Ethics - Map a Node Presentations
Avery Metheny — Vaccine Mandates
Pro
Vaccination mandates help the majority of people
Herd immunity
Con
Bodily autonomy and choice
Casual links to side effects leading to disorders
Inconsistent link (could have connection, but no proof of causation)
Storing vaccines is inconvenient
Storage of vaccines leads to increase in CO2 emissions
Legal
States decide requirements for schoolchildren
Can require vaccinations of healthcare workers and patients
Exemptions are allowed in most states
Religion or medical circumstances
Jeremy Bentham
Save most lives using vaccinations, more happiness
Not in favor of religious exemptions
Robert Nozick
Extreme libertarian
Huge believer in bodily autonomy
Mandates take autonomy from people
Vaccination mandate would be government power overreach
Tarun Chapalamadugu — Internet Piracy
Intro
Digital piracy = illegally downloading media without payment
Piracy is not theft, but it is copyright infringement
Does decrease sales
Getting stuff for free, but author gets nothing
Brian Skyrms
Social Contract + Game Theory
Traditional social contract: rational people + rational thinking = rational contract
The Stag Hunt
Variation of prisoner’s dilemma
Solo vs cooperative options via stag or hare
Societal values can influence decision
Lots of decisions create norms, which create social contract and law
’Murica
Solo option (individual holds on media)
Norm against piracy → piracy is immoral
Therefore, morality depends on location and values of a society
Immanuel Kant
Categorial imperative: universalizability principle
People ought not to pirate all the time, for any reason → piracy immoral
No income to creators = no media
Mere means test
Treating authors as means to knowledge
Immoral, as it violates the autonomy of authors
Opinion
Would it make a difference if I pirate?
Benefits: accessibility, exposure, “free trial”
Morality is circumstantial
If you can afford to pay and you pirate, it’s morally wrong since you could have contributed to the author
Isabella Loparco — CRISPR
Intro
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats
Medical tech that advanced the science of gene editing and manipulation
Replacement of parts of DNA
Pros
Prevent genetic diseases
Lower risk of illness
Parental choice of favorable characteristics
Cons
Unsure of consequences and harm
Expensive, could create social inequality
“Designer babies” unfairly advantaged
Charlie Gard: mitochondrial depletion syndrome
Could have been saved with surgery but court ruled against since it was untested
Julian Savulescu
Research on enhancing DNA
Believed Charlie should have had surgery
Obligation to improve human species
Morally negligent to abandon research
Parents obligated to help their children
CRISPR can be limited to prevent social inequality
St. Thomas Aquinas
Believed in human and god connection
Editing genes = violating natural law
Human intervention of god’s work
Natural order acts like a compass away from evil
Divine law guides people to fulfill holy life
Eudaimonia from Aristotle: constant improvement = pro CRISPR
Caitlin Jones — Prostitution
Immanuel Kant
Celibate
Humans are never to be used as means to an end (except for specialized work with agreement)
Prostitution is still wrong (human should not be used as sexual means)
Lust and objectification trump reason in animals, and humans should distance from this behavior
Elizabeth Anscombe
Modern utilitarian (?)
Sex naturally associated with shame, absent from reason
“Casual” sex = sex without the intention of pregnancy is an “abuse of generative organs”
But prostitution could promote the most happiness (hedonism??)
Igor Primoratz
Morally questionable, not inherent to prostitution
Clients, pimps, STDs
Aversion against prostitution is a prudent matter, not a moral one
Sex outside of marriage is ok
Marital duty: marriage for wrong reasons
Seek marriage for sexual reasons??
