9. The Right to Organise

Recap of Previous Lecture

  • Freedom of Association (FoA)

    • A fundamental right recognized in many national constitutions.

    • Protected under various international and regional legal instruments, including:

    • International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions.

    • European Social Charter.

    • European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

    • Comprises three dimensions:

    • Freedom to be in association with others.

    • Freedom in the association of others.

    • Freedom to act in association with others.

    • European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law on Article 11 ECHR since 2002:

    • Includes the right to utilize trade union services.

    • The right to be represented by a trade union.

    • Right to bargain collectively.

    • Right to strike.

    • Secondary Actions: Accessory to FoA; the UK has a complete ban on such actions, permissible under Article 11.

    • Courts tend to allow a wide margin of appreciation to states regarding social policy issues (e.g., abolition of Wage Boards in the UK).

Today’s Intended Learning Outcomes

  • Describe the definition and implications of the Right to Organise.

  • Outline and apply the legal provisions protecting the right to be a trade union member:

    • Trade Union Labour Relations Consolidated Act (TULRCA) sections 137-167.

    • Important sections: 137, 146, 152, 145A, 145B.

    • Blacklisting Regulations 2010.

  • Evaluate the adequacy of the remedies available for breach of these rights.

Required Reading

  • Textbook: Collins, Ewing, McColgan, pp 478-521, 571-80, 706-712.

  • Recent Court Cases:

    • Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley & Ors [2021] UKSC 47.

    • Mercer v Alternative Future Group Ltd & Anor [2022] EWCA Civ 379.

    • Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer [2022] UKSC 80.

The Right to Organise

  • Definition:

    • First dimension of FoA; involves the freedom to associate with others.

    • Discussion of whether it should be termed a ‘freedom’ or ‘right’.

    • It represents a negative freedom, defined as freedom from restraint.

    • Consideration of its standalone significance.

    • According to ILO Convention No. 98, there is a mandate for "adequate protection against acts of anti-union discrimination."

  • Industrial Relations Act 1971:

    • Offers protection against discrimination based on trade union membership and participation in union activities.

    • Establishes the right not to join a union, which contributed to the legislation's survival through political changes from 1979-1997.

  • ECtHR Interpretation:

    • Positive obligations are derived from Article 11 ECHR, resulting in UK governmental changes regarding employment offers and collective agreement rights.

Protection of Positive Freedom of Association in UK Law

  • Establishes a set of rights regarding associations.

  • Notable protections include:

    • Right to not be refused employment due to trade union membership (TULRCA s.137).

    • Prohibition against blacklisting (Blacklisting Regs).

    • Right to not face discrimination:

    • Workers cannot suffer detriment (TULRCA s.146).

    • Employees may not be dismissed (TULRCA s.152).

    • Prohibition on ‘sweetener payments’ (TULRCA ss.145A-F).

    • These rights were introduced to comply with ECtHR judgments on Wilson and Palmer cases.

    • Importance of studying these sections in detail for application.

Refusal of Employment - TULRCA Provisions

  • TULRCA § 137(1): Unlawful to refuse employment based on:

    • (a) union membership status.

    • (b) unwillingness to join or cease to be a member of a trade union.

  • Broad Definition of ‘Refusal’ in § 137(5):

    • Includes actions like refusing to process applications or causing applicants to withdraw.

    • Making unreasonable terms for employment offers, or retracting job offers.

  • Employment Agencies: Similar provisions applied (TULRCA § 138).

  • Remedies for Breach (TULRCA § 140):

    • Compensation and non-enforceable recommendations.

    • Compensation can be awarded against third parties, such as trade unions enforcing closed shop agreements.

Refusal of Employment - Further Considerations

  • Concealment of trade union membership/activities leading to dismissal.

  • § 137 does not protect individuals if the job is not outright refused, instead § 152 may apply.

  • Fitzpatrick v British Railways Board [1992]: Protection includes both pre-employment and post-employment screenings.

