Biomass Distribution on Earth
Introduction to Biomass Distribution on Earth
Authors and Institutions:
Yinon M. Bar-On, Rob Phillips, Ron Milo
Affiliated Departments:
Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
California Institute of Technology, USA
Background:
Understanding biomass (the living matter on Earth) is essential for studying biosphere structure and dynamics.
A quantitative comparison of biomass among different taxa is currently lacking.
Objective:
Assemble a comprehensive census of the biomass composition of the biosphere, estimated at approximately 550 Gt C (gigatons of carbon).
Key Findings
Distribution Among Major Taxa:
Plants: ≈450 Gt C (dominant kingdom, primarily terrestrial).
Animals: ≈2 Gt C (mainly marine).
Bacteria: ≈70 Gt C (predominantly deep subsurface).
Archaea: ≈7 Gt C (also mainly located in deep subsurface environments).
Terrestrial Biomass: Two orders of magnitude higher than marine biomass.
Total marine biota estimated at ≈6 Gt C, double previous estimates.
Global marine biomass pyramids show more consumers than producers.
Human Biomass Impact:
Human biomass (≈0.06 Gt C) exceeds that of all wild mammals combined.
Historical impact of humanity analyzed through biomass data of mammals, fish, and plants.
Historical Context and Research Foundation
Importance of Quantifying Biomass:
Essential for biosequestered carbon calculations and modeling global biogeochemical cycles.
Previous Studies:
Earlier estimates primarily focused on plants.
Prokaryotic biomass highlighted in Whitman et al. (1998) as a major component.
Recent technological advances (e.g., next-gen sequencing, remote sensing) allow for improved biomass quantification.
Comparison to Older Efforts:
Whittaker and Likens (1970s) provided early estimates that are now considered outdated; lacked comprehensive data on prokaryotes.
Smil (2013) contributed a section on biomass in a broader book that remains less integrated.
Methods and Data Collection
Biomass Data Estimation:
Analysis based on hundreds of studies with updated estimates for multiple taxa.
Ongoing sampling campaigns (e.g., Tara Oceans, National Ecological Observatory Network) are essential for current assessments.
Mathematical and Statistical Techniques:
Estimates reported in Gt C, independent of water content.
Conversion factors introduced (1 Gt C = 10^15 g of carbon).
Data Visualization:
Figure representations (Voronoi diagrams) used to illustrate biomass distributions across taxa.
Biomass Estimates Summary
Total Biomass Composition:
Plants: 450 Gt C, 80% of total
Bacteria: 70 Gt C, 15% of total
Fungi: 12 Gt C
Archaea: 7 Gt C
Protists: 4 Gt C
Animals: 2 Gt C
Viruses: 0.2 Gt C
Aboveground vs. Belowground Biomass:
Aboveground: ≈320 Gt C (≈60% of global biomass).
Belowground: mainly plant roots (≈130 Gt C) and soil microbes (≈100 Gt C).
Uncertainties in Biomass Estimates
Variability:
Estimates of bacteria are uncertain, yet they constitute ≈15% of total biomass.
Fungi are less influential than anticipated compared to their biodiversity presence.
Uncertainties arise from differences in measurement methodologies and data sources.
Human Impact on Biomass
Increase in Human and Livestock Biomass:
Human and livestock biomass surpasses that of wild fauna significantly.
Historical Consequences:
Involvement in Quaternary Megafauna Extinction reduced the mass of land mammals dramatically.
Current wild land mammal biomass is ≈0.003 Gt C, significantly lower than pre-human estimates.
Comparative Analysis of Biomass Between Environments
Terrestrial vs. Marine:
Land biomass ≈470 Gt C, two orders higher than marine biomass at ≈6 Gt C.
Primary productivity is similar across both environments, despite differences in biomass.
Majority of animal biomass in marine environments, with microorganisms prevalent in depth.
Biomass by Trophic Levels
Trophic Modes:
Terrestrial primary producers have greater biomass than consumers.
Marine environments exhibit inverted biomass pyramids, where consumer biomass exceeds that of producers.
Observations on biomasses of planktonic communities further indicate this trend.
Gaps in Current Knowledge and Future Directions
Need for Further Research:
Emphasis on diverse environmental sampling to enhance understanding of biomass distribution.
Potential improvements to estimates of prokaryotic biomass and other microscopic taxa.
Consideration of the role of parasites in overall biomass assessment.
Unified Global View:
The study aims to disseminate knowledge and understanding of biomass composition for researchers and students alike.