In-Depth Notes on Sampling in Auditing
Chapter 8 - Sampling
Definition of Sampling
- Sampling: Application of an audit procedure to less than 100% of items within an account balance or class of transactions to evaluate characteristics of that balance or class.
- Source: AS 15, par. 28
Benefits and Risks of Sampling
- Benefits: Cost-effective, time-efficient, allows auditors to draw conclusions without examining entire populations.
- Risks: Inaccuracies due to sampling risk and nonsampling risk.
Types of Risk
- Sampling Risk: The possibility that the sample drawn is not representative of the population, potentially leading to incorrect conclusions.
- Incorrect Rejection (Type 1): Concludes control is not effective when it is.
- Incorrect Acceptance (Type 2): Concludes control is effective when it is not.
- Nonsampling Risk: Arises from human judgment errors, such as inappropriate procedures or incorrect interpretations.
Audit Efficiency vs. Effectiveness
- Efficiency: Related to reducing time and resources spent in audits.
- Effectiveness: Concerned with obtaining accurate and reliable results.
When to Use Statistical Sampling
- Ideal when:
- Exact information isn’t required.
- Population is large and homogeneous.
- Trade-offs between effectiveness and efficiency.
Determining Test Objectives
- Tests of Controls: Validity of controls in place.
- Binary Outcome: Control is either working or not.
- Substantive Tests: Assess the reasonableness of assertions.
- Focus on material correctness of valuations.
Defining the Population
- Key considerations include:
- Assertion tested.
- Test objectives must ensure population completeness.
Defining the Sampling Unit
- Individual elements of the population.
- Tests of Controls Examples: Individual invoices or items on an invoice.
- Substantive Tests Examples: Customer balances or specific invoices.
Determining the Sampling Technique
- Statistical Techniques: Equal probability and monetary unit sampling.
- Non-Statistical Techniques: Haphazard, block selection, judgmental selection.
Sample Size Determinants
- Sample size influenced by:
- Tolerable Deviation Rate: Higher tolerance means smaller sample sizes.
- Expected Population Deviation Rate: Higher expectations necessitate larger sample sizes.
- Desired Confidence Level: Higher confidence levels require larger samples.
Factor Effects on Sample Size
- Population size has minimal effect unless small (less than 1,000 items).
- Expected deviation rate directly affects sample size.
- Tolerable deviation rate inversely relates to sample size.
- Desired confidence level directly influences sample size.
Sampling Risk Example
- Example with 100 pens (red or blue).
- To test percentage of red pens, options include counting all or random sampling.
Tests of Controls and Sampling Deviations
- When sample deviation rate is low compared to tolerable deviation rate, concerns arise over either Type 1 or Type 2 errors depending on context.
Understanding and Analyzing Deviations Observed
- Qualitative aspects matter:
- Determine the nature (error or fraud) and its consequences (monetary misstatement).
Documenting the Sampling Procedure
- Important documentation includes:
- Materiality threshold (tolerable misstatement).
- Summary of accumulated misstatements.
- Auditor’s conclusions and rationale for decisions made.