Protection Against Discrimination at Work - TULRCA

  • Provisions under TULRCA §§ 146-167:

    • Workers are protected from hostility stemming from:

    • Trade union membership.

    • Participation in trade union activities.

    • Utilization of trade union services.

  • Hostility defined as:

    • Detriment (s. 146).

    • Dismissal (s. 152).

  • Detriment can also result from inducements (ss. 145A and 145B).

  • Include reference to Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley & Ors [2021] UKSC 47: no qualifying employment period required for complaints.

Recent Case Law: Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley & Ors [2021]

  • Case focused on prohibited inducements under § 145B TULRCA.

  • Employer's payment offer required workers to abandon collective bargaining rights.

  • Supreme Court ruling: Employers cannot make offers to workers before collective bargaining processes are fully exhausted, respecting collective bargaining principles.

Protection from Detriment - TULRCA

  • Detriment Protections as per § 146:

    • Workers should not face detriment linked to:

    • Union membership.

    • Participation in union activities.

    • Making use of trade union services.

    • Definition of Activities: Not explicitly defined; interpretations based on case law recommend a broad understanding.

  • Recent Case: Mercer v Alternative Future Group Ltd & Anor 2024:

    • Evaluated protections regarding participation in industrial actions under § 146.

    • Case involved Fiona Mercer, whose activities as a workplace rep were scrutinized post-action.

  • Supreme Court's Ruling: Indicated that the existing provisions of § 146 were incompatible with Article 11 ECHR, failing to protect against detriments short of dismissal.

Making Use of Trade Union Services

  • Provisions under §§ 146(2A), 152(2A) define services as available to workers via independent trade unions:

    • Involves representation by a trade union or union-driven concerns.

  • Exclusions: § 145B(4) notes that having employment terms set by collective agreement is not considered making use of union services.

    • Issues related to inducements to refuse collective bargaining protections become pertinent here.

Appropriateness of Timing for Engagement in Union Activities

  • Definition of 'an appropriate time' is stipulated:

    • Primarily, outside of working hours or during hours with employer consent.

  • Reference to §§ 146(2) and 152(2).

Protection From Unfair Dismissal

  • TULRCA § 152: Rights against unfair dismissal focused on union-related aspects:

    • Includes union membership, activities, or usage of union services.

  • Analysis of remedies includes:

    • Interim relief (ss. 161-166).

    • Minimum basic compensation, set at £7,836 (s. 156).

    • Additional compensation awards, subject to caps (ERA 1996 s. 117).

Protection Against Inducements

  • Provisions against discriminatory inducements aimed at encouraging abandonment of union membership or activities highlighted in §§ 145A and 145B:

    • Protections extend against detriment or dismissal due to not accepting said inducements.

    • Remedies under § 145E: Enables ET declarations and compensatory awards.

    • These protections apply only to individuals directly offered inducements.

Blacklisting Regulations and Related Legal Framework

  • Background: Originating from Employment Rights Act 1999 and enacted through Blacklisting Regulations 2010.

    • Regulations Include:

    • Prohibition of compiling, using, selling, or supplying a ‘prohibited list’ (Reg 3).

    • Prohibited actions include refusal to employ or denying services (Regs 5, 6, 9, 12).

  • Remedies Available: Focus shifts to declarations and compensation without retroactive effects on dismissals.

Evaluation of Legal Protections and Remedies

  • Critiques of Statutory Framework:

    • Points raised include the rigid division between individual and collective rights.

    • Combines narrow interpretations, potentially rendering legal enforcement challenging.

    • Emphasis on an individual’s responsibility to report infringements leaves protections limited, lacking union intervention.

    • Discrepancies in remedies explained: compensation lacks a punitive nature, reinstatement for dismissal is generally absent.

Conclusion

  • Reflection on Learning Outcomes:

    • The right to organise encompasses numerous protections and provisions essential for safeguarding trade union rights of members.

    • Gaps in current legislation necessitate ongoing assessment and potential amendments to align with evolving legal standards and protections under ECHR Frameworks.