Prostitution should be legalized in order to set regulations
Mac Wang — Autonomous Vehicles
Five levels of automation: none, driver assist, partial, conditional, high, full
First conceptualized: 1987; Mass market: 2020
Jeremy Bentham
Pro automation
Less likely to cause crashes
Decreases the dangers of fatigue
Requires no experience to drive
Objectively safer
Paul Virilio
Con automation
Ethical programming (boxed car dilemma)
Human agency (loss of human decisions and control)
Study of speed and technology on society
Job displacement
Legal regulations: AV 4.0 guidelines for autonomous vehicles
Prioritize safety
Emphasize security and cybersecurity
Ensure privacy and data security (not share without knowledge)
Enhance mobility and accessibility
Opinion
Widespread adoption of self-driving cars maximizes overall happiness and well-being
It enhances safety, efficiency, accessibility, and environmental sustainability
However, current self-driving tech is not yet ready for level 4-5 automation
Who takes responsibility of a crash caused by an AV crash?
Luca Achilles — Marijuana
Intro
Cannabis is a psychoactive drug that releases feelings of euphoria
Side effects: fatigue, loss of appetite…?
Could be a “gateway drug” into worse drugs
Dale Jacquette
Advocates for marijuana legalization
Agreed with deontology
Humans can use reasoning to make ethical choices
Categorical imperatives
Universalism
Means and outcome are acceptable since they do not directly cause violations of categorical imperatives
John Locke
Natural law theory (?!)
Human reasoning decides right and wrong
Laws can be deemed against human behavior
Hedonism (?!)
Focusses humans should strive to gain pleasure
Consequential
Support marijuana
Does not hurt anyone
Use is for personal benefit
Anti marijuana
Negative health effects
Against personal reasoning
Social contract theory
Would be unethical since it’s against the law
Divine command theory
Christianity: ethical dilemma; bible does not specify
Depends with other religions
Conclusion
Ethicality of marijuana is dependent on ethical theory
Alice Sakhatskyy — Consumerism
Adam Smith
Wealth of Nations
Laissez faire capitalism — government should not be involved in economy
“Invisible hand”
David Hume = friend
Competition is driven by self-interest, positive effect on society
Government intervention = stagnation
Berry Schwartz
Abundance of choice → paralysis, not liberation
Imagined alternative causes regret
Choosing one thing is not choosing to do the other, disappointment
We need to set boundaries
Karl Marx
Estranged labor
Alienation from the product of labor; loss of identity
Lack fulfillment; dehumanization
Commodification
Kostas Saravanos — Corporate Discrimination
Definition of discrimination
Original
“Recognizing and understanding the difference between one thing and another”
Negative connotation in 19th century due to racial tension
“Unfair or prejudicial treatment…”
History — Affirmative Action: introduced during Civil Rights Movement to broaden opportunities for African-Americans
Resulted in lower productivity rates among students
“Diversity positions” given to unqualified individuals
Led to increased racial tension and resentment
Economic
Legal discrimination quantifies risk and determines insurance rates
Controversy arose when factors such as race, zipcode led to consumer stereotyping
Generalizes races
Marx
Insurance discrimination is a part of societal evolution
Hierarchical equality is unattainable, leading to destruction of classes + communism
Rawls
Theory of Justice as Fairness, refuting utilitarianism
Acknowledge suffering of minority
Veil of ignorance: true justice determined by rational, equal individuals
Discrimination could benefits minorities (?)
Discriminate to do better in business
Best option is the “fair option” determined under the veil
Sam Zhang — Net Neutrality
See presentation
Gabby Hernandez — Extreme Sports
Utilitarianism and Jeremy Bentham
Maximize overall good
Everyone’s happiness counts the same
The ends justify the means (consequentialism)
As long as this sport gives the most people entertainment, danger is outweighed and justified
Libertarianism and Frank Van Dun
One should be free to act
Right to life, freedom, property
Non-agression rule
Prohibits acts of violence against others (including speech)
Would say the participants of extreme sports would be fine as long as they agree with it
Situations
Michael Oher — football player who suffered injuries and was not given promised money
von Trips at Italian Grand Prix — leader died in crash and also killed some spectators
JB - ethical
FVD - ethical for leader, unethical for spectators
J. B. Pogue — Piracy
Piracy = gaining access to copyrighted work without proper payment
“The Pirate Bay”
Gary Bowser: has to pay 14.5M dollars and imprisoned
Yuzu Emulator: allowed people to emulate Nintendo games; sued + taken down by Nintendo
Gary Santillanes
Leaned towards consequentialism
Supporter of piracy in specific scenaios
Gatekeeping information on people who cannot afford it is unethical
Immanuel Kant
Morality is a constant
“If I allow one person to pirate, shouldn’t everyone else be entitled to do the same?”
