A simple search of interview techniques yields numerous resources with varying efficacy.
Case Study - Maria's Interviews:
Maria was applying for a high-level public relations role requiring interaction with diverse stakeholders.
Involves policy statements for news media which are critical to the firm's reputation.
The application process included thorough testing, notably two interviews:
Interview 1: Personnel Selection Officer
Interview 2: Clinical Psychologist
The Importance of Interview Appearance
First and last impressions are crucial in interviews (Reece, 2009; Roeckelein, 2002).
Maria prepared by being neat and well-groomed for both interviews.
Structure of the Interviews
Interview with the Personnel Selection Officer
Type: Structured Interview
Uses a printed set of standardized questions.
Example questions:
Outline educational experiences.
Describe work history.
Sample Dialogue:
Officer: "I've read your application form and have gone over your qualifications. Would you now please outline your educational experiences, beginning with high school?"
Maria: "I graduated from high school in June 2001… earned my master’s degree in business administration in 2008."
Final Question: "Why do you believe you are a good candidate for this position?"
Maria felt satisfied with her performance in this structured format.
Interview with the Clinical Psychologist
Type: Unstructured Interview
Conducted without a set list of questions.
Questions flow based on the interviewee's responses.
Sample Dialogue:
Psychologist: "Maria, why don't you tell me a little bit about yourself?"
Maria: "Where do you want me to begin?"
Psychologist: Specific topics based on Maria’s statements (family responsibilities, education).
Differences Between the Two Interviews
Structured vs. Unstructured:
First: Narrow focus on education/work history.
Second: Broader exploration of Maria’s personal insights and feelings.
Directive vs. Nondirective:
First: Personnel officer directed interview flow.
Second: Psychologist allowed Maria to lead response direction.
Types of Interviews:
Employment Interview: Focus on qualifications and job performance.
Diagnostic Interview: Understand emotional functioning rather than qualifications.
Psychological Underpinnings of Interviews
Interviews resemble tests in gathering data about an individual.
Evaluated based on psychometric qualities: reliability and validity.
Classes of Interviews:
Individual vs. Group Interviews.
Structured vs. Unstructured Interviews.
The Reciprocal Nature of Interviewing
Interviews involve mutual interaction; participants influence each other (Breggin, 2002; Elmir et al., 2011).
Transactions in Interviews:
Increased activity levels correspond between interviewer and interviewee (Akehurst & Vrij, 1999).
High activity levels from interrogators lead to increased suspicion of suspects.
Principles of Effective Interviewing
Attitudes that Enhance Interviewing
Good interviewing is characterized by warmth, genuineness, and acceptance (Duan & Kivlighan, 2002).
Perceptions of warmth and understanding positively influence interview quality (Saccuzzo, 1975).
Responses to Avoid
Judgmental statements: Tend to inhibit open discussion.
Probing statements: Perceived as confrontational and may lead to anxiety.
Hostile responses: Can create defensiveness in interviewees.
False reassurance: Dismissive and can inhibit genuine exploration of issues.