Ch. 3 Intrapersonal Communication- Reading Notes
3.1 Who Are You?
Key Concepts
Self-concept: How you see and define yourself
Self-esteem: How you evaluate your abilities and limitations
Both strongly influence how we communicate with others
Self-Concept
Defined as a person’s beliefs about who they are (traits, qualities, identity)
Includes both positive and negative attributes
Research shows society values traits like:
Positive: honest, trustworthy, kind, respectful
Negative: abusive, untrustworthy, cruel
Attribute values change over time, but honesty and trust remain important
Carl Rogers’ Three Parts of Self-Concept
1. Self-Image
How you see yourself
Based on traits you believe you have
Usually includes a mix of positive and negative qualities
One negative trait can sometimes overshadow many positives
2. Self-Worth
How much value you place on yourself
Often (unhealthily) based on:
Appearance
Money
Grades
Career
Social media validation
Healthier self-worth comes from internal values, not external approval
Ways to improve self-worth:
Stop trying to please everyone
Control how you feel about yourself
Base value on internal standards, not others’ opinions
3. Ideal-Self
The person you want to be
Shaped by culture, expectations, and life experiences
Often unrealistic and constantly changing
Problems arise when ideal-self is too far from real-self
Congruence vs. Incongruence
Congruent: Self-image, self-worth, and ideal-self overlap
→ healthier self-concept, higher chance of self-actualizationIncongruent: Little or no overlap
→ imbalance, lower well-being, communication difficulties
The Looking-Glass Self (Charles Horton Cooley)
We develop our self-image based on how we think others see us
Three steps:
Imagine how we appear to others
Imagine how others judge us
Feel pride or shame based on that judgment
These judgments may not be accurate—but they still shape behavior
We adjust how we act to gain approval from people we value
Self-Esteem
Definition
A subjective evaluation of your abilities and limitations
Based on feelings and opinions—not facts
Key Points
People constantly evaluate themselves
Impostor syndrome is common and not evidence-based
High achievement does not guarantee high self-esteem
Abilities
Can be natural (talent) or learned (skills)
Skills require practice and successful completion
Knowing how to do something ≠ being able to do it well
Limitations
Everyone has limits (physical, mental, situational)
Important distinction:
Limits you can’t change
Limits you can improve
Self-esteem depends on how you interpret your limitations
Self-Esteem and Communication
Relationship is reciprocal
Communication affects self-esteem
Self-esteem affects communication
Interpersonal interactions are a major influence on self-esteem
Mindfulness and Self-Esteem
Mindfulness improves self-esteem by:
Reducing self-judgment
Staying present
Letting negative thoughts pass
Observing thoughts without reacting
Self-Compassion (Kristin Neff)
An alternative to focusing only on self-esteem
Less comparison, more acceptance
Three Components
Self-Kindness – treat yourself with care, not harsh criticism
Common Humanity – suffering and mistakes are part of being human
Mindfulness – acknowledge pain without over-identifying with it
“Don’t Feed the Vulture”
Vulture statements = negative self-talk
These thoughts grow when repeatedly reinforced
Examples:
“I’m a failure”
“I can’t do anything right”
Challenging vulture thoughts:
Reality testing
Finding alternative explanations
Putting things in perspective
Goal-directed thinking
Research Spotlight
Social communication competence is linked to higher self-compassion
Being effective and confident in communication helps people treat themselves more kindly
3.2 Personality & Perception in Intrapersonal Communication
Key Ideas
Personality and perception shape how we think, feel, and communicate.
Both are influenced by genetics (nature) and environment (nurture).
Personality affects communication styles, emotional responses, and relationships.
Personality
Personality: A unique combination of traits, behaviors, emotions, and mental patterns.
Daly’s categories of personality:
Cognitive dispositions
Personal-social dispositions
Communicative dispositions
Relational dispositions
Nature vs. Nurture
Ongoing debate: Are traits shaped by genetics or environment?
Twin studies (Minnesota Twins) show strong genetic influence.
Communication traits influenced by genetics include:
Aggressiveness
Social anxiety
Willingness to communicate
Communication competence
Key takeaway: Genetics matter, but environment shapes how traits are expressed.
Temperament
Temperament: Genetically based tendencies in behavior, emotion, and thinking.
Differs from personality:
Temperament = biological & early appearing
Personality = socially shaped & develops later
Common 4-type temperament systems (many versions):
Sanguine / Choleric / Melancholic / Phlegmatic
Myers-Briggs
Keirsey
DiSC, Enneagram, True Colors, etc.
No consistent sex differences across types.
The Big Five (OCEAN Model)
Five broad personality traits:
Openness – openness to new ideas and experiences
High: creative, curious
Low: traditional, resistant to change
Conscientiousness – responsibility and self-discipline
High: reliable, organized
Low: careless, disorganized
Extraversion – sociability and energy
High: outgoing, talkative
Low: reserved, quiet
Agreeableness – cooperation and compassion
High: kind, forgiving
Low: critical, manipulative
Neuroticism – emotional instability
High: anxious, insecure
Low: calm, emotionally stable
Research shows mindfulness is positively related to most traits except neuroticism.
