The role of the witness
What is a witness?
Eyewitness: Someone who saw an event happen
Witness: Have knowledge of something form knowledge or experience
Members of public: Eyewitness, Victims
Professionals: Professional based witness, Expert witness
Members of the public
Anyone could be a witness
Some are considered vulnerable and/or intimidated
Vulnerable:
Any child under 18
Mental disorder
Learning impairment
Physical impairment
Intimidated
Quality of evidence is likely to be diminished by fear/distress
Can be broad by exampled include: Sexual offences, weapon involved crimes, Racially motivated crimes, repeat, elderly
Witnesses in court
The number/type of witness called to give evidence in a trial differs depending on the case, as does the time spent in the witness box
Factors affecting the time spent, number and type of witness in court:
Evidence contested or not? (Sec.9 criminal justice act 1967)
Number of defendants
Vilume vs serious/major crime
What the witness says in court
Giving evidence
Examination and cross-contamination
Range of options for giving evidence
In open court
In court, but behind a screen
Via video link
Show pre-recorded interview
Section 28 — Logistical challenges
Challenge of getting case organised quickly
Continuity of counsel
Centralised booking system issues
Technical issues
Special measures — Effective in supporting witnesses but…
Gaps in provisions:
Special measures not be assessed for early enough
Information about vulnerable/ intimidated status not being shared
Special measures not being available or provided for on the day
Professional witness
Someone who is involved in the case due to their occupation
Only stating facts, not providing opinions
Expert witness
Someone who is involved in the case due to their occupation
Need to state opinions to interpret the facts for the jury to understand
The fallibility of memory and how this impacts on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony
Our memory is not 100% accurate
Causes of faulty eyewitness testimony
Eyewitness identification is a joint product of:
Inherent human processes
Methods used to obtain information from eyewitnesses
Issues affecting human memory
How long were you able to observe them?
How far away from them were you?
How clearly could you see them?
Was the person familiar?
Was there anything that made you notice them?
How much time has passed since you saw them?
Effectiveness of human memory
Amount of time under observation
Distance from the eyewitness to the person/incident
Visibility — including time of day, street lighting etc
Obstructions — was there anything obstructing the view?
Known or seen before — did the witness knoe, or had they seen the suspect before?
Any reason to remember — was there something specific that made it more memorable
Time lapse — how long since the witness last saw the suspect
Errors or material discrepancies
Memory storage and retrieval
The acquisition of information
What information comes into memory?
What information is attended to?
The retention of information
What is learned or encoded?
At what depth is it encoded?
How well is it encoded?
The retrieval of previously learned information
Can we get it back?
Is it the same as when we stored it?
The retention of information
Our memory is less accurate over time
Particularly relevant for historical cases
How information is retrieved
Interviewing/Questioning methodologies:
Different types of questions produce different types of answers
Leading questions have a tendency to produce erroneous info (Loftus & Palmer, 1974)
“Did you see the…? / Did you see a…?”
All interviewees are susceptible to suggestion
Especially as police officers may be seen as authoritative figure who is an expert in criminal investigations
Police officers are trained in interviewing techniques that focus on: open questions and an information gathering approach
PART 2 OF LECTURE — Expert witness
Introduction
Associate Professor, School of Criminology
Hate and Extremism – religiously motivated, far-right/extreme right wing, policies/ legislation
Modules: Terrorism & Understanding Extremism (UG); Responding to Terrorism (PG)
Submitted oral and written evidence to various parliamentary committees, select committees and parliamentary groups (e.g. House of Lords Select Committee on Religious Offences, the All Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia, All Party Parliamentary Group on Universities, Home Affairs Select Committee on Hate Crimes, and the Commission on Islam, Participation and Public Life)
Independent member of West Midlands Counter Terrorism Advisory Group & formerly, Cross-Government Working Group on Anti-Muslim Hate
Consulted by various individual politicians
What is an expert witness?
Crown Prosecution service
An ‘expert witness’ is someone able “to furnish the court with information which is likely to be outside the experience and the knowledge of a judge or jury”
“…to help the court to achieve the overriding objective by giving opinion which is objective and unbiased, in relation to matters within their expertise”
Expert evidence will be of assistance to the court
The expert has relevant expertise
The expert is impartial
The expert's evidence is reliable
Pre-trial
Terms of Reference
Contract
Evidence – case specific materials/resources (primarily digital)
Official Secrets Act
Letter of Instruction
Remit of expertise
Scope and Standard of report (inc. what not to include)
Timeframe for delivery
The cases
Violence
Nation socialism
Symbology
Racial/Cultural Nationalism (e.g. Racism, Antisemitism, Islamophobia etc)
History of the Far-Right and/or Extreme Right-Wing
Relevance to Terrorism Inspired by the Extreme Right-Wing
Encouragement and/or Glorification of Terrorism
Trial
The witness stand
Retention of information
Effectiveness of Human Memory
Questions - prosecution
Questions - defence