CRAMMING

Metaethics

  • Definition: The study of the nature, foundation, and meaning of moral values, principles, and judgments.


Moral Dilemma

Example Situation

  • After a party, you find your friend's lost wallet containing $100.

  • You believe you can keep it without her knowing, despite needing the money for a car payment.

  • Internal conflict arises between the desire to keep the money and the moral obligation to return the wallet.


Reactions to Moral Considerations

  • Moral considerations present themselves as objective realities.

  • Objectivism/Moral Realism/Ethical Realism: There exist moral facts that determine true or false moral judgments.

    • These facts are independent of personal attitudes and socio-cultural contexts.

    • They are akin to states of affairs in the world that validate moral propositions.

  • Key Question: Are moral judgments genuinely objective?


Metaphysical Concerns

  • Rightness and Goodness: These properties would need to be distinct from scientific or logical properties, yet still knowable.

  • Such properties may be mysterious and would need to compel action through intuition or perception.

  • Knowledge Worry: How can we attain moral knowledge if these properties are so elusive?


Motivational Aspects

  • What drives you to return the wallet?

    • Might stem from a desire or a particular thought.

  • Critics argue that moral obligations thinly disguise personal desires.


Disagreement in Moral Codes

  • Moral disagreements question the objectivity of morality.

  • Diversity in moral views may suggest a lack of objective moral truths.

  • Peer disagreements about moral issues could be explained by subjective rather than objective bases for morality.


Responses to Moral Developments

Theories of Moral Engagement

  • Moral Nihilism: Asserts that there are no moral facts.

  • Cultural Relativism: Defines morality based on a society's guiding principles.

  • Subjectivism: Establishes moral approval based on individual beliefs or commitments.


Challenges Within These Theories

Moral Nihilism

  • Skeptical stance; implies morality is non-existent.

Subjectivism and Relativism Concerns

  • They render some unjust actions permissible, leading to moral catastrophes.

  • Genuine moral disagreements exist, countering the idea that all perspectives are valid.

  • Challenges to moral progress and contradicting moral statements.


Ideal Observer Concept

  • Modified Subjectivist View: Proposes moral acts are right if approved by an ideal observer who is fully informed and rational.

  • However, this shifts concerns to the mysterious nature of what constitutes 'ideal' approval.


Objectivist Responses to Concerns

  1. Impersonal Practical Reasoning: The structure of reasoning guides moral judgments, not esoteric properties.

  2. Conflict of Belief and Desire: Explains motivation through duty.

  3. Uniformity Across Cultures: Suggests shared moral principles rather than disagreement.

  4. Epistemic Efficacy: Acknowledges varying evidence levels among moral philosophers.


Naturalism vs. Non-naturalism

Naturalistic Approach

  • Moral facts aligned with natural properties.

Non-naturalistic Perspective

  • Moral facts as separate from physical verifiability (e.g., Divine Command Theory).


Moral Nihilism and Error Theory

  • Error Theory: Claims that:

    1. No moral features exist.

    2. Therefore, no moral judgments stand as true.

    3. Moral judgments fail to accurately represent moral qualities.

    4. Originated as a solution to social coordination problems.


Problems Plaguing Error Theory

  • If Error Theory is correct, then humanity is uniformly incorrect about morality.


Expressivism Overview

  • Accepts the first three points of Error Theory but disputes the existence of moral descriptions.

  • Moral statements reflect emotional expressions or imperatives rather than facts.

  • Moral judgments are neither true nor false.


Challenges for Expressivism

  • Difficulties arise during moral disagreements.

  • How to handle cases with clear moral assertions from those with differing views?


Metaethics Discussion

  • Encourage reflection on the various theories discussed.

  • Form opinions on these theories and potential responses to their shortcomings.


Utilitarianism

Basic Principles

  • Actions are correct if they promote happiness; incorrect if they produce unhappiness.

    • Happiness defined as pleasure and absence of pain.

  • An act is right if it maximizes utility or overall well-being.

Features of Utilitarianism

  • Optimific Actions: Maximize overall good in any given circumstance.

  • Value of Happiness: Considered the sole intrinsic good; thus, hedonistic in nature.

  • Impartiality: Treat all interests equally; agent-neutrality in moral assessments.

Issues with Utilitarianism

  • Intention does not impact the moral value of an action; only consequences matter.


Act vs. Rule Utilitarianism

Act Utilitarianism (Act-U)

  • Rightness depends on utility of specific consequences.

Rule Utilitarianism (Rule-U)

  • Rightness is determined by adherence to beneficial rules rather than individual acts.

Issues with Act-U

  • Potential for moral disasters; problematic implications for unique moral obligations.

  • Calculational challenges hinder practical ethical guidance.

  • Concerns of hedonism; it might fail to account for broader human aspirations.


Kantian Deontology

Core Idea

  • Categorical Imperative (CI): Unconditional command to act morally.

Formulations of CI

  1. Universalizability: Actions should be applicable universally.

  2. Humanity Formula: Treat individuals as ends, never merely means.

  3. Kingdom of Ends: Everyone's goals coexist harmoniously.


Standard of Right Action in Kantianism

  • An action is right if consistent with duty as defined by the CI (e.g., don’t lie, don’t cheat).


Strengths of Kantianism

  • Effectively avoids pitfalls found in Act-U.

  • Preserves promises and meaningful obligations in personal relationships.


Problems with Kantianism

Practical Dilemmas

  • Murderer at the Door: The dilemma of lying to protect an innocent life poses serious ethical objections.

  • Scope of Moral Community: Non-human rights issues emerge when considering persons versus beings lacking rationality.


Virtue Ethics

Concept of Flourishing

  • Human flourishing is not just enjoyment but involves sociality and reason to achieve actualization.

Understanding Virtues and Vices

  • Virtues: Traits necessary for flourishing (e.g., courage, justice).

  • Vices: Traits that inhibit flourishing (e.g., cowardice).


Components of Virtue

  1. Epistemic: Knowledge of moral truths.

  2. Affective: Emotional responses aligned with virtue.

  3. Motivational: Drive to act rightly based on proper reasons.


Standard of Right Action in Virtue Ethics

  • An action is deemed right if it reflects what a virtuous person would do under similar circumstances.


Challenges for Virtue Ethics

  • Action guidance concerns arise; unclear how virtues directly dictate moral actions.

  • Example scenario: Assessing an addict's decision to pursue rehabilitation.


Other Ethical Theories

  • Rossian Deontology: Right action involves adhering to prima facie duties.

  • Contractualism: Wrong actions are those that rational individuals could not collectively endorse.