Cognitive Dispositions
Mental patterns that affect how people interpret the world:
Locus of Control
Internal: outcomes depend on personal actions
External: outcomes depend on luck or outside forces
Cognitive Complexity
Ability to:
Notice multiple cues
Integrate information
Interpret abstract behavior
High complexity = better understanding of others
Authoritarianism & Dogmatism
Authoritarianism: obedience to authority
Dogmatism: rigid belief system, “black-and-white” thinking
Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA):
Submission to authority
Aggression toward rule-breakers
Strong adherence to norms
Negatively impacts interpersonal relationships
Emotional Intelligence (EQ)
Ability to perceive, understand, manage, and use emotions
High EQ → better relationships and social skills
Related concept: Affective Orientation (AO) – using emotions to guide behavior
Personal-Social Dispositions
Traits that affect social relationships:
Loneliness
Emotional: lack of close bonds
Social: lack of social network
Leads to lower self-esteem and social skill issues
Depression
Involves sadness, hopelessness, guilt
Negatively affects all relationships
Self-Esteem
Overall sense of self-worth
Low self-esteem → more relational problems
Narcissism
Excessive self-focus and need for admiration
Conversational narcissism:
Bragging
Interrupting
Ignoring others
Leads to unsatisfying interactions
Machiavellianism
Manipulative, goal-oriented, emotionally detached
People are seen as tools
Leads to distrust and dissatisfaction
Empathy
Ability to understand and share others’ emotions
High empathy → stronger, more satisfying relationships
Self-Monitoring
High self-monitors: adapt behavior to situation
Low self-monitors: behave consistently regardless of context
High self-monitoring linked to:
Better relationships
Leadership roles
Faster relational development
3.3 Communication & Relational Dispositions
Key Focus
Examines communication dispositions (how people communicate)
Examines relational dispositions (how people think and behave in relationships)
Based on John Daly’s framework
Communication Dispositions
Communication dispositions = consistent patterns of communicative behavior.
Introversion / Extraversion
Exists on a continuum
Extraverts: talkative, outgoing, socially confident
Introverts: quiet, reserved, less socially expressive
Largely biologically based
Extraverts are often perceived as:
More intelligent
More friendly
More attractive
Extraverts tend to have more communication opportunities → stronger skills
Approach & Avoidance Traits
Describe whether people approach or avoid communication situations.
Shyness
Discomfort in social interaction
Two types:
Anxious shyness: fear of social interaction
Self-conscious shyness: fear of being judged or noticed
Causes include:
Low self-esteem
Fear of evaluation
Past teasing or bullying
Shyness limits communication opportunities → weaker skill development
Communication Apprehension (CA)
Fear or anxiety about real or anticipated communication
Measured by PRCA-24
Four types:
Interpersonal
Group
Meeting
Public
High CA individuals are often perceived as:
Less attractive
Less trustworthy
Less satisfying to interact with
CA negatively affects relationship development
Mindfulness can reduce communication apprehension
Willingness to Communicate (WTC)
Predisposition to initiate communication
High WTC:
Initiate interactions more often
Work harder to communicate effectively
Low WTC:
Less likely to start conversations
Can still communicate competently once engaged
Considered an approach trait
Argumentativeness vs. Verbal Aggressiveness
Verbal Aggressiveness
Attacking someone’s self-concept, not their ideas
Targets:
Group membership
Personal failings
Relational failings
Considered destructive
Leads to:
Dislike
Relationship dissatisfaction
Argumentativeness
Attacking ideas or positions, not people
Considered constructive
Encourages discussion and debate
Highly argumentative ≠ verbally aggressive
Sociocommunicative Orientation
Focuses on how people balance assertiveness and responsiveness.
Responsiveness
Concern for others’ feelings and needs
Traits include:
Empathy
Warmth
Sensitivity
Listening
Assertiveness
Ability to:
Initiate
Maintain
End conversations
Traits include:
Confidence
Independence
Leadership
Standing one’s ground
Versatility
Ability to adapt communication style to the situation
Combines assertiveness and responsiveness appropriately
High versatility = competent communicator
Low versatility = rigid, dogmatic communication
Sociocommunicative Orientation & Relationships
Assertive people:
Take control during conflict or repair
Emphasize optimism
Responsive people:
Listen
Encourage self-disclosure
Effective relational repair depends on matching styles
Relational Dispositions
Patterns of thinking that influence how people view relationships.
Attachment Theory
Humans are biologically driven to form attachments
Early attachment influences relationships across life
Adult Attachment Styles:
Secure
Feel lovable
Trust others
Healthy, satisfying relationships
Preoccupied
Feel unworthy
Seek approval from others
Fearful
Feel unworthy
Expect rejection
Avoid relationships
Dismissing
Feel worthy
Distrust others
Avoid intimacy
Rejection Sensitivity
Degree to which people:
Expect rejection
Perceive rejection
React strongly to rejection
Highly sensitive individuals:
Assume rejection
See rejection even when it isn’t present
Respond with withdrawal, hostility, or distress
Can lead to:
Avoiding relationships
Shorter relationship duration
Closely linked to attachment styles