Right realism view
Right realism emerged in the 1970s and 80s and heavily influenced by conservative thinkers and politicians like Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. See crime as a real problem that destroys communities, and reject the idea that deeper structural causes (poverty) are the main reasons for crime.
Beliefs of right realism
Biological differences- (Wilson and Herrnstein)
Some individuals are more predisposed to commit crime due to personality traits like aggression, low impulse control or risk taking
Combine biological factors with poor socialisation as an explanation
Criticisms- Seen as deterministic and potentially discriminatory
Inadequate socialisation/ underclass (Charles Murray)
The underclass (Welfare dependent) fail to properly socialise children
Rise in single-parent (especially fatherless families) is blamed
Lack of a farther figure= lack of discipline, leading to anti-social behaviour
Criticisms- Stereotypes the poor; overemphasises on single mothers
Rational choice theory (Clarke)
Criminals are rational actors who weigh up the risks and rewards
If the rewards outweigh the risks they choose to commit crime
Crime increases when the perceived costs (like getting caught) are low
Implication- Increase surveillance and punishment to deter crime
Right realist solutions to crime
Target Hardening- (CCTV, locks, security)
Make it more difficult to commit crime
Linked to situational crime prevention
Zero tolerance policing (Wilson and Kelling: ‘Broken windows’ theory)
Small signs of disorder (Graffiti, vandalism) lead to more serious crime
Police must crack down on all crime to maintain order
Stronger social control
Encourage tighter communities, tougher sanctions and more responsible parenting
Criticisms of Right realism
ignores structural causes (poverty, inequality, racism)
Over focus on petty crime; ignores white collar and corporate crime
Exaggerates rationality- Many crimes are impulsive or driven by emotion
Zero tolerance can lead to discrimination and over-policing of minor offences