An average of 3 or more sound repetitions, prolongations, or blocks per 100 words.
An average of 3 or more stuttering-like disfluencies (i.e., single-syllable-word repetitions, syllable repetitions, sound repetitions, prolongations, or blocks) per 100 words.
Seventy-two percent or more stuttering-like disfluencies per total disfluencies.
Twenty-five percent or more of the total disfluencies are prolongations or blocks.
Instances in which repetitions, prolongations, or blocks occur in adjacent sounds or syllables within a word.
Increases in the rate and irregularity of repetitions.
Signs of excess tension or struggle during moments of disfluency.
Secondary behaviors such as eye blinks, facial tics, or interjections immediately before or during disfluencies.
Feelings of frustration about disfluencies.
Chronic Stuttering
Chronic stuttering – continues from childhood into adolescence/adulthood.
Contributing factors:
Negative feelings and attitudes (self-conscious, out of control).
Avoidance (phonemes, situations).
Difficulties with speech motor control (unusual breathing patterns).
Difficulties with language formulation (phonology/semantics/syntax).
Assessment
Interviews and Case History
Speech Samples
Language Development
Consistency
Adaptation
Feeling and Attitudes
Trial Therapy
Measures
Non-stuttering disfluencies (phrase repetitions, revisions) vs stuttering disfluencies
Frequency of Stuttering
500 Total Words, 76 words were stuttered on. (76/500)∗100=15.2%
Percentage of each disfluency type
76 words were stuttered on, 21 words contained sound prolongations. (21/76)∗100=27.6% prolongations
Treatment - Stuttering Modification
Van Riper, 1973
MIDVAS
Motivation
Identification
Desensitization
Variation
Approximation
Cancellations
Pull-outs
Preparatory Sets
Stabilization
Treatment - Fluency Shaping
Change the way people talk – aim for stutter-free speech
Control rate, onset, transitions, phrasing
Airflow therapy
Gradual Increase in Length and Complexity of Utterances (GILCU)
Aim to integrate Stuttering Modification and Fluency Shaping
Stuttering Modification Versus Fluency Shaping
Stuttering Modification
Client is taught to stutter less and more easily.
Speech is more natural.
Considerable focus on attitudes and negative reactions to speaking situations.
Fluency Shaping
Client is taught to have stutter-free speech.
Loss of speech naturalness.
Little to no attention given to attitudes, negative reactions, and so on.