Others
Creators of product don’t lose anything from piracy
Some don’t want to support artists who are unethical, but still want to use the product
It can destroy smaller businesses
Many people don’t even need to pirate
Lily Shirmohammed — Surrogacy
Background
Surrogacy = woman agrees to carry and give birth to a child
Intended parents (IPs) = receiving the baby
If the child has DNA from the surrogate, is the mother the caretaker or the birth-giver?
Gestational: Use of sperm and egg; zygote fertilized in a lab
Result: No biological connection to surrogate
Paid less than expected; exploitation
Discrimination against certain surrogate mothers
Peter Singer
Utilitarian
Desires of everyone is fulfilled
Elizabeth Anderson
Surrogacy makes women and children as commodities
Dehumanizes women
Must not treat people as means to an end
Potential counterargument: surrogate gives consent
But not the child
Immanuel Kant
Intent > consequences
Principle of autonomy: depriving women of the right to rule their bodies
Pro-surrogacy
John Stuart Mill
Utilitarian
Right to one’s self
Pro-surrogacy
St. Thomas Aquinas
Natural Law Theory
All things made for a specific purpose in the eyes of God
If infertile, God didn’t intend you to have a child
Most likely anti-surrogacy
Jay Shankar — Government Surveillance
Background
Monitoring of individual habits and activities
Conducted via various technologies, e.g. cameras, AI, data analytics, phone tapping, satellites
Use of AI to analyze large volumes of data and identify patterns
Gray area of legality; potential for overreach
Utilitarianism and Social Contract Theory
Surveillance as crime deterrent and societal protection
Maintains order
Virtue Ethics and Biopower
Loss of freedom and autonomy
Bentham
Panopticon thought experiment = circular prison
Constant surveillance = deterrence
Surveillance is a sacrifice to individualism for the good of society
Hobbes
Individuals give up certain freedoms for protection
Nasty, brutish society with no government
Surveillance as means of fulfilling and enforcing social contract
People act out of self-interest; constant competition → surveillance for stability and societal order
Foucault
Panopticon revisited
People act lawful out of fear, not genuine morality
Surveillance as means of governmental control
Government sets societal standards; subtle control
Surveillance = reduction in individual autonomy
Potential for oppression by governments
People act in what the government thinks is right
Corruption
Aristotle
True Virtue and Free Will: people should act out of their own accord
Actions out of fear is not true self
Surveillance subverts trust within society
People act unnaturally out of fear
Gov doesn’t trust citizens
Blake Dodd — CRISPR
See Isabella for CRISPR background
Potential for weaponizing: superhumans
Bentham
CRISPR can eradicate diseases
Believed in scientific advancement
Would advocate for equality in offerings
Peter Singer
Reducing suffering
Enhancing well-being
Altruism
Supports it but wants strict regulations to society (no human testing/weaponizing)
Pros
Customization and happiness
Ridding humanity of diseases
Aid in accelerating evolution (would enhance eugenics for humans)
Cons
Unknown side effects
Expensive and exclusive
Inequalities and weaponization (militarization of super soldiers)
Opinion
CRISPR should be ethical since it gives utility
Less suffering from disease
More crop yield
Customizing
Lily Van Wyk — Generative Art
Background
AI are trained on “stolen” art
Generate images similar to artist styles
Can save resources (free instead of commissioning artists)
Artists do not receive credit/compensation (sorta like pirating)
Immanuel Kant and Categorical Imperatives
Would say it’s unethical
Binding moral law
Universalizability
If you do it, everyone should be able to, no exceptions
Obligated to act the right way
Autonomy
Moral agency
Dignity, respect, and right to one’s work
Personal integrity and rational decision making
Reasonings
