Chap 8 Part 4
- Civic virtue vs. private interest after the war and the 1780s crises
- The old republican belief that civic virtue would sustain popular liberty waned
- Washington’s sober view: "the few… who act upon Principles of disinterestedness are, comparatively speaking, no more than a drop in the Ocean."
- The Constitution reflected a shift: interest, not virtue, shapes most people's behavior most of the time
- Public life would feature the clash of diverse interest groups; the national government must manage this dynamic
- Federalists’ solution: national government as an impartial umpire
- Madison and others didn’t believe competition among private interests would automatically foster the public welfare
- The national government should act as a disinterested and dispassionate umpire in disputes between different passions and interests in the State
- A large republic, with millions of citizens, would yield more of that scarce resource: disinterested gentlemen dedicated to the public good
- Such gentlemen, whose enlightened views and virtuous sentiments, render them superior to local prejudices, would fill the small number of national offices: the idea of elites informed by virtue guiding national policy
- Anti-Federalists’ counterpoint
- Anti-Federalists argued common people were more virtuous than elites thought; gentlemen were more self-interested than Federalists admitted
- Critique: lawyers, men of learning, and moneyed men would accrue power and wealth and dominate ordinary folks
- They favored representation from every social class and occupational group, not a government controlled by a disinterested elite
- Ratification and political fear
- The narrow majorities for ratification reflected ongoing fears that states were surrendering too much power to a central government
- Patrick Henry became a leading Anti-Federalist figure, declining to attend the Constitutional Convention in 1787
- Henry’s famous line: he refused to attend and said he "smelt a rat"; he asserted, "I am not a Virginian, but an American."
- Henry’s conviction that sovereignty should remain with the states would haunt the Union for decades
- CHAPTER SUMMARY: postwar constitutional misalignments and the move toward a national framework
- Leading Americans began to rethink federalism as the postrevolutionary period revealed weaknesses in both state and national governments
- For about a decade after independence, revolutionaries were more focused on organizing 13 separate state republics than on creating a single national republic
- The Articles of Confederation created a national legislature but gave states control over the purse and virtually all formal lawmaking and enforcement powers
- Westward expansion produced both international tensions (with Britain and Spain) and internal tensions (how to democratize state legislatures)
- Ordinary Americans began to organize workers; women pressed for greater political, legal, and educational opportunities; religious dissenters called for disestablishment
- Mid-1780s crisis: controversy over the Jay–Gardoqui Treaty and Shays’s Rebellion highlighted the fragility of the Confederation
- The Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the birth of a national republic
- The Convention produced an entirely new frame of government that established a truly national republic
- Separation of powers established among three branches: judiciary, a bicameral legislature, and a strong executive
- The new structure aimed to curb factional excess and balance competing interests within a large polity
- Anti-Federalist concession and the Bill of Rights
- Anti-Federalists softened objections when promised a Bill of Rights after ratification
- The Bill of Rights was incorporated into the Constitution during ratification debates to protect individual liberties against potential centralized tyranny
- Key terms and concepts to recall
- Federalists: proponents of a strong national government to manage competing interests and serve the public good
- Anti-Federalists: opponents who feared centralized power and favored retention of sovereignty by the states
- Disinterested umpire: the idea that a large republic could produce leaders who act for the common good rather than private advantage
- Separation of powers: framework separating judicial, legislative, and executive powers to prevent abuse and encourage balance
- Bicameral legislature: two-house Congress as part of the new national framework
- Bill of Rights: first amendments promised to and adopted to protect individual rights
- Important dates and figures to remember
- Constitutional Convention:
- Jay–Gardoqui Treaty crisis: mid-1780s
- Shays’s Rebellion: mid-1780s
- Patrick Henry: notable Anti-Federalist opposition leader
- Connections to broader themes
- Transition from a loose confederation of states to a unified national republic
- Tensions between virtue and interest in political theory and practice
- Real-world implications for governance: how to balance local autonomy with national unity, and how to guard against the tyranny of the majority or elites
- Ethical and practical considerations: governance legitimacy, representation, rights protection, and the role of representative elites in public decision-making