I

Metaethics Overview

Key Concepts

  • Definition: Metaethics explores the nature, origin, and meaning of ethical concepts and moral judgments.

  • Objectivity in Morality:

    • Moral considerations appear objective; objectivism claims that moral facts determine the truth of moral judgments, independent of individual beliefs or cultural backgrounds.

Ethical Dilemma Scenario

  • Narrative:

    • A friend loses a wallet containing $100, and while you find it and could easily keep it without her knowing, you face the moral choice of returning it.

Reactions and Considerations

  • Morality and Objectivity:

    • Moral values present themselves as objective.

    • Objectivism holds that moral facts exist and inform true or false judgments.

    • Questions arise regarding whether moral standards are véritablely objective.

Metaphysical and Knowledge Worries

  • Metaphysical Concerns:

    • Inquiry into the existence of moral properties like rightness or goodness and their subtlety compared to scientific or mathematical properties.

  • Knowledge Issues:

    • Concerns about how we can have genuine moral knowledge if moral facts are peculiar.

Motivational Challenges

  • What Drives Us?:

    • Motivation to act morally may stem from desires or rational thoughts.

    • Critics suggest moral actions are driven by personal desires rather than objective moral truth.

Disagreement Issues

  • Cultural Morality:

    • Diversity in moral codes might suggest the absence of objective moral truths.

    • Peer disagreements further support the notion that objective moral facts may not exist.

Responses to Criticism

  • Alternative Theories:

    • Moral Nihilism: Asserts that there are no moral facts.

    • Cultural Relativism: Claims morality is defined by societal norms and standards.

    • Subjectivism: Proposes that morality depends on individual approval of actions.

Problems with Alternative Theories

  • Implausibility of Nihilism:

    • Moral nihilism conflicts with common moral intuitions (e.g., torturing innocents).

  • Limits of Relativism and Subjectivism:

    • Issues with moral catastrophes and the ability to be wrong in moral situations.

    • Questions about moral progress and contradictions in different viewpoints.

Ideal Observer Theory

  • Modification of Subjectivism:

    • Proposes a standard based on what a fully informed, rational observer would approve.

    • New issues arise regarding the clarity of what such approval entails.

Objectivist Responses to Concerns

  • Impersonal Practical Reasoning:

    • Actions are justified through logical reasoning rather than unusual properties.

    • Acknowledges that moral beliefs may conflict with personal desires but can still motivate.

    • Suggests there is significant agreement in moral beliefs across cultures.

Naturalism vs. Non-Naturalism

  • Definitions:

    • Naturalism equates moral facts with natural properties (e.g., happiness).

    • Non-naturalism regards moral properties as distinct from natural facts.

Moral Nihilism and Error Theory

  • Error Theory:

    1. No moral properties exist.

    2. No moral judgments are correct.

    3. Lack of moral knowledge and valid moral descriptions.

Expressivism

  • Expression Over Truth:

    • Moral judgments express emotions or commands rather than describe states of affairs.

    • Thus, moral statements are classified as neither true nor false.

Challenges for Expressivism

  • Arguments with Moral Content:

    • Addressing the forms of dialogue and moral disagreements that arise.

Overview of Ethical Theories

  • Utilitarianism:

    • J.S. Mill's doctrine that actions are right if they promote happiness, wrong if they generate unhappiness.

    • Right actions maximize utility.

  • Act vs. Rule Utilitarianism:

    • Act Utilitarianism: Considers the rightness of specific actions based on their outcomes.

    • Rule Utilitarianism: Evaluates actions based on conformity to rules that result in the greatest good.

Kantian Deontology

  • Categorical Imperative:

    • Ethical framework asserting duties based on universalizable principles.

    • Formula of Humanity: Treat people as ends, not means.

Virtue Ethics

  • Central Concept: Flourishing as humans through cultivation of virtues (e.g., courage, justice).

  • Components of Virtue:

    1. Epistemic: Understanding moral importance.

    2. Affective: Emotional intelligence and right desires.

    3. Motivational: Acting for the right reasons.

Closing Thoughts

  • Engagement in Metaethics:

    • Reflection on personal resonance with the discussed views and potential responses to their respective challenges.