Stealing art are unethical
AI is misleading since it’s drawing on stolen art training
Devalues art
Individual value
All people have value
Artists should be respected and given due compensation for contribution
Luciano Floridi
Would say it’s unethical
Philosophy of information and information ethics
Responsible use of information
Reasonings
Misinformation directly harms us
AI does not have autonomy but the people training the AI are responsible
AI generation from stolen work = misleading = misinformation
Abusing one’s ability to share
Abuse of digital privacy
Stolen artwork is infringement on digital safety
Respect human rights
Need to be trained with legality and ethicality in mind
Conclusion
Existence of generative AI is not unethical
Stolen, unethically trained, and misleading AI are
Keith White — Immigration Policy
Background
20th century immigration spike
Immigrants brought diversity
Triggered xenophobia → nativism
Berlin Wall
Wall surrounding West Berlin
To prevent skilled workers from fleeing communism
Separated families
“Open air prison”
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Philosopher and political theorist
Believed civilizations mankind (“Rousseau’s Regression”)
Criticized governments
Contributed to social contract theory
Ethical to restrict immigration if that’s what citizens desire
Immanuel Kant
Believed in concrete moral laws
Universalizability: best to act interest of others (pro-immigration)
Phillip Cole
Thinks people have a right to international freedom of movement
Ahmed Khan — Artificial Intelligence
Intro
Replicates human intelligence in machines
Rapid rate of technological growth — will AI surpass mankind?
Keep pushing for AI advancement or stop while we can?
Pros
AI diagnosis in healthcare: speed and accuracy
AI surveillance systems: public safety
AI teaching and explanation: education
AI-aided driving
Cons
Could cause unemployment
Privacy concern
Dependence on AI → lost creativity
Control
Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill
Utilitarians
In favor of AI
Give more happiness to more patients
There are more sick people than doctors
Keep people feeling safe from crime
Immanuel Kant
AI allows for greater access to knowledge
AI used (and created) for mere means
Nick Bostrom
Specializes in AI
Humans will become useless
Humans will be the ones monitored and used for data creation
Socrates
Would value human knowledge
Dependance on AI would stunt creativity
Opinion
It’s fine as of now
Should be halted should it become a threat
Jonathan Poisson — Gun Control
Intro
Gun related deaths
Balancing rights and safety
Public opinion
Michael Huemer
Right to self defense
Protection of property
Deterrence of tyranny (balance of power; citizens can check gov)
Individual autonomy
Hugh LaFollette
Considers community/family impact
Virtue ethics
No private citizen can own any guns OR every citizens can own any gun without regulation (two extreme vices)
Huemer/LaFollette Types of Rights
Fundamental rights
Huemer: Yes, protects fundamental interest of self preservation
LaFollette: No, not every means to a fundamental interest is a fundamental right
Derivative rights: protects non-fundamental interests and derives its weight from another right
Both philosophers agree; yes
Can all regulations be dismissed? NO
LaFollette: inherent danger of guns
Behavior causes harm → should be limited
Greater potential harm →greater restriction
Huemer potential solution: personal liability
Kant
Inherent danger in guns
Categorical imperative to not kill
Intention of government
Social contract theory
Derived vs. Fundamental = Irrelevant
People should protect their rights
Freedoms given up for protection
One freedom not given up: self preservation
John Locke
Rationality → self-preservation
Only rational people should have right to self-defense
Thomas Hobbes
Self-preservation → sole liberty
In order to defend oneself
Fine for defense, not fine for murder
Conclusion
We must do something
Locke/Hobbes paradox