Syntax and Embedded Sentences
Syntax: Additional Structures
Embedded Sentences
Example Sentence: "The children hope that the teacher forgets the exam"
Analysis Task: Analyze the sentence.
Identify the main verb phrase (VP).
Determine the function of the word "that" in the sentence.
Phrase Structure Breakdown:
Sentence Outline:
[The children hope [that the teacher forgets the exam]]
Components:
TP (Tense Phrase)
NP (Noun Phrase)
Det (Determiner)
N (Noun)
T’ (T-prime)
T (Tense)
VP (Verb Phrase)
V’ (Verb-prime)
V (Verb)
CP (Complementizer Phrase)
C’ (C-prime)
C (Complementizer)
-Q (Questions)
TP
NP
T’
T
VP
Recursive Rule in Practice: Recursive Sets
Embedding Concept: Embedding of categories within categories in syntax.
Key Insight: A finite syntactic system can generate an infinite number of sentences.
Competence vs Performance:
Linguistic Competence: Refers to the underlying mental grammar.
Linguistic Performance: Encompasses the actual use of grammar for language production and comprehension.
Example Application: Recognizing recursive rules in embedded sentences.
Transformation Rules and Movement
Question Formation Example
Statement: "The manager will fire the employee."
Related Question: "Will the manager fire the employee?"
Relationship Insight: There is an intuitive relation between the statement and the question.
Investigation Method: Analyze how questions derive from statements to reveal this relationship.
Surface Structures and Deep Structures
Example Sentences:
Statement: "The manager will fire the employee."
Question: "Will the manager fire the employee?"
Movement Analysis: The auxiliary verb "will" is moved to the beginning of the question.
Testing the Theory: Validating this movement by observing sentence structure.
Application to Complex Sentences
Complex Sentence: "The manager who will fire the employee will succeed."
Identify Auxiliaries: Two auxiliaries are present, leading to ambiguity over which one to move.
Initial Rule Application: If the first auxiliary moves, the result is ungrammatical:
Resulting Sentence: "*Will the manager who [ _ ] fire the employee will succeed."
Revising the Rule
Identifying Structure: Deep hierarchical structure reveals:
One auxiliary is situated in the main VP, while the other is in the embedded sentence.
Revised Rule: Move the auxiliary in the main VP to the front of the sentence.
Rule Testing and Confirmation
Testing the Revised Rule:
Resulting Sentence: "Will the manager who will fire the employee [ _ ] succeed."
Outcome: Produces a well-formed English sentence.
Relation to Universal Grammar (UG): Highlights that grammar is structure-dependent.
Yes-No Questions Reviewed
Observation: Various sentence types relate systematically to others.
Examples:
Statement: "The boy will dance."
Derived Question: "Will the boy dance?"
Underlying Structural Concept: Common underlying structures exist among sentence types.
Generation Process:
Two Steps involved:
Phrase Structure Rules generate a basic (deep) structure.
Transformational Rule—Auxiliary Inversion Rule—applies to produce the surface structure.
Structure Dependent Examples
Example Sentence: "The students in the linguistics class study the patterns of syntax."
Grammatical Form: This sentence is grammatically correct.
Incorrect Example: "*The student in the linguistics class studies the patterns of syntax."
Analysis: The incorrect form shows the necessity of syntactic structures.
Final Summary of Universal Grammar (UG)
Objective of UG Theory: Characterize native speaker knowledge and first language acquisition processes.
Principles and Variations:
UG Principles: Universal principles consistent across all languages.
UG Parameters: Account for the variations observed within the universally applicable principles.