energy absorption.
Evidence shows stretching does not significantly reduce injury rates in low SSC sports, contrary to common beliefs.
5. Conclusions
Stretching remains a common practice among coaches, yet scientific findings about its effectiveness are mixed.
Contradictions in evidence may stem from differing sports activity types.
Stiffer tendons may benefit performance in explosive sports, while flexibility may be critical in sports with high SSC.
More research needed to clarify the role of stretching in injury prevention across various sports types.