Study Notes on Social Competence Treatment After TBI Research
Original Research on Social Competence Treatment After Traumatic Brain Injury
Authors and Affiliations
Cynthia Harrison-Felix, PhD
Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO
Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Data and Statistical Center, Englewood, CO
Jody K. Newman, MA, CCC-SLP
Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO
Lenore Hawley, MSSW, LCSW, CBIST
Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO
Clare Morey, MA, CCC-SLP
Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO
Jessica M. Ketchum, PhD
Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO
William C. Walker, MD
Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Kathleen R. Bell, MD
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Scott R. Millis, PhD, ABPP-CN
Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan, Detroit, MI
Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
Cynthia Braden, MA, CCC-SLP
Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO
James Malec, PhD, ABPP-CN
Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
Flora M. Hammond, MD
Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN
C.B. Eagye, MS
Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO
Laura Howe, JD, PhD
Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO
Current affiliation for Bell
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Abstract
Objective
Goal: Evaluate the effectiveness of a replicable group treatment program for improving social competence after TBI.
Design
Type: Multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Methods Compared:
Group Interactive Treatment (GIST): 13 weekly group sessions of 1.5 hours each with structured, facilitated interactions.
Alternative Treatment (AT): 13 traditional classroom lectures with supplemental individual sessions.
Setting
Conducted in community and veteran rehabilitation centers.
Participants
Eligibility: 179 civilian, military, and veteran adults with TBI, at least 6 months post-injury.
Interventions
GIST: Focus on social competence through interaction.
AT: Same curriculum without facilitated group dynamics.
Main Outcome Measures
Primary: Profile of Pragmatic Impairment in Communication (PPIC).
Secondary: LaTrobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ), Goal Attainment Scale (GAS), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-C (PCL-C), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Scale of Perceived Social Self-Efficacy (PSSE).
Results
Goals were achieved and maintained across both treatment methods. Significant improvements noted in:
PPIC (primary outcome) and LCQ, BSI (secondary outcomes) were immediate but did not differ significantly between groups.
Improvements in PSSE and PCL-C were comparable.
Conclusions
Both treatments improved social competence skills for individuals with TBI, with no superior effectiveness of the GIST method demonstrated.
Introduction
Definition of Social Competence
Social Competence: Cognitive, emotional, and communication skills for successful interaction in various situations.
Importance
Impairments in social competence are prevalent post-TBI, serving as barriers to reintegration into society.
Factors Affecting Social Competence Post-TBI
Factors include extent of neurological injury, preinjury functioning, psychological reaction, social context, coexisting pain, and fatigue.
Consequences
Major aspects influencing interpersonal relationships and employment, leading to isolation, difficulty adapting to social situations, and misunderstanding social cues.
Impairments noted in conversation initiation, focus during interactions, conflict resolution, etc.
Background
Historical Treatment Approaches
Historically, social skills have been promoted in group settings emphasizing feedback and interaction.
Issues specifically within military TBI population highlighted as they face unique reintegration challenges.
Treatment Challenges
A lack of consensus on treatment methodology for social competence post-TBI and few evidence-based programs exist.
GIST was developed as structured cognitive behavioral group intervention emphasizing interactive feedback.
Methods
Design Overview
Trial Structure: 2-arm multicenter randomized controlled trial, with randomized participants across multiple sites.
Participant Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: History of TBI, >=6 months post-injury, >18 years old, English-speaking, and demonstrating social competence difficulties.
Exclusion Criteria: Inability to communicate verbally, concurrent participation in other interventions, etc.
Measurement Instruments
Primary Outcome Measure: PPIC (objective behavioral rating of communication).
Self-Report Instruments: LCQ, PSSE, and functional outcome measures via GAS.
Emotional Well-being: Measured by SWLS, PCL-C, and BSI.
Intervention Structure
GIST Program
Duration: 13 weeks of interactive format.
Topics Covered: Self-assessment, goal setting, conversation strategies, social problem solving, and positive self-talk.
Implementation: Two therapists per group, incorporation of group feedback, and practice in real-life situations.
Alternative Treatment Approach
Similar content delivered in a non-interactive classroom setup; focus on individual tasks rather than group dynamics.
Statistical Analysis
Sample Size Calculation
A power analysis suggested a required sample size of 192 participants for robust findings.
Analysis Techniques
Mixed-effects models employed to evaluate changes in outcomes over time, accounting for treatment arm, time, and covariates.
Results
Statistical Findings
Improvements were noted in several outcome measures, including measurable changes in PPIC, LCQ, BSI, and PCL-C.
Goal Attainment
High rates of goal attainment reported across both groups, suggesting treatment efficacy.
Discussion
Summary of Findings
While both GIST and AT improved social competence skills, GIST did not demonstrate greater effectiveness than AT.
Implications for Treatment
Findings indicate a potential need for booster sessions post-intervention.
Limitations of the Study
The reliance on self-reported measures, the heterogeneity of TBI severity, and the overlap in curriculum between GIST and AT may impose challenges in accurately assessing treatment effectiveness.
Recommendations for Future Research
Future studies should explore responses to treatment in relation to individual characteristics and investigate therapist training methods for group interventions.
Conclusion
The study underscores that while group interactive format did not confer superiority in treatment delivery, significant improvements can still be realized from both interactive and non-interactive approaches to social competence training.
Keywords: Brain injuries; Rehabilitation; Social skills; Treatment
Acknowledgments: Special thanks to study assistants.
Correspondence: For further inquiries contact Lenore Hawley at lhawley@craighospital.org.