8.2 & 8.3: Electronegativity, Bond Polarity, and Dipole Moments

Electronegativity

  • Definition: Electronegativity is the ability of an atom in a molecule to attract shared electrons to itself. It describes the different affinities of atoms for the electrons within a chemical bond.

Linus Pauling's Method for Determining Electronegativity
  • Developer: Linus Pauling (1901-1995), an American scientist and Nobel Prize laureate (Chemistry and Peace), developed the most widely accepted method for determining electronegativity values.

  • Hypothetical Molecule Example: To understand Pauling's model, consider a hypothetical molecule HXHX.

  • Relative Electronegativity Determination: The relative electronegativities of the HH and XX atoms are determined by comparing the measured HXH-X bond energy with an "expected" HXH-X bond energy.

  • "Expected" Bond Energy Formula: The expected HXH-X bond energy is calculated as the average of the HHH-H and XXX-X bond energies:
    Expected H-X bond energy=H-H bond energy+X-X bond energy2\text{Expected H-X bond energy} = \frac{\text{H-H bond energy} + \text{X-X bond energy}}{2}

  • Difference (Δ\Delta) in Bond Energies: The difference, represented by Δ\Delta, between the actual (measured) and expected bond energies is: Δ=(HX)<em>act(HX)</em>exp\Delta = (H-X)<em>{\text{act}} - (H-X)</em>{\text{exp}}

    • Identical Electronegativities: If HH and XX have identical electronegativities, (HX)<em>act(H-X)<em>{\text{act}} and (HX)</em>exp(H-X)</em>{\text{exp}} are the same, resulting in Δ=0\Delta = 0. In this case, electrons are shared equally.

    • Different Electronegativities (Polarity): If XX has a greater electronegativity than HH, the shared electron(s) will be pulled closer to the XX atom. This creates a polar molecule with a partial negative charge on XX (δ\delta^-) and a partial positive charge on HH (δ+\delta^+):
      Hδ+XδH^{\delta^+} - X^{\delta^-}

  • Ionic Component and Bond Strength: This polar bond can be viewed as having both ionic and covalent components. The attraction between the partially (and oppositely) charged HH and XX atoms leads to a greater bond strength. Consequently, (HX)<em>act(H-X)<em>{\text{act}} will be larger than (HX)</em>exp(H-X)</em>{\text{exp}}.

  • Magnitude of Δ\Delta: The greater the difference in the electronegativities of the atoms, the larger the ionic component of the bond and the greater the value of Δ\Delta. This Δ\Delta value allows for the assignment of relative electronegativities.

Periodic Trends in Electronegativity
  • **General Trends (Figure 8.3):

    • Across a Period (Left to Right): Electronegativity generally increases.

    • Down a Group (Top to Bottom): Electronegativity generally decreases.

  • Range of Values: Electronegativity values range from 4.0\mathbf{4.0} for Fluorine (FF) to 0.7\mathbf{0.7} for Cesium (CsCs).

  • **Examples of Pauling Electronegativity Values (Excerpt from Figure 8.3):

    • F:4.0F: 4.0

    • O:3.5O: 3.5

    • Cl:3.0Cl: 3.0

    • N:3.0N: 3.0

    • Br:2.8Br: 2.8

    • C:2.5C: 2.5

    • S:2.5S: 2.5

    • H:2.1H: 2.1

    • Na:0.9Na: 0.9

    • Cs:0.7Cs: 0.7

Relationship Between Electronegativity and Bond Type (Table 8.1)
  • Electronegativity Difference of Zero:

    • Bond Type: Covalent

    • Electron Sharing: Electrons are shared equally; no polarity develops.

    • Example: H-H bond.

  • **Intermediate Electronegativity Difference (Increasing Polarity):

    • Bond Type: Polar covalent

    • Electron Sharing: Electrons are shared unequally.

    • Characteristics: Bonds have both covalent and ionic character.

  • Large Electronegativity Difference:

    • Bond Type: Ionic

    • Electron Transfer: Electron transfer occurs, forming ions that constitute an ionic substance.

    • Characteristics: Predominantly ionic character.

Interactive Example 8.1: Relative Bond Polarities
  • Task: Order the bonds H-H\text{H-H}, O-H\text{O-H}, Cl-H\text{Cl-H}, S-H\text{S-H}, and F-H\text{F-H} according to polarity.

  • Principle: Bond polarity increases as the difference in electronegativity between the bonded atoms increases.

  • **Electronegativity Values (from Figure 8.3):

    • H:2.1H: 2.1

    • S:2.5S: 2.5

    • Cl:3.0Cl: 3.0

    • O:3.5O: 3.5

    • F:4.0F: 4.0

  • **Calculated Electronegativity Differences and Polarity Order:

    1. HHH-H: (2.12.1 - 2.12.1) = 00

    2. SHS-H: (2.52.5 - 2.12.1) = 0.40.4

    3. ClHCl-H: (3.03.0 - 2.12.1) = 0.90.9

    4. OHO-H: (3.53.5 - 2.12.1) = 1.41.4

    5. FHF-H: (4.04.0 - 2.12.1) = 1.91.9

  • **Polarity Order (Least to Most Polar): \text{H-H} < \text{S-H} < \text{Cl-H} < \text{O-H} < \text{F-H}

    • Electronegativity Difference: 00.40.91.41.90 \quad \quad 0.4 \quad \quad 0.9 \quad \quad 1.4 \quad \quad 1.9

    • Bond Type: \text{Covalent bond} \quad \text{Polar covalent bond} \quad \text{Polarity increases}

Critical Thinking: Implications of Uniform Electronegativity
  • Scenario: What if all atoms had the same electronegativity values?

  • **Impact on Bonding:

    • Only Covalent Bonds: All bonds between atoms would be purely covalent (or nonpolar covalent).

    • No Ionic Bonds: No electron transfer would occur, preventing the formation of ionic substances.

    • No Polar Covalent Bonds: No partial charges (δ+,δ\delta^+, \delta^-) would develop, eliminating polar molecules.

  • **Noticeable Differences:

    • Lack of Polarity-Dependent Properties: Many physical and chemical properties that depend on molecular polarity (e.g., solubility in polar solvents, boiling points due to dipole-dipole interactions, hydrogen bonding) would not exist or would be drastically altered.

    • Reduced Reactivity/Specificity: Chemical reactions relying on charge differential and electrostatic attractions would be significantly different or absent.

    • Uniformity in Electron Sharing: All shared electrons would be distributed equally between bonded atoms.