Study Notes on Informative and Persuasive Speaking
Chapter Overview: Informative and Persuasive Speaking
Sections:
11.1: Informative Speeches
11.2: Persuasive Speaking
11.3: Persuasive Reasoning and Fallacies
11.4: Persuasive Strategies
11.1: Informative Speeches
Objectives
Identify common topic categories for informative speeches.
Identify strategies for researching and supporting informative speeches.
Explain the different methods of informing.
Employ strategies for effective informative speaking, including avoiding persuasion, avoiding information overload, and engaging the audience.
Importance of Informative Speaking
Informative speaking is the most common form of public speaking, found in reports, lectures, training seminars, and demonstrations.
While it may not seem as exciting as persuasive speaking, it is crucial and widely used in various contexts such as consulting and training fields.
College alumni stress the importance of informative speaking skills in professional environments (Verderber, 1991).
Creating an Informative Speech
Informative speaking aims to teach using objective information.
Historically, public speaking was primarily argumentative; however, with the democratization of information and the complexity of knowledge, there has been a shift to more informative instruction.
Educators now aim to teach background information without relying solely on debate and argumentative methods.
Choosing an Informative Speech Topic
Topics can engage and educate based on the level of speaking: formal, vocational, and impromptu.
Categories for Speeches:
Objects
People
Events
Processes
Concepts
Issues
Examples of Topics:
Objects: Biomass gasifier, Tarot cards.
People: Al Gore, Jennifer Lopez.
Events: Earth Day, Pi Day.
Processes: Converting wind to energy.
Concepts: Sustainability.
Issues: Nuclear safety.
Researching Informative Speech Topics
Effective research is fundamental for informative speaking.
Seek credible, balanced, and objective sources (periodicals, books, newspapers, websites).
Engage the audience by choosing novel and unexpected information.
Example: A speech on the history of coupons highlighted surprising facts, increasing audience engagement.
Engaging the Audience
Avoid information overload; focus on clarity and comprehension.
Provide practical takeaways that both engage and inform the audience, leaving them with memorable insights.
Organize informative speeches using topical, chronological, or spatial patterns:
Topical: Logical subdivisions of the main topic.
Chronological: Development or processes in time sequence.
Spatial: Layouts or characteristics of a specific place or concept.
Methods of Informing
Informing through Definition
Define concepts clearly using:
Synonyms/Acronyms: Help clarify meaning.
Use/Function: Explain what something does.
Examples: Illustrate larger concepts.
Etymology: Historical origins of terms (e.g., meanings and roots of words).
Informing through Description
Create vivid verbal pictures to engage the audience’s senses, enhancing understanding and interest.
Example: Invoking sensory reactions when describing objects.
Informing through Demonstration
Combining verbal and physical directives enables audience understanding of how to do something.
Emphasize practice, clarity, and visual aids during demonstrations to ensure effectiveness.
Informing through Explanation
Share reasons for phenomena or processes; break complex topics into manageable parts for understanding.
Effective Informative Speaking Strategies
Avoiding Persuasion
Maintain objectivity; focus solely on informing without swaying views or opinions.
Avoiding Information Overload
Keep information digestible; suggest spending 30% of your speech on new material and 70% on reengaging or summarizing that information.
Engaging Your Audience
Create content that is relevant and interesting based on the audience’s prior knowledge.
Summary
Effective informative speaking requires balancing the presentation of novel content with audience engagement strategies while avoiding persuasive techniques and information overload.
11.2: Persuasive Speaking
Objectives
Explain how claims, evidence, and warrants function to create an argument.
Identify strategies for choosing a persuasive speech topic.
Identify strategies for adapting a persuasive speech.
Distinguish among propositions of fact, value, and policy.
Choose an appropriate organizational pattern for a persuasive speech.
Foundation of Persuasion
Persuasive speaking aims to influence beliefs, attitudes, values, or behaviors.
An argument consists of:
Claim: Central assertion.
Evidence: Supporting data or examples.
Warrant: Justification linking claim and evidence.
Example of Argument Structure
Claim: “There should be a national law against texting while driving.”
Evidence: “Research shows a crash risk of 23 times worse than driving without distraction.”
Warrant: The cited research comes from a credible source, adding legitimacy to the claim.
Choosing a Persuasive Speech Topic
Criteria for Topic Selection
Current relevance and controversy.
Significant societal implications.
Passionate personal interest.
Topics should not be inflammatory but rather meaningful.
Thesis Statement Development
Articulate arguments clearly; counter arguments should be considered for persuasive strength.
Adapting Persuasive Messages
Audience Analysis
Engage audiences at differing levels of agreement and understanding.
Strategies include intensifying agreement for supportive audiences and providing supporting background information for neutral audiences.
Propositions in Persuasive Speeches
Proposition of Fact: Asserting something is true or false.
Proposition of Value: Claiming something is good/bad or right/wrong.
Proposition of Policy: Advocating for specific actions or policies.
Organizational Patterns for Persuasive Speech
Patterns Include:
Problem-Solution: Identifying a problem followed by proposed solutions.
Cause-Effect: Examining causal relationships.
Monroe’s Motivated Sequence: Structured for influencing audience action through clear steps.
11.3: Persuasive Reasoning and Fallacies
Objectives
Define inductive, deductive, and causal reasoning.
Evaluate the quality of reasoning.
Identify common fallacies in reasoning.
Reasoning Types
Inductive Reasoning
Generalizing based on specific examples (e.g., evidence leads to broader conclusions).
Weakness: hasty generalizations may arise if examples are insufficient.
Deductive Reasoning
Drawing specific conclusions from general principles (e.g., syllogisms). Valid deductions require all premises to be true.
Causal Reasoning
Establishing relationships between causes and effects. Care must be taken to avoid over-simplification of complex issues.
Common Fallacies of Reasoning
Hasty Generalization: Insufficient examples lead to broad claims.
False Analogy: Comparing two things that are not similar enough.
False Cause: Incorrectly attributing cause and effect.
Ad Hominem: Attacking the person instead of the argument.
Slippery Slope: Assuming direct consequences from a single action without evidence.
Red Herring: Distracting from the main issue with irrelevant information.
11.4: Persuasive Strategies
Objectives
Identify common persuasive strategies.
Explain how ethos, logos, and pathos are utilized in speeches.
Discuss cognitive dissonance and its role in persuasion.
Persuasive Strategies Overview
Ethos: Building speaker credibility through competence, trustworthiness, and dynamism.
Logos: Logical reasoning and factual support are crucial for establishing a rational basis for claims.
Pathos: Leveraging emotional appeals to engage and motivate audiences.
Cognitive Dissonance
Employing discomfort from contradictory beliefs to persuade audiences toward change.
Appeals to Needs
Tapping into fundamental human needs (safety, social connection, self-esteem) to motivate audience action.
Summary
Persuasive speaking employs various strategies centered on ethical consideration of credibility, logical reasoning, and emotional engagement while effectively using cognitive dissonance and appeals to human needs to enhance persuasion.