Knowt
(2) Eric Birling Character Analysis || An Inspector Calls #gcseenglish (copy-better?)
Eric Burling's Character Analysis
How is he presented - Introduction
Eric Birling is presented as a deeply flawed character, characterized by his alcoholism, instances of sexual violence, and theft. He represents a generation that grapples with the consequences of a privileged upbringing during the early 20th century. Throughout the play "An Inspector Calls," he is the only character who engages in actual recognized criminal behavior, yet by the end, he exhibits a idefinite willingness to change and accept social responsibility. However, some may argue that his transformation appears superficial and lacks genuine remorse, as he often shifts the blame onto others instead of taking full accountability for his actions.
Background
Eric's depiction as an alcoholic, rapist, and thief reflects the struggles and moral confusion faced by the younger generation in a society steeped in privilege and entitlement. His character raises questions about the impact of wealth on morality and responsibility. The burdens of expectation from his affluent family weigh heavily on him, leading to destructive behaviors.
Isolation
During the family dinner scene, Eric is portrayed as physically and emotionally isolated from the others, emphasizing his role as an outsider. Stage directions indicate ‘Eric downstage,’ further highlighting his separation. He stands out as the only single person at the event—an engagement party celebrating his sister—making his inability to participate and connect with family much more pronounced. He is characterized as "not quite at ease, half shy, half assertive," suggesting an internal conflict and discomfort in his familial relationships, particularly with his controlling father.
Coping Mechanism
To cope with his underlying personal issues, Eric resorts to alcohol. His drinking patterns are erratic, leading to behavior that others perceive as unseemly. For instance, Sheila lightly mocks him by saying, "you’re squiffy" (tipsy), indicating a stigma surrounding his alcohol use. The family, particularly his father, Arthur Birling, dismisses Eric’s struggles and regards him with contempt, highlighting the lack of understanding and support he receives. This dismissal further alienates him and exacerbates his issues.
Empathy and Moral Complexity
Unlike his father, Eric demonstrates emotional reactions to the tragic suicide of Eva Smith, highlighting a sense of empathy that is largely absent in older generations. He challenges the capitalist ideology by questioning, “Why shouldn’t they try for higher wages?” This inquiry indicates his growing moral awareness and understanding of social injustice, suggesting an internal struggle between his upbringing and his evolving views.
Drinking and Responsibility
Eric’s drinking is depicted as a significant factor that leads to a series of irresponsible decisions. This culminates in the egregious act of rape against Eva Smith, exposing the difficult complexities of his character. While he appears remorseful, it is unclear whether this remorse leads to genuine change or if it is simply a result of societal pressure.
Revelation and Denial
Eric wrestles with the notion of fully taking responsibility for his actions, often downplaying their severity. He avoids labeling his behavior as rape and instead attributes his actions to alcohol, stating, "I was in that state when a chap easily turns nasty." This reveals his struggles with accountability and hints at a deeper societal issue regarding how men like him perceive their actions as unaccountable or excusable under the influence. His statement, combined with an expression of anger toward his family, further emphasizes his refusal to confront the gravity of his misconduct.
Character Growth and Redemption?
The chaotic behavior exhibited by Eric towards the play’s conclusion casts doubt on the sincerity of his apparent change. Although he admits to being "to blame - and I'm desperately sorry," his intoxication raises significant questions regarding his accountability and whether his acknowledgment of wrongdoing is authentic or merely performative.
Contextual Significance
Eric’s portrayal serves as a critique of societal attitudes towards young men in the period preceding WWI. Priestley aims to emphasize the potential of younger, progressive figures, like Sheila, who contrasts sharply with Eric, whose fate—even amidst the changing social awareness—seems predetermined and fraught with consequence.
Discussion Questions
Is Eric's change sincere or merely an act of defiance against his parents?
What does this suggest about Priestley's messages regarding social responsibility and the potential for change within individuals?
